Practical Formulas for the Refraction Coefficient
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 2
Abstract
Knowledge of the actual refraction coefficient is essential in leveling surveys and precise electromagnetic distance measurement reduction. The most common method followed by the surveyor for its determination is based on the use of simultaneous reciprocal zenith observations. The commonly used formula is only an approximation valid for approximately horizontal sightings, whereas the exact geometric solution turns out to be very complicated so that an iterative computation procedure is suggested instead. In the present paper, the goal is to derive a compact formula from the complete solution that is easy to implement and retains the necessary accuracy for horizontal and slanted sightings. In addition, the paper will also focus on the common situation for the surveyor where isolated observations have to be done and no partially compensating procedures—e.g., leap-frog or middle point—are possible. If temperature vertical profiles are unknown then the refraction coefficient cannot be reliably determined. Some surveyors may customarily use then an average value, e.g., , perhaps being unaware of the risks involved in such simplistic assumption. In the present paper, it is also a goal to present a useful and simple formula for approximately estimating the refraction coefficient in terms of easily accessible parameters to correct the bulk of the refraction effect in single observations, always bearing in mind that determination of the refraction coefficient by means of a model may turn out to be somewhat inaccurate, but still better than the blind use of a universal .
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions, corrections, and comments that helped improve the original manuscript. This research is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Grant No. AYA2011-23232).
References
Angus-Leppan, P. V. (1980). “Refraction in leveling: Extension to the stable and neutral atmospheric conditions.” Proc., 2nd Symp. Problems Related to the Redefinition of North American Vertical Geodetic Network, Canadian Institute of Surveying, Ottawa, 677–690.
Brunner, F. K., ed. (1984). Geodetic refraction: Effects of electromagnetic wave propagation through the atmosphere, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Ceylan, A., and Baykal, O. (2006). “Precise height determination using leap-frog trigonometric leveling.” J. Surv. Eng., 118–123.
Dodson, A. H., and Zaher, M. (1985). “Refraction effects on vertical angle measurements.” Surv. Rev., 28(217), 169–183.
Georgakis, C., Santamouris, M., and Kaisarlis, G. (2010). “The vertical stratification of air temperature in the center of Athens.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 49(6), 1219–1232.
Hirt, C., Guillaume, S., Wisbar, A., Bürki, B., and Sternberg, H. (2010). “Monitoring of the refraction coefficient in the lower atmosphere using a controlled set-up of simultaneous reciprocal vertical angle measurements.” J. Geophys. Res., 115(D21), D21102.
Holdahl, S. R. (1981). “A model of temperature stratification for correction of leveling refraction.” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Tech. Memo. National Ocean Survey (NOS) National Geodetic Survey (NGS) No. 31, NOAA, Rockville, MD.
Ingensand, H. (2008). “Concepts and solutions to overcome the refraction problem in terrestrial precision measurements.” Geod. Cartogr. 34(2), 61–65.
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG). (1999). “Resolutions adopted at the XXII General Assembly by the IUGG Associations.” Proc., Univ. of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K., 110–111.
Kharaghani, G. A. (1987). “Propagation of refraction errors in trigonometric height traversing and geodetic levelling.” Tech. Rep. No. 132, Dept. of Surveying Engineering, Univ. of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Kukkamäki, T. J. (1938). “Uber die nivellitische refraction.” Pub. No. 25, Finnish Geodetic Institute, Helsinki, Finland (in German).
Tait, G. W. C. (1949). “The vertical temperature gradient in the lower atmosphere under daylight conditions.” Quar. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 75(325), 287–292.
Torge, W. (2001). Geodesy, 3rd Ed., de Gruyter, Berlin.
Tsoulis, D., Petrovic, S., and Kilian, N. (2008). “Theoretical and numerical aspects of the geodetic method for determining the atmospheric refraction coefficient using simultaneous and mutual zenith observations.” J. Surv. Eng., 3–12.
Webb, E. K. (1969). “The temperature structure of the lower atmosphere.” Proc., Conf. Refraction Effects in Geodesy and Conf. Electronic Distance Measurement, Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 1–9.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 140 • Issue 2 • May 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 14, 2013
Accepted: Sep 5, 2013
Published online: Sep 7, 2013
Published in print: May 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jul 13, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.