Abstract
Professional engineering and surveying registration boards are being challenged to balance the need to protect life, safety, and welfare against the work that has traditionally been conducted by licensed professionals. Unmanned aerial systems (UASs) capabilities have increased dramatically and have disrupted the surveying sector. These systems provide high-resolution images and enable the collection of accurate data. Today, many aerial photography firms utilize UASs to conduct flyovers, capturing images that can be further processed to produce a desired output for their customer. The scope of services varies depending on the customer, who at times requests the identification of their own parcels with metadata, including coordinates derived using Global Navigation Satellite Systems. In addition, by processing the data with appropriate software one can approximate the volume of materials on site, approximate parcel boundaries, and related information such as utilities. The challenge for registration boards is to determine if these tasks, as well as others, are required to be performed by licensed personnel. Over the past several years boards have been challenged in interpreting the tasks requiring licensure. The intent of this article is to present a review of relatively recent cases that have caused consternation among the surveying community. The question to answer is whether professional registration boards can require licensing to perform these and other similar tasks and, at the same time, prevent a company from disseminating its work. One case relies on statutory interpretation whereas the two other cases rely on the right to free speech protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the Author upon reasonable request.
References
Bartsch, R., J. Coyne, and K. Gray. 2016. Drones in Society: Exploring the strange new world of unmanned aircraft. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
Cutler, S., and L. Lipps. 2000. “Expressive conduct.” Georgetown J. Gender Law 285.
DOT/FHA (Federal Highway Administration). 2019. Use of small unmanned aerial systems for land surveying. Washington, DC: DOT/FHA. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/uas/resources/hif20034.pdf.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). 2021. Drones by the numbers. Washington, DC: FAA.
Madison County, Mississippi. 2020. Before the Chancery Court of Madison County, Mississippi 45 CH 1:17-cv-00902: Chancery Court December 11, 2020.
Merkert, R. B., and J. Bushell. 2020. “Managing the drone revolution: A systematic literature review into the current use of airborne drones and future strategic directions for their effective control.” J. Air Transp. Manage. 89 (Oct): 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101929.
Richards, D. L. 2015. “Open source UAV platform development for aerial photography.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Geography, California State Univ.
Shatz, B. G. 2008. Gimme 5: What every lawyer should know about stare decisis. Los Angeles: LA County Bar Update.
Surveyors, M. B. 2019. “Declaratory opinion: The practice of surveying.” Accessed February 6, 2019. https://www.pepls.ms.gov/sites/pepls/files/PEPLS%202020/Board%20Opinions%2C%20communications%20etc/Opinion%20-%20Surveying%20-%20pg%201-3%20v2%20(6).pdf.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 24, 2021
Accepted: Aug 19, 2022
Published online: Mar 10, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 10, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.