Technical Papers
Oct 26, 2022

An Improved Bayesian von Karman Regularization Method for the Joint Inversion of GNSS and InSAR Data

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 1

Abstract

Given the problem that the relative weights of multitype data sets are not considered in the current studies of Bayesian von Karman regularized slip distribution inversion, we propose to add hyperparameters that control the variance-covariance information of different data sets within the Bayesian framework, present a detailed and complete theoretical method, and successfully apply it to the earthquake that occurred in Norcia, Italy, in 2016. Synthetic tests show that compared with the Bayesian von Karman regularization method with equal weights for different data, the improved Bayesian von Karman regularization method can more effectively invert the real slip distribution of this dip-slip earthquake, its inversion results are more stable, and the data fitting accuracy is higher, thus verifying the advantages of the improved method. In the slip inversion of the Norcia earthquake, the hyperparameters of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data sets converged to different values, which shows it is indeed necessary to determine different relative weights of different data sets. Moreover, the inversion results show that this earthquake ruptured to the surface, the fault slip region was mainly concentrated in a depth range of 0–6 km, the maximum slip was 3.87 m, and the released coseismic seismic moment was 8.95×1018  Nm, corresponding to a moment magnitude of MW=6.60. These results are consistent with the existing research, thus verifying the practicability of the improved method.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by reasonable request. The GNSS data of the Norcia earthquake were obtained from the Italian Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology. The SAR data of Sentinel-1 were obtained from the scientific data center of ESA. The terrain in some maps used SRTM data from Tozer (2019).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all of the anonymous reviewers and editor Professor Marwa Fayed for their careful review and valuable suggestions, which improved the quality of this paper. The authors thank Dr. Hua Gao for providing the InSAR data of the Norcia earthquake. Thanks to Dr. Wanpeng Feng for providing the MPSO code. Thanks to Dr. Amey for his help in this paper. The code for this paper refers to the slipBERI package, and the authors hereby express their gratitude. Some of the figures in this study were drawn using Generic Mapping Tools (GMT), which is an open source software. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41874001, 42174011, and 42104008) and the Innovation Fund Designated for Graduate Students of Jiangxi Province (No. YC2020-S500).

References

Amey, R. M. J., A. Hooper, and Y. Moshishita. 2019. “Going to any lengths: Solving for fault size and fractal slip for the 2016, Mw 6.2 Central Tottori earthquake, Japan, using a transdimensional inversion scheme.” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124 (4): 4001–4016. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016434.
Amey, R. M. J., A. Hooper, and R. J. Walters. 2018. “A Bayesian method for incorporating self-similarity into earthquake slip inversions.” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123 (7): 6052–6071. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015316.
Amiri-Simkooei, A. R. 2016. “Non-negative least-squares variance component estimation with application to GNSS time series.” J. Geod. 90 (5): 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0886-9.
Bagnardi, M., and A. Hooper. 2018. “Inversion of surface deformation data for rapid estimates of source parameters and uncertainties: A Bayesian approach.” Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19 (7): 2194–2211. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007585.
Bock, Y., and D. Melgar. 2016. “Physical applications of GNSS geodesy: A review.” Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 (10): 106801. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/10/106801.
Cheloni, D., V. De Novellis, and M. Albano. 2017. “Geodetic model of the 2016 central Italy earthquake sequence Inferred from InSAR and GNSS data.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 44 (13): 6778–6787. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073580.
Chiaraluce, L., R. Di Stefano, and E. Tinti. 2017. “The 2016 central Italy seismic sequence: A first look at the mainshocks, aftershocks, and source models.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 88 (3): 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160221.
Doglioni, C., F. Mongelli, and P. Pieri. 1994. “The Puglia uplift (SE Italy): An anomaly in the foreland of the Apenninic subduction due to buckling of a thick continental lithosphere.” Tectonics 13 (5): 1309–1321. https://doi.org/10.1029/94TC01501.
Elliott, J. R., A. J. Elliott, and A. Hooper. 2015. “Earthquake monitoring gets boost from a new satellite.” Eos 96 (3): 15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2015EO023967.
Feng, W. P., et al. 2017. “A slip gap of the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji, Xinjiang, China, earthquake inferred from Sentinel-1 TOPS interferometry.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 88 (4): 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170019.
Feng, W. P., and Z. H. Li. 2010. “A novel hybrid PSO/simplex algorithm for determining earthquake source parameter using InSAR data.” [In Chinese.] Progress Geophys. 25 (4): 1189–1196.
Fukuda, J., and K. M. Johnson. 2008. “A fully Bayesian inversion for spatial distribution of fault slip with objective smoothing.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98 (3): 1128–1146. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070194.
Fukuda, J., and K. M. Johnson. 2010. “Mixed linear–non-linear inversion of crustal deformation data: Bayesian inference of model, weighting and regularization parameters.” Geophys. J. Int. 181 (3): 1441–1458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04564.x.
Funning, G. J., R. M. Barke, and S. H. Lamb. 2005. “The 1998 Aiquile, Bolivia earthquake: A seismically active fault revealed with InSAR.” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 232 (1–2): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.01.013.
GCMT (Global Centroid Moment Tensor). 2021. “The Global Centroid Moment Tensor (GCMT) project.” Accessed June 1, 2021. http://www.globalcmt.org.
Hang, Y., S. Barbot, and J. Dauwels. 2020. “Outlier-insensitive Bayesian inference for linear inverse problems (OutIBI) with applications to space geodetic data.” Geophys. J. Int. 221 (1): 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz559.
Hansen, P. C. 1998. “Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems: Numerical aspects of linear inversion.” In Society for industrial and applied mathematics. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Hastings, W. K. 1970. “Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.” Biometrika 57 (1): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.1.97.
Helmert, F. R. 1907. Die Ausgleichungsrechnung nach der Methode der kleinsten Quadrate: mit Anwendungen auf die Geod&adotsie. die Physik und die Theorie der Messinstrumente. Germany: B.G. Teubner.
Huang, M. H., D. Dreger, and R. Bürgmann. 2013. “Joint inversion of seismic and geodetic data for the source of the 2010 March 4, Mw6.3 Jia-Shian, SW Taiwan, earthquake.” Geophys. J. Int. 193 (58): 1608–1626. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt058.
INGV (Italian Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology). 2018. “Rete integrate nazionale GNSS.” Accessed March 1, 2018. http://ring.gm.ingv.it/.
INGV (Italian Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology). 2021. “The Italian Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology.” Accessed June 1, 2021. https://www.ingv.it/.
Jónsson, S., H. Zebker, and P. Segall. 2002. “Fault slip distribution of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, estimated from satellite radar and GNSS measurements.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 (4): 1377–1389.
Kaverina, A., D. Dreger, and E. Price. 2002. “The combined inversion of seismic and geodetic data for the source process of the 16 October 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 (4): 1266–1280. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000907.
Li, Z. H., J. R. Elliott, and W. P. Feng. 2011. “The 2010 Mw 6.8 Yushu (Qinghai, China) earthquake: Constraints provided by InSAR and body wave seismology.” J. Geophys. Res. 116 (10): 358. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008358.
Liu, C. L., Y. Zheng, and Z. J. Xie. 2017. “Rupture features of the 2016 Mw 6.2 Norcia earthquake and its possible relationship with strong seismic hazards.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 44 (3): 1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071958.
Mai, P. M., and G. C. Beroza. 2002. “A spatial random field model to characterize complexity in earthquake slip.” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 107 (11): 2308. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000588.
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
Mildon, Z. K., G. P. Roberts, and W. J. P. Faure. 2017. “Coulomb stress transfer and fault interaction over millennia on non-planar active normal faults: The Mw 6.5–5.0 seismic sequence of 2016–2017, central Italy.” Geophys. J. Int. 210 (2): 1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx213.
Milliner, C., C. Sammis, and A. Allam. 2016. “Resolving fine-scale heterogeneity of co-seismic slip and the relation to fault structure.” Sci. Rep. 6 (21): 27201. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27201.
Mosegaard, K., and A. Tarantola. 1995. “Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems.” J. Geophys. Res. 100 (7): 12431–12447. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB03097.
Okada, Y. 1985. “Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 75 (4): 1135–1154. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0750041135.
Parsons, T., R. S. Yeats, and Y. Yagi. 2006. “Static stress change from the 8 October, 2005 M = 7.6 Kashmir earthquake.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 (3): 6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025429.
Scognamiglio, L., E. Tinti, and E. Casarotti. 2018. “Complex fault geometry and rupture dynamics of the Mw 6.5, 30 October 2016, central Italy earthquake.” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123 (4): 2943–2964. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018JB015603.
Sun, J. B., Z. K. Shen, and R. Bürgmann. 2013. “A three-step maximum a posteriori probability method for InSAR data inversion of coseismic rupture with application to the 14 April 2010 Mw 6.9 Yushu, China, earthquake.” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 118 (8): 4599–4627. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50244.
Teunissen, P. J. G., and A. R. Amiri-Simkooei. 2008. “Least-squares variance component estimation.” J. Geod. 82 (2): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0157-x.
Tozer, B. 2019. “SRTM15+V2.0.” Accessed July 26, 2022. https://figshare.com/projects/SRTM15_V2_0/62045.
Tozer, B., D. T. Sandwell, and W. H. Smith. 2019. “Global bathymetry and topography at 15 arc sec: SRTM15+.” Earth Space Sci. 6 (10): 1847–1864. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000658.
Villani, F., R. Civico, and S. Pucci. 2018. “A database of the coseismic effects following the 30 October 2016 Norcia earthquake in central Italy.” Sci. Data 5 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.49.
Wang, K., D. S. Dreger, and E. Tinti. 2020. “Rupture process of the 2019 Ridgecrest, California Mw 6.4 foreshock and Mw 7.1 earthquake constrained by seismic and geodetic data.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 110 (4): 1603–1626. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200108.
Wang, L. Y., H. Gao, and G. C. Feng. 2018a. “Source parameters and triggering links of the earthquake sequence in central Italy from 2009 to 2016 analyzed with GNSS and InSAR data.” Tectonophysics 744 (Jun): 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.07.013.
Wang, L. Y., and W. W. Gu. 2020. “A-optimal design method to determine the regularization parameter of coseismic slip distribution inversion.” Geophys. J. Int. 221 (1): 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa030.
Wang, L. Y., C. J. Xu, and C. Y. Zhang. 2012. “A two-step method to determine relative weight ratio factors in joint inversion.” [In Chinese.] Acta Geod. Cartographica Sin. 41 (1): 19–24.
Wang, L. Y., X. Zhao, and H. Gao. 2018b. “A method for determining the regularization parameter and the relative weight ratio of the seismic slip distribution with multi-source data.” J. Geodyn. 118 (Apr): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2018.04.005.
Wang, Q., X. J. Qiao, and Q. G. Lan. 2011. “Rupture of deep faults in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and uplift of the Longmen Shan.” Nat. Geosci. 4 (9): 634–640. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1210.
Wessel, P., W. H. F. Smith, and R. Scharroo. 2013. “Generic mapping tools: Improved version released.” EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 94 (45): 409–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO450001.
Wright, T. J., Z. Lu, and C. Wicks. 2003. “Source model for the Mw 6.7, 23 October 2002, Nenana mountain earthquake (Alaska) from InSAR.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 (18): 1974. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018014.
Xu, C. J., K. H. Ding, and J. Q. Cai. 2009. “Methods of determining weight scaling factors for geodetic-geophysical joint inversion.” J. Geodyn. 47 (1): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2008.06.005.
Xu, G. Y., C. J. Xu, and Y. M. Wen. 2017. “Source parameters of the 2016–2017 central Italy earthquake sequence from the Sentinel-1, ALOS-2 and GNSS data.” Remote Sensing 9 (11): 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111182.
Xu, G. Y., C. J. Xu, and Y. M. Wen. 2018. “Sentinel-1 observation of the 2017 Sangsefid earthquake, northeastern Iran: Rupture of a blind reserve-slip fault near the Eastern Kopeh Dagh.” Tectonophysics 731 (Mar): 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.03.009.
Xu, Q., Q. Chen, and J. J. Zhao. 2020. “Sequential modeling of the 2016 central Italy earthquake cluster using multi-source satellite observations and quantitative assessment of Coulomb stress change.” Geophys. J. Int. 221 (1): 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa036.
Xu, X. H., X. P. Tong, and D. T. Sandwell. 2016. “Refining the shallow slip deficit.” Geophys. J. Int. 204 (3): 1843–1862. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv563.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 149Issue 1February 2023

History

Received: Jul 19, 2021
Accepted: Jun 15, 2022
Published online: Oct 26, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 26, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Faculty of Geomatics, East China Univ. of Technology, Nanchang 330013, PR China; Professor, Key Laboratory of Mine Environmental Monitoring and Improving around Poyang Lake, Ministry of Natural Resources, Nanchang 330013, PR China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-2030. Email: [email protected]
Longxiang Sun [email protected]
Master’s Candidate, Faculty of Geomatics, East China Univ. of Technology, Nanchang 330013, PR China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Lecturer, Faculty of Geomatics, East China Univ. of Technology, Nanchang 330013, PR China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share