Technical Papers
Apr 18, 2020

Comparative Review of Molodensky–Badekas and Burša–Wolf Methods for Coordinate Transformation

Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 3

Abstract

J. Badekas reinterpreted M. S. Molodensky’s three-dimensional similarity transformation as a vector solution using a centroid. The solution has since been (mis)interpreted by some others with inconsistent reference to the methods of both Molodensky and Badekas, principally relating to the translation vector and the stochastic model. This appears to have led to incorrect claims that the Molodensky–Badekas method is superior to the Helmert similarity and Burša–Wolf methods. This paper reviews the development and description of the original Badekas method, reconfirming its equivalence to the Burša–Wolf method in the forward direction, and provides an alternative solution that suits the same-formula reversal common in commercial surveying software. It is also demonstrated that the Molodensky–Badekas method has no inherent superiority over the Burša–Wolf method, has an ambiguous functional model, and nominally underestimates its parameter statistics when these are compared directly with those from the Burša–Wolf method.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the reviewers for their insight and detailed critiques that improved this paper. The first author would also like to acknowledge the contribution of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship in supporting this research.

References

Annan, R., Y. Ziggah, J. Ayer, and C. Odutola. 2016. “Hybridized centroid technique for 3D Molodensky–Badekas coordinate transformation in the Ghana geodetic reference network using total least squares approach.” South Afr. J. Geomatics 5 (3): 269–284. https://doi.org/10.431/sajg.v5i3.1.
Ansari, K., O. Corumluoglu, and M. Yetkin. 2017. “Projectivity, affine, similarity and Euclidean coordinates transformation parameters from ITRF to EUREF in Turkey.” J. Appl. Geodesy 11 (1): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2016-0040.
Appelbaum, L. 1982. “Geodetic datum transformation by multiple regression equations.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Geodetic Symp. on Satellite Doppler Positioning. St. Louis: Defense Mapping Agency Aerospace Center.
Badekas, J. 1969. Investigation related to the establishment of a world geodetic system.. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ.
Blewitt, G. 1998. “GPS data processing methodology: From theory to applications.” In GPS for geodesy, edited by A. Kleusberg and P. Teunissen, 231–270. Berlin: Springer.
Burford, B. 1985. “A further examination of datum transformation parameters in Australia.” Aust. Surveyor 32 (7): 536–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050326.1985.10435175.
Bursa, M. 1962. “The theory for the determination of the non-parallelism of the minor axis of the reference ellipsoid and the inertial polar axis of the Earth, and the planes of the initial astronomic and geodetic meridians from the observation of artificial Earth satellites.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 6: 209–214.
Chang, G. 2015. “On least-squares solution to 3D similarity transformation problem under Gauss-Helmert model.” J. Geodesy 89 (6): 573–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0799-z.
EPSG. 2019. “Welcome to the EPSG geodetic parameter dataset.” Accessed April 19, 2019. http://www.epsg-registry.org.
Grossman, S. 1980. Elementary linear algebra. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Harvey, B. 1985. The combination of VLBI and ground data for geodesy and geophysics. Kensington, NSW, Australia: Univ. of NSW.
Helmert, F. 1876. “Die Genauigkeit der Formel von Peters zur Berechnung des wahrscheinlichen Beobachtungsfehlers directer Beobachtungen gleicher Genauigkeit.” Astron. Nachr. 88 (8–9): 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.18760880802.
Iliffe, J., and R. Lott. 2008. Datums and map projections for remote sensing, GIS and surveying. 2nd ed. Caithness, UK: Whittles Publishing.
IOGP (International Association of Oil and Gas Producers). 2018. Coordinate conversions and transformations including formulas. GN-373-7-2. London: IOGP.
Krakiwsky, E., and D. Thomson. 1974. “Mathematical models for the combination of terrestrial and satellite networks.” Can. Surveyor 28 (5): 606–615. https://doi.org/10.1139/tcs-1974-0105.
Kutoglu, H., C. Mekik, and H. Akcin. 2002. “A comparison of two well known models for 7-parameter transformation.” Aust. Surveyor 47 (1): 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050356.2002.10558839.
Leick, A. 1995. GPS satellite surveying. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Leick, A., and B. van Gelder. 1975. On similarity transformation and geodetic network distortions based on Doppler satellite observations. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ.
Lott, R. 2011. “On the description of coordinate reference systems.” Surv. Rev. 43 (319): 105. https://doi.org/10.1179/sre.2011.43.319.105.
Malys, S. 1988. Dispersion and correlation among transformation parameters relating two satellite reference frames. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ.
Mikhail, E., and F. Ackermann. 1976. Observations and least squares. New York: University Press of America.
Modenov, P., and A. Parkhomenko. 1966. Vol. 2 of Geometric transformations. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Molodensky, M., F. Eremeev, and M. Yurkina. 1962. Methods for study of the external gravitational field and figure of the Earth. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations.
NGA (National Geospatial Intelligence Agency). 2014. Department of Defense world geodetic system 1984: Its definition and relationships with local geodetic systems. St. Louis: NGA.
NGA (National Geospatial Intelligence Agency). 2019. “Molodensky-Badekas (7+3) transformations.” Accessed April 21, 2019. https://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/coordsys/datums/molodensky.html.
Pearse, M. B., and C. Crook. 1997. Geodetic system technical report: Recommended transformation parameters from WGS84 to NZGD49. Wellington, New Zealand: Land Information New Zealand.
Petit, G., and B. Luzum. 2010. IERS conventions (2010). Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie.
Rapp, R. 1993. Vol. 2 of Geometric geodesy. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ.
Reit, B. 2009. On geodetic transformations. Gävle, Sweden: Lantmäteriet.
Ruffhead, A. C. 2018. “Introduction to multiple regression equations in datum transformations and their reversibility.” Survey Rev. 50 (358): 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2016.1244143.
Ruffhead, A. C. 2019. “Derivation of rigorously-conformal 7-parameter 3D geodetic datum transformations.” Survey Rev. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2019.1665614.
Sanchez, L. 2004. Aspectos procticos de la adopcion del marco geocéntrico nacional de referencia MAGNA SIRGAS como Datum oficial de Colombia. Bogota, Colombia: Instituto Geografico Agustin Codazzi.
Seppelin, T. 1974. “The Department of Defense world geodetic system 1972.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Problems Related to the Redefinition of North American Geodetic Networks. Washington, DC: Defense Mapping Agency.
Soler, T. 1976. On differential transformations between Cartesian and curvilinear (geodetic) coordinates. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ.
Soler, T., and R. Snay. 2004. “Transforming positions and velocities between the international terrestrial reference frame of 2000 and North American datum of 1983.” J. Surv. Eng. 130 (2): 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2004)130:2(49).
Toms, R., and C. Kellough. 2006. Guidelines for the development of efficient algorithms for spatial operations. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Turgut, B. 2010. “A back-propagation artificial neural network approach for three-dimensional coordinate transformation.” Sci. Res. Essays 5 (21): 3330–3335.
Varga, M., M. Grgić, and T. Bašić. 2017. “Empirical comparison of the geodetic coordinate transformation models: A case study of Croatia.” Surv. Rev. 49 (352): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2015.1104092.
Veis, G. 1960. “Geodetic uses of artificial satellites.” In Vol. 3 of Smithsonian contributions to astrophysics, 74. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
War Department. 1944. Military occupational classification of enlisted personnel. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
Wolf, H. 1963. “Geometric connection and re-orientation of three-dimensional triangulation nets.” Bull. Géodésique 68 (1): 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02526150.
Yun, H. S., D. S. Song, and J. M. Cho. 2006. “Horizontal datum transformation by distortion modelling in Korea.” Surv. Rev. 38 (301): 554–562. https://doi.org/10.1179/sre.2006.38.301.554.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 146Issue 3August 2020

History

Received: Jun 25, 2019
Accepted: Jan 3, 2020
Published online: Apr 18, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M.Phil. Candidate, School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin Univ. of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3879-7698
W. E. Featherstone [email protected]
Professor, School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin Univ. of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share