TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 1, 2009

Including Minor Modes of Transport in a Tour-Based Mode Choice Model with Household Interactions

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 12

Abstract

Mode choice models used for travel demand forecasting generally include “major” transportation modes of driving, ridesharing, walking, and riding public transit. In the Toronto Area, these make up 96% of all trips. This paper describes the challenge of realistically modeling “minor” modes, while maintaining behavioral realism in the rest of the model. This is critical to public policy since increasing the mode share of bicycling, commuter rail, and school bus has the potential to reduce emissions, save on expensive auto infrastructure, encourage healthier lifestyles, reduce congestion, and support liveable communities. The tour-based model presented in this paper simulates household interactions as part of the mode choice process. Model parameters are estimated using a choice-based sample of tours in the Toronto Area and a genetic algorithm. The model shows very good results for commuter rail and school bus modes, but limited success for the drive access subway, taxi, and bicycle modes. Representation of niche markets through restricted choice sets allows for a parsimonious utility function that includes level of service, land-use, activity, and socioeconomic variables.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The funding for this project came, in part, from Transport Canada and a variety of other sponsors involved in a Transportation Planning and Modal Integration project. We also acknowledge the earlier work of Jesse Coleman who provided insights into the markets for minor modes.

References

Algers, S., Daly, A. J., and Widlert, S. (1997). “Modeling travel behaviour to support policy making in Stockholm.” Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change, P. Stopher and M. Lee-Gosselin, eds., Pergamon, Oxford.
Aultman-Hall, L. M. (1996). “Commuter bicycle route choice: Analysis of major determinants and safety implications.” Ph.D. thesis, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ont.
Axhausen, K. W., and Smith, R. L. (1986). “Bicyclist link evaluation: a stated-preference approach.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1085, 7–15.
Beser, M., and Algers, S. (2002). “SAMPERS—The new Swedish national travel demand forecasting tool.” National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, L. Lundqvist and L. -G. Mattsson, eds., Springer, Stockholm.
Bhat, C., and Sardesai, R. (2006). “The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 40(9), 709–730.
Bhat, C. R. (1995). “A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 29(6), 471–483.
Bhat, C. R. (1998a). “Accommodating flexible substitution patterns in multi-dimensional choice modeling: Formulation and application to travel mode and departure time choice.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 32(7), 455–466.
Bhat, C. R. (1998b). “Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 32(7), 495–507.
Boile, M. P., Spasovic, L. N., and Bladikas, A. K. (1995). “Modeling intermodal auto-rail commuter networks.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1516, 38–47.
Bradley, M., Outwater, M. L., Jonnalagadda, N., and Ruiter, E. R. (2001). “Estimation of activity-based microsimulation model for San Francisco.” CD Proc., 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, NRC, Washington, D.C.
Coleman, J. (2002). “An improved mode choice model for the Greater Toronto Area travel demand modeling system.” Working paper, Joint Program in Transportation, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
Data Management Group. (1997). TTS Version 3: Data Guide, Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Davidson, W., et al. (2007). “Synthesis of first practices and operational research approaches in activity-based travel demand modeling.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 41(5), 464–488.
Ewing, R., Schroeer, W., and Greene, W. (2004). “School location and student travel: Analysis of factors affecting mode choice.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1895, 55–63.
Hess, D. B. (2001). “The effects of free parking on commuter mode choice: Evidence from travel diary data.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1753, 35–42.
Hunt, J. D., and Abraham, J. (2007). “Influences on bicycle use.” Transportation, 34, 453–470.
Hunt, J. D., McMillan, J., and Stefan, K. (2007). “Estimation of a weekend choice model for Calgary.” Proc., 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB (CD-ROM), NRC, Washington, D.C.
Jonnalagadda, N., Freedman, J. W., Davidson, A., and Hunt, J. D. (2001). “Development of microsimulation activity-based model for San Francisco: Destination and mode choice models.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1777, 25–35.
Koppelman, F. S., and Wen, C. -H. (1997). “The paired combinatorial logit model: Properties, estimation and application.” Proc., 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, NRC, Washington, D.C.
Manski, C. F., and Lerman, S. R. (1977). “The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples.” Econometrica, 45(8), 1977–1988.
Miller, E. J. (2001a). The Greater Toronto Area travel demand modeling system, version 2.0: Vol. 1. Model overview, Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Miller, E. J. (2001b). The Greater Toronto Area travel demand modeling system, version 2.0: Vol. III. User’s manual, Joint Program in Transportation, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
Miller, E. J., Roorda, M. J., and Carrasco, J. A. (2005). “A tour-based model of travel mode choice.” Transportation, 32(4), 399–422.
Ortúzar, J. de D., and Willumsen, L. (2001). Modeling transport, Wiley, Chichester, N.Y.
Replogle, M. (1995). Integrating pedestrian and bicycle factors into regional transportation planning models—Summary of the state of the art and suggested steps forward, Environmental Defence Fund, Washington, D.C.
Roorda, M. J., Carrasco, J. A., and Miller, E. J. (2009). “An integrated model of vehicle transactions, activity scheduling and mode choice.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 43(2), 217–229.
Roorda, M. J., Miller, E. J., and Kruchten, N. (2006). “Incorporating within-household interactions into a mode choice model using a genetic algorithm for parameter estimation.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1985, 171–179.
Vovsha, P. (1997). “The cross-nested logit model: Application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv Metropolitan Area.” Proc., 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, NRC, Washington, D.C.
Vovsha, P., and Petersen, E. (2005). “Escorting children to school: Statistical analysis and applied modeling approach.” CD Proc., 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, NRC, Washington, D.C.
Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., and Donnelly, R. (2002). “Microsimulation in travel demand modeling: Lessons learned from the New York best practice model.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1805, 68–77.
Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., and Donnelly, R. (2003). “Explicit modeling of joint travel by household members: Statistical evidence and applied approach.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1831, 1–10.
Vovsha, P., Petersen, E., and Donnelly, R. (2004). “Impact of intra-household interactions on individual daily activity travel patterns.” CD Proc., 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, NRC, Washington, D.C.
Walker, J., and Ben-Akiva, M. (2001). “Extensions of the random utility model.” Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Wen, C. -H., and Koppelman, F. S. (1999). “An integrated model system of stop generation and tour formation for the analysis of activity and travel patterns.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1676, 136–144.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135Issue 12December 2009
Pages: 935 - 945

History

Received: Jun 10, 2008
Accepted: May 21, 2009
Published online: Jun 1, 2009
Published in print: Dec 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew J. Roorda [email protected]
P.Eng.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, Canada M5S 1A4 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Dylan Passmore [email protected]
Research Assistant, Univ. of Toronto, 100 St. George St., Toronto, Canada M5S 3G3. E-mail: [email protected]
Eric J. Miller [email protected]
Bahen Tanenbaum Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, Canada M5S 1A4. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share