TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 9, 2009

Multiobjective Approach to Long-Term Interurban Multilevel Road Network Planning

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 9

Abstract

This article presents a multiobjective approach to long-term interurban multilevel road network planning. In addition to the efficiency objectives dealt with in most of the literature where the subject is addressed, the approach takes into account robustness and equity objectives. For achieving the objectives, two types of action can be performed: the construction of a new road of a given level; and the upgrading of an existing road to a higher level. The approach is consistent with the planning framework of the highway capacity manual, using the concept of level of service to assess traffic flow conditions. The application of the approach is illustrated for a case study involving the main road network of Poland.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The participation of the first writer in the study reported in this article has been supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia through Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDSFRH/BD/16407/2004.

References

Abdulaal, M., and Leblanc, L. J. (1979). “Continuous equilibrium network design models.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 13(1), 19–32.
Antunes, A., Seco, A., and Pinto, N. (2003). “An accessibility-maximization approach to road network planning.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 18(3), 224–240.
Bana e Costa, C. A., and Vansnick, J. C. (1997). “Applications of the Macbeth approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model.” J. Multi-Criter. Decis. Anal., 6(2), 107–114.
Batty, M., and Torrens, P. M. (2005). “Modelling and prediction in a complex world.” Futures, 37(7), 745–766.
Ben-Ayed, O., Blair, C. E., Boyce, D. E., and LeBlanc, L. J. (1992). “Construction of a real-world bilevel linear programming model of the highway network design problem.” Ann. Operat. Res., 34, 219–254.
Boyce, D. E., and Janson, B. N. (1980). “A discrete transportation network design problem with combined trip distribution and assignment.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 14(1–2), 147–154.
Cantarella, G. E., and Vitetta, A. (2006). “The multi-criteria road network design problem in an urban area.” Transportation, 33(6), 567–588.
Chen, A., Yang, H., Lo, H. K., and Tang, W. H. (1999). “A capacity related reliability for transportation networks.” J. Adv. Transp., 33(2), 183–200.
Cohon, J. L., and Rothley, K. (1997). “Multiobjective methods.” Design and operation of civil and environment engineering systems, C. S. Revelle and A. E. McGarity, eds., Wiley, New York.
D'Este, G. M., and Taylor, M. A. P. (2003). “Network vulnerability: An approach to reliability analysis at the level of national strategic transport networks.” The network reliability of transport, M. G. H. Bell and Y. Iida, eds. Elsevier, Oxford, U.K., 23–44.
Daly, A. (2000). “National models.” Handbook of transport modelling, D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button, eds., Elsevier Science, Oxford, U.K.
Feng, C. M., and Wu, J. Y. J. (2003). “Highway investment planning model for equity issues.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 129(3), 161–176.
Friesz, T. L., Anandalingam, G., Mehta, N. J., Nam, K., Shah, S. J., and Tobin, R. L. (1993). “The multiobjective equilibrium network design problem revisited—A simulated annealing approach.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 65(1), 44–57.
Friesz, T. L., and Harker, P. T. (1983). “Multi-objective design of transportation networks—The case of spatial price equilibrium.” Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, P. Hansen, ed., Springer, Berlin, 86–93.
Friesz, T. L., Hsun-jung, C., Mehta, N. J., Tobin, R. L., and Anandalingam, G. (1992). “A simulated annealing approach to the network design problem with variational inequality constraints.” Transp. Sci., 26(1), 18–26.
Gendreau, M., and Potvin, J. Y. (2005). “Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization.” Ann. Operat. Res., 140(1), 189–213.
Guhathakurta, S. (2002). “Urban modeling as storytelling: Using simulation models as a narrative.” Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des., 29(6), 895–911.
Janson, B. N., Buckels, L. S., and Peterson, B. E. (1991). “Network design programming of united-states highway improvements.” J. Transp. Eng., 117(4), 457–478.
Jara-Diaz, S., and Friesz, T. L. (1982). “Measuring the benefits derived from a transportation investment.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 16(1), 57–77.
Keeble, D., Owens, P. L., and Thompson, C. (1982). “Regional accessibility and economic-potential in the European-community.” Reg. Stud., 16(6), 419–431.
Kokko, H., Mackenzie, A., Reynolds, J. D., Lindström, J., and Sutherland, W. J. (1999). “Measures of inequality are not equal.” Am. Nat., 154(3), 358–382.
Leblanc, L. J. (1975). “An algorithm for the discrete network design problem.” Transp. Sci., 9(3), 183–199.
Lo, H. K., and Tung, Y. K. (2003). “Network with degradable links: Capacity analysis and design.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 37(4), 345–363.
Meng, Q., and Yang, H. (2002). “Benefit distribution and equity in road network design.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 36(1), 19–35.
Michalewicz, Z., and Fogel, D. B. (2004). How to solve it: Modern heuristics, Springer, Berlin.
Ortúzar, J. D., and Willumsen, L. G. (2001). Modelling transport, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). “How to make a decision—The analytic hierarchy process.” Interfaces, 24(6), 19–43.
Santos, B., Antunes, A., and Miller, E. J. (2005). “Solving an accessibility-maximization road network design model: A comparison of heuristics.” Advanced OR and AI methods in transportation, A. Jaszkiewicz, M. Kaczmarek, J. Zak, and M. Kubiak, eds., Poznan, Poland, 692–697.
Santos, B., Antunes, A., and Miller, E. J. (2006) “Optroad: A computer program for interurban road network planning.” Proc., Joint Int. Conf. on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, H. Rivard, H. Melhem, and E. Miresco, eds., Montreal, 996–1005.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000). Highway capacity manual, Washington, D.C.
Tzeng, G. H., and Tsaur, S. H. (1997). “Application of multiple criteria decision making for network improvement.” J. Adv. Transp., 31(1), 49–74.
Ukkusuri, S. V., Mathew, T. V., and Waller, S. T. (2007). “Robust transportation network design under demand uncertainty.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 22(1), 6–18.
Vickerman, R., Spiekermann, K., and Wegener, M. (1999). “Accessibility and economic development in Europe.” Reg. Stud., 33(1), 1–15.
Wardrop, J. G. (1952). “Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research.” Proc.-Inst. Civ. Eng., 1(36), 325–378.
Yang, H., and Bell, M. G. H. (1998). “Models and algorithms for road network design: A review and some new developments.” Transport Rev., 18(3), 257–278.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135Issue 9September 2009
Pages: 640 - 649

History

Received: Oct 31, 2008
Accepted: Feb 24, 2009
Published online: Mar 9, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bruno Santos [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Coimbra, Polo II, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
António Antunes
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Coimbra, Polo II, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal.
Eric Miller
Bahen-Tanenbaum Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, Canada ON M5S 1A4.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share