Technical Papers
Jun 10, 2021

Multistart Nelder–Mead Neural Network Algorithm for Earthquake Source Parameter Inversion of 2017 Bodrum–Kos Earthquake

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 3

Abstract

A multistart Nelder–Mead neural network algorithm (multi NM-NNA) is presented, the purpose of which is to solve the problem that the existing nonlinear search algorithms are unstable when inversing earthquake source parameters with GPS data. Multi NM-NNA uses the nonuniform sampling strategy to generate the initial starting points to reduce manual intervention, and the Nelder–Mead simplex algorithm is used to optimize the local optimization capability of the NNA. Different GPS stations and fault types are simulated, and the NNA, hybrid particle swarm optimization (PSO)/simplex algorithm [multipeaks particle swarm optimization (MPSO)], and NM-NNA are used to perform earthquake source parameter inversion, respectively. The simulation experiment results show that the calculation precision of the NM-NNA is not affected by the number of stations, and it has better stability in the inversion of different fault types. Compared with the NNA and MPSO, the NM-NNA is more suitable for earthquake source parameter inversion, and the computational efficiency is higher than the NNA. The NNA, MPSO, NM-NNA, and multi NM-NNA are used to invert the earthquake source parameters of the Bodrum–Kos earthquake and carry out the precision estimation of the parameters. Experimental results show that the parameter estimates inverted by the multi NM-NNA are closer to the existing research results and have smaller standard deviation. It is shown that inversion uncertainty of the multi NM-NNA is lower, the calculation results are more stable, and the computational efficiency of the multi NM-NNA is higher than NNA. In the complex and changeable earthquake environment, the multi NM-NNA has greater application potential.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The types of raw data include the left lateral slip fault monitored by different GPS stations and different slip fault models, and can be provided as a MAT file.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all of the anonymous reviewers and editors for their careful review and valuable suggestions, which improved the quality of this paper. The authors thank Yingwen Zhao for his patient help. Part of the code used in this article comes from the MathWorks website, and some images were drawn using the open source software GMT. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41874001 and 41664001), National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFB0501405), and Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20202BABL212015 and 20202BABL204070).

References

Árnadóttir, T., and P. Segall. 1994. “The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake imaged from inversion of geodetic data.” J. Geophys. Res. 99 (B11): 21835–21855. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB01256.
Beatriz, A. G., and R. A. Vázquez. 2015. “Designing artificial neural networks using particle swarm optimization algorithms.” Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2015: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/369298.
Beaty, K. S., D. R. Schmitt, and M. Sacchi. 2002. “Simulated annealing inversion of multimode Rayleigh wave dispersion curves for geological structure.” Geophys. J. Int. 151 (2): 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01809.x.
Bürgmann, R., M. E. Ayhan, E. J. Fielding, T. J. Wright, S. McClusky, B. Aktug, C. Demir, O. Lenk, and A. Türkezer. 2002. “Deformation during the 12 November 1999 Düzce, Turkey, earthquake, from GPS and InSAR data.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 (1): 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000834.
Calderón-Macías, C., M. K. Sen, and P. L. Stoffa. 2000. “Artificial neural networks for parameter estimation in geophysics.” Geophys. Prospect. 48 (1): 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00171.x.
Chen, A. L., G. K. Yang, and Z. M. Wu. 2006. “Hybrid discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm for capacitated vehicle routing problem.” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 7 (4): 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.A0607.
Chen, P., and S. M. Shahandashti. 2009. “Hybrid of genetic algorithm and simulated annealing for multiple project scheduling with multiple resource constraints.” Autom. Constr. 18 (4): 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.007.
Dawson, J., and P. Tregoning. 2007. “Uncertainty analysis of earthquake source parameters determined from InSAR: A simulation study.” J. Geophys. Res. 112 (B9): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005209.
Duan, H., Q. Luo, G. Ma, and Y. Shi. 2013. “Hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for multi-UAV formation reconfiguration.” IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 8 (3): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2013.2264577.
Durand, N., and J. M. Alliot. 1999. “A combined Nelder-Mead simplex and genetic algorithm.” In Proc., Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conf. GECCO’99, edited by W. Banzhaf, J. Daida, A. E. Eiben, M. H. Garzon, V. Honavar, M. Jakiela, and R. E. Smith, 1–7. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Feng, W. P., and Z. H. Li. 2010. “A novel hybrid PSO/simplex algorithm for determining earthquake source parameter using InSAR data.” [In Chinese.] Progress Geophys. 25 (4): 1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.04.007.
Funning, G. J., B. Parsons, and T. J. Wright. 2005. “Surface displacements and source parameters of the 2003 Bam (Iran) earthquake from Envisat advanced synthetic aperture radar imagery.” J. Geophys. Res. 110 (B9): 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003338.
Ge, H. W., W. L. Du, and F. Qian. 2007. “A hybrid algorithm based on particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing for job shop scheduling.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., Int. Conf. on Natural Computation IEEE Computer Society, 715–719. New York: IEEE.
Hendrix, E. M. T., and B. G. Tóth. 2010. Introduction to nonlinear and global optimization. Berlin: Springer.
Holland, J. H. 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Jamili, A., M. A. Shafia, and R. Tavakkolimoghaddam. 2011. “A hybrid algorithm based on particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing for a periodic job shop scheduling problem.” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 54 (1): 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2932-8.
Jie, X., and Z. Tao. 2015. “Multi-objective particle swarm inversion algorithm for two-dimensional magnetic data.” Appl. Geophys. 12 (2): 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-015-0486-0.
Juang, C. 2004. “A hybrid of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for recurrent network design.” Syst. Man Cybern. 34 (2): 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2003.818557.
Junghans, L., and N. Darde. 2015. “Hybrid single objective genetic algorithm coupled with the simulated annealing optimization method for building optimization.” Energy Build. 86 (Jan): 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.039.
Kao, Y., and E. Zahara. 2008. “A hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for multimodal functions.” Appl. Soft Comput. 8 (2): 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2007.07.002.
Keller, H. B., and D. J. Perozzi. 1983. “Fast seismic ray tracing.” SIAM J. Appl. Math. 43 (4): 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1137/0143064.
Kennedy, J. 2011. “Particle swarm optimization.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., 1995 IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, 1942–1948. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_630.
Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Celatt, and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. “Optimization by simulated annealing.” Science 220 (4598): 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671.
Kumar, S., and O. P. Singh. 2010. “Numerical Inversion of the Abel integral equation using homotopy perturbation method.” Z. Naturforsch. A: Phys. Sci. 65 (8–9): 677–682. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2010-8-908.
Lazzus, J. A., I. Salfate, and S. Montecinos. 2014. “Hybrid neural network-particle swarm algorithm to describe chaotic time series.” Neural Networks World 24 (6): 601–617. https://doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2014.24.034.
Li, W. D., S. K. Ong, and Y. C. Nee. 2002. “Hybrid genetic algorithm and simulated annealing approach for the optimization of process plans for prismatic parts.” Int. J. Prod. Res. 40 (8): 1899–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110119991.
Li, Z., W. Feng, Z. Xu, and P. Cross. 2008. “The 1998 Mw 5.7 Zhangbei-Shangyi (China) earthquake revisited: A buried thrust fault revealed with interferometric synthetic aperture radar.” Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 9 (4): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2014.24.034.
Marquardt, D. W. 1963. “An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters.” J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11 (2): 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1137/0111030.
Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. “Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines.” J. Chem. Phys. 21 (6): 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114.
Meza, J. C. 2010. “Steepest descent.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2 (6): 719–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.117.
Nazareth, J. L. 2009. “Conjugate gradient method.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 1 (3): 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.13.
Nelder, J. A., and R. Mead. 1965. “A Simplex method for function minimization.” Comput. J. 7 (4): 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308.
Okada, Y. 1985. “Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 75 (4): 1135–1154.
Okada, Y. 1992. “Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82 (2): 1018–1040.
Oreski, S., D. Oreski, and G. Oreski. 2012. “Hybrid system with genetic algorithm and artificial neural networks and its application to retail credit risk assessment.” Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (16): 12605–12617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.023.
Parker, R. L. 1977. “Understanding inverse theory.” Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 5 (1): 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.05.050177.000343.
Rachid, C., and S. Patrick. 2003. “Genetic and Nelder-Mead algorithms hybridized for a more accurate global optimization of continuous multiminima functions.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 148 (2): 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00401-0.
Rothman, D. H. 1985. “Nonlinear inversion, statistical mechanics, and residual statics estimation.” Geophysics 50 (12): 2784–2796. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441899.
Sadollah, A., H. Sayyaadi, and A. Yadav. 2018. “A dynamic metaheuristic optimization model inspired by biological nervous systems: Neural network algorithm.” Appl. Soft Comput. 71 (Oct): 747–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.07.039.
Shi, X. M., J. Y. Wang, Y. Y. Yi, X. X. Yuan, X. M. Wang, and Y. S. Zhang. 2007. “A study on the simulated atomic transition algorithm for geophysical inversion.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Geophys. 50 (1): 305–312. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2007.01.038.
Shibutani, T., M. Sambridge, and B. Kennett. 2013. “Genetic algorithm inversion for receiver functions with application to crust and uppermost mantle structure beneath eastern Australia.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 23 (14): 1829–1832. https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL01671.
Spendley, W., G. R. Hext, and F. R. Himsworth. 1962. “Sequential application of simplex designs in optimisation and evolutionary operation.” Technometrics 4 (4): 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1962.10490033.
Steketee, J. A. 1958. “On Volterra’s dislocations in a semi-infinite elastic medium.” Can. J. Phys. 36 (2): 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1139/p58-024.
Stoffa, P. L., and M. K. Sen. 1991. “Nonlinear multi-parameter optimization using genetic algorithms; inversion of plane-wave seismograms.” Geophysics 56 (11): 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442992.
Tsai, J., C. Jyhhorng, and L. Tungkuan. 2006. “Tuning the structure and parameters of a neural network by using hybrid Taguchi-genetic algorithm.” IEEE Trans. Neural Network 17 (1): 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2005.860885.
Vasco, D. W. 1994. “Singularity and branching: A path-following formalism for geophysical inverse problems.” Geophys. J. Int. 119 (3): 809–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1994.tb04019.x.
Wang, L. Y., and R. Ding. 2020a. “A parameter determination method of unscented transformation and its approximate ability analysis in the precision estimation of nonlinear measurement adjustment.” Measurement 166 (Dec): 108065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108065.
Wang, L. Y., and R. Ding. 2020b. “Inversion and precision estimation of earthquake fault parameters based on scaled unscented transformation and hybrid PSO/Simplex algorithm with GPS measurement data.” Measurement 153 (Mar): 107422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107422.
Wang, L. Y., H. Gao, and G. C. Feng. 2017. “InSAR and GPS earthquake source parameter inversion for the 2016 Mw6.4 meinong, Taiwan earthquake.” Chin. J. Geophys. 60 (4): 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.30051.
Wang, L. Y., F. B. Yu, Z. Q. Li, and C. Y. Zou. 2020. “Jackknife method for variance components of partial EIV model.” J. Surv. Eng. 146 (4): 04020016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000327.
Wang, L. Y., and Y. W. Zhao. 2018. “Scaled unscented transformation of nonlinear error propagation: Accuracy, sensitivity, and applications.” J. Surv. Eng. 144 (1): 04017022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000243.
Wang, L. Y., and C. Y. Zou. 2019. “Accuracy analysis and applications of the sterling interpolation method for nonlinear function error propagation.” Measurement 146 (Nov): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.06.017.
Wells, D., and K. J. Coppersmith. 1994. “New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84 (4): 974–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00808290.
Wilson, W. G., W. G. Laidlaw, and K. Vasudevan. 1994. “Residual statics estimation using the genetic algorithm.” Geophysics 59 (5): 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443634.
Wright, T. J., Z. Lu, and C. W. Wicks. 2004. “Constraining the slip distribution and fault geometry of the Mw 7.9, 3 November 2002, Denali fault earthquake with interferometric synthetic aperture radar and global positioning system data.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94 (6): S175–S189. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040623.
Wright, T. J., B. E. Parsons, J. A. Jackson, M. Haynes, E. J. Fielding, P. C. England, and P. J. Clarke. 1999. “Source parameters of the 1 October 1995 Dinar (Turkey) earthquake from SAR interferometry and seismic bodywave modelling.” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 172 (1): 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00186-7.
Xiao, F. M., and Y. Liu. 2016. “Computing inversion-free mappings by simplex assembly.” ACM Trans. Graphics 35 (6): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/2980179.2980231.
Yin, F., H. Mao, and L. Hua. 2011. “A hybrid of back propagation neural network and genetic algorithm for optimization of injection molding process parameters.” Mater. Des. 32 (6): 3457–3464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.058.
Zahara, E., and Y. T. Kao. 2009. “Hybrid Nelder–Mead simplex search and particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems.” Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2): 3880–3886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.039.
Zhang, J. R., J. Zhang, T. M. Lok, and M. R. Lyu. 2007. “A hybrid particle swarm optimization-back-propagation algorithm for feedforward neural network training.” Appl. Math. Comput. 185 (2): 1026–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.025.
Zhang, L., M. M. Poulton, and T. Wang. 2002. “Borehole electrical resistivity modeling using neural networks.” Geophysics 67 (6): 1790–1797. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1527079.
Zhao, Y. W., and C. J. Xu. 2020. “Adaptive multistart Gauss–Newton approach for geodetic data inversion of earthquake source parameters.” J. Geod. 94 (2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01353-z.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 147Issue 3August 2021

History

Received: Oct 27, 2020
Accepted: Apr 16, 2021
Published online: Jun 10, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 10, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Faculty of Geomatics, East China Univ. of Technology, Nanchang 330013, People’s Republic of China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-2030. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Candidate, Faculty of Geomatics, East China Univ. of Technology, Nanchang 330013, People’s Republic of China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Combined Prediction Model for High-Speed Railway Bridge Pier Settlement Based on Robust Weighted Total Least-Squares Autoregression and Adaptive Dynamic Cubic Exponential Smoothing, Journal of Surveying Engineering, 10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1379, 149, 2, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share