Evaluation of Subgrade Strength and Pavement Designs for Reliability
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 4
Abstract
Reliability is an important factor in flexible pavement design to consider the variability associated with the design inputs. In this study, subgrade strength variability and flexible pavement designs are evaluated for reliability. Six existing pavement section’s design data are studied using probabilistic, AASHTO, and mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG). Parameters such as mean, maximum likelihood, median, coefficient of variation, and density distribution function of subgrade strength ( value) are determined. Design outputs are compared in terms of reliability and thickness using these design procedures. It is shown that the AASHTO provides higher reliability values compared to the probabilistic procedure. All the existing pavements fail in the MEPDG distress reliability such as rutting and top-down cracking reliabilities. Currently, New Mexico Department of Transportation uses a single design value to deal with variability associated with subgrade strength in flexible pavement design. It is shown in this study that single design value for a roadway section does not yield an effective design regarding target reliability, while the subsectioning procedure based on coefficient of variance of value is a better way to deal with the subgrade variability. An assessment of minimum value for making the decision of subexcavation is also presented. It is shown that increasing the minimum value for subexcavation is not always the proper solution to meet design reliability; rather it yields an inefficient design for requiring higher frequencies of subexcavation. Finally, the reliability of the flexible pavement design is evaluated by varying hot mix asphalt properties. Alternative designs are recommended for the existing pavement thicknesses by modifying material and subgrade properties to mitigate different distresses.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project is funded by New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT). The writers thank the project panel members, especially Bob Meyers, Material Bureau Chief, for being the sponsor of this project, and Jeffery S. Mann, Head of the Pavement Design Section, for being the advocate of this project. The writers highly appreciate panem members’ assistance in data gathering and suggestions during quarterly meetings thought the duration of this project.
References
AASHTO. (1972). AASHTO interim guide for design of pavement structures, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (1993). AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Abaza, K. A. (2002). “Optimum flexible pavement life-cycle analysis model.” J. Transp. Eng., 128(6), 542–549.
Alsherri, A., and George, K. P. (1988). “Reliable model for pavement performance.” J. Transp. Eng., 114(3), 294–306.
Attoh-Okine, O. N., and Roddis, W. M. K. (1994). “Pavement thickness variability and its effect on determination of moduli and remaining life.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1447, 39–45.
Bahia, H. (2006). “Modified asphalt binder for paving application.” Asphalt mix design and construction-past, present and future, ASCE, Reston, Va., 84–154.
Bandra, N., and Rowe, G. M. (2003). “Design subgrade resilient modulus for Florida subgrade soils, resilient modulus testing for pavement components.” ASTM STP 1437, G. N. Durham, W. A. Marr, and W. L. De Groff, eds., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa., 85–96.
Bartlett and West Engineers. (2004). “Pavement design for Kasold Drive: Clinton Parkway to 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas.” Final Report, Project No. 14251.001, Bartlett and West Engineers, Lawrence, Kan.
British Columbia Ministry of Transportation (BCMOT). (2007). Construction and rehabilitation cost guide, BCMOT, Canada.
Chua, K. H., Der Kiureghian, A., and Monismith, C. L. (1992). “Stochastic model for pavement design.” J. Transp. Eng., 118(6), 769–786.
Darter, M., Khazanovich, L., Yu, T., and Mallela, J. (2005). “Reliability analysis of cracking and fault prediction in the new mechanistic-empirical design procedure.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1936, 150–160.
Deshpande, V. P., Damnjanovic, I., and Gardoni, P. (2008). “Modeling the effects of rehabilitation actions on the reliability of flexible pavements.” Proc., Transportation Research Record 87th Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
George, K. P., and Uddin, W. (2000). “Subgrade characterization for highway pavement design.” Rep. No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-00-131, Research Div., Mississippi Dept. of Transportation, Jackson, Miss.
Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Khogali, W. E. I., and Mohamed, E. H. H. (2004). “Novel approach for characterization of unbound materials.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1874, 38–46.
MEPDG Documentation. (2007). “Mechanistic empirical pavement design guide, version 1.0.” Transportation Research Board, ⟨http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/mepdg/home.htm⟩ (July 2008).
NCHRP 1–37A. (2004). “Mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” Subgrade/foundation design inputs. Part-2 design inputs, Chapter 1, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2.1.1–2.1.35.
New Mexico Department of Transportation. (2004). New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) standard specifications for highway and bridge construction, section 200–600, New Mexico DOT, Santa Fe, N.M., 91–205.
New Mexico Department of Transportation. (2006). “Estimated resistivity value by AASHTO soils classification.” NMDOT estimated “ -value” method, New Mexico DOT, Sante Fe, N.M.
New Mexico Department of Transportation. (2008). Pavement design manual, Engineering Support Div., Pavement Design Bureau, New Mexico DOT, Santa Fe, N.M.
Ping, W. V., and Yang, Z. (2006). “Measuring resilient modulus of subgrade materials for design of pavement structures.” Geotechnical special publication no. 154: Pavement mechanics and performance, ASCE, Reston, Va., 89–194.
Rajbongshi, P., and Das, A. (2008). “Optimal asphalt pavement design considering cost and reliability.” J. Transp. Eng., 134(6), 255–261.
Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., Lee, D. Y., and Kennedy, T. W. (1996). “Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design, and Construction.” National Asphalt Pavement Assoc. Education Foundation, Lanham, Md.
Sanchez-Silva, M., Arroyo, O., Junca, M., Caro, S., and Caicedo, B. (2005). “Reliability based design optimization of asphalt pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng., 6(4), 281–294.
Tarefder, R. A., Saha, N., Hall, J. W., and Ng, P. T. T. (2008). “Evaluating weak subgrade for pavement design and performance prediction: A case study of US 550.” Journal of GeoEngineering, 3(1), 13–24.
Theyse, H. L., Hoover, T. P., Harvey, J. T., Monismith, C. L., and Coetzee, N. F. (2006). “A mechanistic-empirical subgrade design model based on heavy vehicle simulator test results.” Geotechnical special publication no. 154, ASCE, Reston, Va., 195–202.
Zhang, Z., and Damnjanovic, I. (2006). “Applying method of moments to model reliability of pavement infrastructure.” J. Transp. Eng., 132(5), 416–424.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136 • Issue 4 • April 2010
Pages: 379 - 391
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 26, 2009
Accepted: Sep 14, 2009
Published online: Mar 15, 2010
Published in print: Apr 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.