Technical Papers
Oct 31, 2020

New First-Order Approximate Precision Estimation Method for Parameters in an Errors-in-Variables Model

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 1

Abstract

To evaluate the posterior precision of weighted total least-squares (WTLS) estimates in an errors-in-variables model, first-order approximate precision estimation (FOA) methods are usually used. However, FOAs might not be valid if the underlying assumption is invalid, and this assumption has not been sufficiently proven. Therefore, this paper investigates the validity of the latent assumption and proposes a new first-order approximate (NFOA) precision estimation method to avoid the underlying assumption and design a corresponding algorithm. The difference between NFOA and FOA is formulated and analyzed. The proposed NFOA method is tested by a simulated classic straight-line fitting example with six scenarios and a simulated three-dimensional (3D) affine transformation experiment with four scenarios, and the mean values of the standard deviation of true errors (MSDTE) and FOA are also calculated for comparison. The results numerically indicate that NFOA works better than FOA and is close to the MSDTE, which means that NFOA can evaluate the precision of estimated parameters more reasonably and accurately.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
DataSLT_True Data.mat
SLT_DesignedSimulatedPriorVariance_Data1.mat (Scenario I)
SLT_DesignedSimulatedPriorVariance _Data2.mat (Scenario II)
SLT_DesignedSimulatedPriorVariance _Data3.mat (Scenario III)
SLT_DesignedSimulatedPriorVariance _Data4.mat (Scenario IV)
SLT_DesignedSimulatedPriorVariance _Data5.mat (Scenario V)
SLT_DesignedSimulatedPriorVariance _Data6.mat (Scenario VI)
3DAT_Resource_Cood.mat3DAT_Target_Cood.mat
Code1. PEIV.m
2. Demo.m (Example 1: Straight-line Fitting)
3. Demo1.m (Example 2: 3D Affine Transformation)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Amiri-Simkooei and Lecturer Farzaneh for providing the MATLAB code to allow the authors to improve the quality of this paper. The work described in this paper is supported by the Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (19ZR1459700), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0502700), and the Key Laboratory of Advanced Engineering Surveying of the National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation (TJES1802).

References

Akyilmaz, O. 2007. “Total least-squares solution of coordinate transformation.” Surv. Rev. 39 (303): 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1179/003962607X165005.
Amiri-Simkooei, A. R. 2018. “Parameter estimation in 3D affine and similarity: Implementation of variance component estimation.” J. Geod. 92 (11): 1285–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1119-1.
Amiri-Simkooei, A. R., and S. Jazaeri. 2012. “Weighted total least squares formulated by standard least squares theory.” J.Geodetic Sci. 2 (2): 113–124. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-011-0036-5.
Amiri-Simkooei, A. R., and S. Jazaeri. 2013. “Data-snooping procedure applied to errors-in-variables models.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 57 (3): 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-012-0474-2.
Amiri-Simkooei, A. R., S. Mortazavi, and J. Asgari. 2016a. “Weighted total least squares applied to mixed observation model.” Surv. Rev. 48 (349): 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270615Y.0000000031.
Amiri-Simkooei, A. R., F. Zangeneh-Nejad, and J. Asgari. 2016b. “On the covariance matrix of weighted total least-squares estimates.” J. Surv. Eng. 142 (3): 04015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000153.
Box, M. J. 1971. “Bias in nonlinear estimation (with discussions).” J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B (Methodol.) 33 (2): 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1971.tb00871.x.
Even-Tzur, G. 2018. “Invariance property of coordinate transformation.” J. Spatial Sci. 63 (1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2017.1316688.
Fang X. 2011. “Weighted total least squares solution for applications in geodesy.” Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodetic Science, Leibniz Univ. Hanover.
Fang, X. 2013. “Weighted total least squares: Necessary and sufficient conditions, fixed and random parameters.” J. Geod. 87 (8): 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0643-2.
Fang, X. 2015. “Weighted total least-squares with constraints a universal formula for geodetic symmetrical transformations.” J. Geod. 89 (5): 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0790-8.
Fang, X., B. Li, H. Alkhatib, W. Zeng, and Y. Yao. 2016. “Bayesian inference for the Errors-In-Variables model.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 61 (1): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-6107-9.
Golub, G., and C. Van Loan. 1980. “An analysis of the total least-squares problem.” SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 17 (6): 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1137/0717073.
Gustafsson, F., and G. Hendeby. 2012. “Some relations between extended and unscented Kalman filters.” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 60 (2): 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2011.2172431.
Han, J., S. Zhang, Y. Li, and X. Zhang. 2018. “A general partial errors-in-variables model and a corresponding weighted total least-squares algorithm.” Surv. Rev. 52 (371): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2018.1530332.
Jazaeri, S., A. R. Amiri-Simkooei, and M. A. Sharifi. 2014. “Iterative algorithm for weighted total least squares adjustment.” Surv. Rev. 46 (334): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270613Y.0000000052.
Jin, Y., X. Tong, L. Li, S. Zhang, and S. Liu. 2018. “Partial total-least-squares adjustment of condition equations with application to a rectangular building adjustment in a GIS.” J. Surv. Eng. 144 (1): 04017021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000246.
Koch, K. 1999. Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.
Mahboub, V. 2012. “On weighted total least-squares for geodetic transformations.” J. Geod. 86 (5): 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0524-5.
Mahboub, V., S. Ebrahimzadeh, M. Saadatseresht, and M. Faramarzi. 2018. “On robust constrained Kalman filter for dynamic errors-in-variables model.” Surv. Rev. 52 (371): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2018.1547863.
Mercan, H., O. Akyilmaz, and C. Aydin. 2018a. “Correction to: Solution of the weighted symmetric similarity transformations based on quaternions.” J. Geod. 92 (10): 1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1174-7.
Mercan, H., O. Akyilmaz, and C. Aydin. 2018b. “Solution of the weighted symmetric similarity transformations based on quaternions.” J. Geod. 92 (10): 1113–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1104-0.
Schaffrin, B., and Y. A. Felus. 2005. “On total least-squares adjustment with constraints.” In Proc., Int. Association of Geodesy: A Window on the Future of Geodesy, edited by F. Sansò, 417–421. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27432-4_71.
Schaffrin, B., and K. Snow. 2010. “Total least-squares regularization of Tykhonov type and an ancient racetrack in Corinth.” Linear Algebra Appl. 432 (8): 2061–2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2009.09.014.
Schaffrin, B., and K. Snow. 2014. “The case of the homogeneous errors-in-variables model.” J. Geod. Sci. 4 (1): 28–36. https://doi.org/10.2478/jogs-2014-0004.
Schaffrin, B., and A. Wieser. 2008. “On weighted total least squares adjustment for linear regression.” J. Geod. 82 (7): 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0190-9.
Shen, Y., B. Li, and Y. Chen. 2011. “An iterative solution of weighted total least-squares adjustment.” J. Geod. 85 (4): 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0431-1.
Shi, Y., P. Xu, J. Liu, and C. Shi. 2015. “Alternative formulae for parameter estimation in partial errors-in-variables models.” J. Geod. 89 (1): 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0756-2.
Snow, K. 2012. “Topics in total least-squares adjustment within the errors-in-variables model: Singular cofactor matrices and prior information.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State Univ.
Tong, X., Y. Jin, and L. Li. 2011. “An improved weighted total least squares method with applications in linear fitting and coordinate transformation.” J. Surv. Eng. 137 (4): 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000055.
Tong, X., Y. Jin, S. Zhang, L. Li, and S. Liu. 2015. “Bias-corrected weighted total least-squares adjustment of condition equations.” J. Surv. Eng. 141 (2): 04014013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000140.
Wan, E. A., and R. Van Der Merwe. 2001. “The unscented kalman filter.” In Kalman filtering and neural networks, edited by S. Haykin, 221–280. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471221546.ch7.
Wang, L., and Y. Zhao. 2017. “Unscented transformation with scaled symmetric sampling strategy for precision estimation of total least squares.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 61 (3): 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-016-1113-0.
Wang, L., and Y. Zhao. 2019. “Second-order approximation function method for precision estimation of total least squares.” J. Surv. Eng. 145 (1): 04018011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000266.
Xu, P., J. Liu, and C. Shi. 2012. “Total least squares adjustment in partial errors-in-variables models: Algorithm and statistical analysis.” J. Geod. 86 (8): 661–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0552-9.
Xu, P., J. Liu, W. Zeng, and Y. Shen. 2014. “Effects of errors-in-variables on weighted least squares estimation.” J. Geod. 88 (7): 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0716-x.
Zeng, W., X. Fang, Y. Lin, X. Huang, and Y. Zhou. 2018. “On the total least-squares estimation for autoregressive model.” Surv. Rev. 50 (359): 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2017.1281096.
Zhang, S., and K. Zhang. 2014a. “Corrigendum to ‘On a basic multivariate EIV model with linear equality constraints.” Appl. Math. Comput. 265: 1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.06.001.
Zhang, S., and K. Zhang. 2014b. “On a basic multivariate EIV model with linear equality constraints.” Appl. Math. Comput. 236 (Jun): 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.03.046.
Zhang, S., K. Zhang, and P. Liu. 2016. “Total least-squares estimation for 2D affine coordinate transformation with constraints on physical parameters.” J. Surv. Eng. 142 (3): 04016009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000180.
Zhou, Y., and X. Fang. 2016. “A mixed weighted least squares and weighted total least squares adjustment method and its geodetic applications.” Surv. Rev. 48 (351): 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270615Y.0000000040.
Zhou, Y., X. Kou, J. Zhu, and J. Li. 2014. “A Newton algorithm for weighted total least-squares solution to a specific errors-in-variables model with correlated measurements.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 58 (3): 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-013-0254-7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 147Issue 1February 2021

History

Received: Sep 19, 2019
Accepted: Jun 24, 2020
Published online: Oct 31, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, College of Surveying and Geo-Infomatics, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 20092, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3376-3592. Email: [email protected]
Songlin Zhang [email protected]
Professor, College of Surveying and Geo-Infomatics, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 20092, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Master’s Student, College of Surveying and Geo-Infomatics, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 20092, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-0141. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share