Technical Papers
Jul 9, 2022

Real-Time Hybrid Simulation with Polynomial Chaos NARX Modeling for Seismic Response Evaluation of Structures Subjected to Stochastic Ground Motions

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 9

Abstract

Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) provides an efficient and effective experimental technique for rate-dependent energy-dissipation devices in seismic hazard mitigation. The structure under investigation is generally divided into analytical and physical substructures to enable large-scale experiments for system behavior. Accurate modeling of analytical substructures is critical for truthful structural response replication through RTHS. This presents challenges to laboratory practice of RHTS such as capability of specialized finite-element software to replicate complex nonlinear behavior, and the equipment capacity to accommodate large-scale finite-element modeling to be executed in a real-time manner. This study explores the use of a polynomial chaos nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input (PC-NARX) model to conduct RTHS in laboratories using existing equipment and general-purpose finite-element analysis (FEA) software readily available in earthquake engineering research. The NARX model can be trained using any existing FEA software for a good representation of structural dynamics. Polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) is then introduced to surrogate NARX model coefficients to account for ground motion uncertainties. Laboratory tests of a self-centering viscous damper were conducted as proof of concept to experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of RTHS with PC-NARX metamodeling approach. The results were further compared with the kriging surrogate technique for NARX model coefficients to explore a better technique to account for uncertainties in RTHS.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China under Grant No. 2018YFE0206100.

References

Abbiati, G., I. Lanese, E. Cazzador, O. S. Bursi, and A. Pavase. 2019. “A computational framework for fast-time hybrid simulation based on partitioned time integration and state space modeling.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 26 (7): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2419.
Abbiati, G., S. Marelli, O. S. Bursi, B. Sudret, and B. Stojadinovic. 2015. “Uncertainty propagation and global sensitivity analysis in hybrid simulation using polynomial chaos expansion.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Soft Computing Technology in Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering. Stirlingshire, UK: Civil-Comp Press.
Abbiati, G., S. Marelli, N. Tsokanas, B. Sudret, and B. Stojadinović. 2021. “A global sensitivity analysis framework for hybrid simulation.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 146 (Jan): 106997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106997.
Abebe, A. J., and R. K. Price. 2004. “Information theory and neural networks for managing uncertainty in flood routing.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 18 (4): 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2004)18:4(373).
Bas, E. E., and M. A. Moustafa. 2020a. “Communication development and verification for python-based machine learning models for real-time hybrid simulation.” Front. Built Environ. 6: 574965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.574965.
Bas, E. E., and M. A. Moustafa. 2020b. “Real-time hybrid simulation with deep learning computational substructures: System validation using linear specimens.” Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2 (4): 469–489. https://doi.org/10.3390/make2040026.
Billings, S. A. 2013. Nonlinear system identification: NARMAX methods in the time, frequency, and spatio-temporal domains. 1st ed. New York: Wiley.
Billings, S. A., S. Chen, and M. J. Korenberg. 1989. “Identification of MIMO non-linear systems using a forward-regression orthogonal estimator.” Int. J. Control 49 (6): 2157–2189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207178908559767.
Blakeborough, A., M. S. Williams, A. P. Darby, and D. M. Williams. 2001. “The development of real-time substructure testing.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 359 (1786): 1869–1891. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2001.0877.
Blatman, G., and B. Sudret. 2010. “An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 25 (2): 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.10.003.
Castaneda, N., X. Gao, and S. J. Dyke. 2015. “Computational tool for real-time hybrid simulation of seismically excited steel frame structures.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 29 (3): 04014049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000341.
Chae, Y., S. Tong, T. M. Marullo, and J. M. Riclse. 2012. “Real-time hybrid simulation studies of complex large-scale systems using multi-grid processing.” In Proc., 20th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conf., 359–370. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chen, C., and J. M. Ricles. 2008. “Development of direct integration algorithms for structural dynamics using discrete control theory.” J. Eng. Mech. 134 (8): 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:8(676).
Chen, C., and J. M. Ricles. 2009. “Analysis of actuator delay compensation methods for real-time testing.” Eng. Struct. 31 (11): 2643–2655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.012.
Chen, C., and J. M. Ricles. 2010. “Tracking error-based servohydraulic actuator adaptive compensation for real-time hybrid simulation.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (4): 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000124.
Chen, C., J. M. Ricles, and T. Guo. 2012. “Improved adaptive inverse compensation technique for real-time hybrid simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (12): 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000450.
Chen, C., J. M. Ricles, T. M. Marullo, and O. Mercan. 2009. “Real-time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (1): 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.838.
Chen, S., S. A. Billings, and P. M. Grant. 1990. “Non-linear system identification using neural networks.” Int. J. Control 51 (6): 1191–1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179008934126.
Cornell, C. A., and H. Krawinkler. 2000. “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.” PEER Center News 3 (2): 1–3.
Cremen, G., and J. W. Baker. 2021. “Variance-based sensitivity analyses and uncertainty quantification for FEMA P-58 consequence predictions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (3): 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3370.
Darby, A. P., A. Blakeborough, and M. S. Williams. 1999. “Real-time substructure tests using hydraulic actuators.” J. Eng. Mech. 125 (10): 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:10(1133).
Dimitrov, N., M. C. Kelly, A. Vignaroli, and J. Berg. 2018. “From wind to loads: Wind turbine site-specific load estimation using databases with high-fidelity load simulations.” Wind Energy Sci. 3: 767–790. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-3-767-2018.
Dong, B. P., R. Sause, and J. M. Ricles. 2015. “Accurate real-time hybrid earthquake simulations on large-scale MDOF steel structure with nonlinear viscous dampers.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (12): 2035–2055. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2572.
Duan, Y. F., J. J. Tao, H. M. Zhang, S. M. Wang, and C. B. Yun. 2019. “Real-time hybrid simulation based on vector form intrinsic finite element and field programmable gate array.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 26 (1): e2277. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2277.
Dueñas-Osorio, L., J. I. Craig, and B. J. Goodno. 2007. “Seismic response of critical interdependent networks.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (2): 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.626.
Efron, B., T. Hastie, I. Johnstone, and R. Tibshirani. 2004. “Least angle regression.” Ann. Stat. 32 (2): 407–499. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000000067.
Friedman, A., et al. 2015. “Large-scale real-time hybrid simulation for evaluation of advanced damping system performance.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (6): 04014150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001093.
Gao, X. S., H. T. Hou, L. Huang, G. Q. Yu, and C. Chen. 2021. “Evaluation of kriging-NARX modeling for uncertainty quantification of nonlinear SDOF systems with degradation.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 21 (4): 2150060. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455421500607.
Gao, X. Y., N. Castaneda, and S. J. Dyke. 2014. “Experimental validation of a generalized procedure for MDOF real-time hybrid simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 140 (4): 04013006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000696.
Gerritsma, M., J. B. V. D. Steen, P. Vos, and G. Karniadakis. 2010. “Time-dependent generalized polynomial chaos.” J. Comput. Phys. 229 (22): 8333–8363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.07.020.
Günay, S., and K. M. Mosalam. 2013. “PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology, revisited.” J. Earthquake Eng. 17 (6): 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.787377.
Guo, T., C. Chen, W. Xu, and F. Sanchez. 2014. “A frequency response analysis approach for quantitative assessment of actuator tracking for real-time hybrid simulation.” Smart Mater. Struct. 23 (4): 045042. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/4/045042.
Hayati, S., and W. Song. 2018. “Design and performance evaluation of an optimal discrete-time feedforward controller for servo-hydraulic compensation.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (2): 04017163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001399.
Helton, J. C., and F. J. Davis. 2003. “Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 81 (1): 23–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00058-9.
Hilber, H. M., T. J. R. Hughes, and R. L. Taylor. 1977. “Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural mechanics.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 5 (3): 283–292.
Huang, L., C. Chen, T. Guo, and X. Gao. 2020. “Stability analysis of real-time hybrid simulation with time-varying delay through a delay decomposition approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 146 (10): 04020109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001835.
Jung, R. Y., P. B. Shing, E. Stauffer, and B. Thoen. 2007. “Performance of a real-time pseudodynamic test system considering nonlinear structural response.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (12): 1785–1809. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.722.
Karavasilis, T. L., C. Y. Seo, and J. M. Ricles. 2008. HybridFEM: A program for dynamic time history analysis of 2D inelastic framed structures and real-time hybrid simulation hybridFEM version 4.2.4 user’s manual. Bethlehem, PA: ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh Univ.
Kolay, C., and J. M. Ricles. 2014. “Development of a family of unconditionally stable explicit direct integration algorithms with controllable numerical energy dissipation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (9): 1361–1380. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2401.
Kundu, A., and S. Adhikari. 2014. “Transient response of structural dynamic systems with parametric uncertainty.” J. Eng. Mech. 140 (2): 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000643.
Leontaritis, I. J., and S. A. Billings. 1985. “Input-output parametric models for non-linear systems. Part II: Stochastic non-linear systems.” Int. J. Control 41 (2): 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020718508961130.
Mai, C. V. 2016. “Polynomial chaos expansions for uncertain dynamical systems applications in earthquake engineering.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich.
Mai, C. V., and B. Sudret. 2017. “Surrogate models for oscillatory systems using sparse polynomial chaos expansions and stochastic time warping.” SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif. 5 (1): 540–571. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1083621.
Marelli, S., and B. Sudret. 2014. “UQLab: A framework for uncertainty quantification in MATLAB.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk: Quantification, Mitigation, and Management, 2554–2563. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Matheron, G. 1963. “Principles of geostatistics.” Econ. Geol. 58 (8): 1246–1266. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246.
Mckenna, F., and G. L. Fenves. 2013. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES). Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Montgomery, D. C. 2017. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: Wiley.
Nakashima, M., T. Kaminosomo, I. Ishida, and K. Ando. 1990. “Integration techniques for substructure pseudo dynamic test.” In Proc., 4th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 515–524. Palm Springs, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Rezaeian, S., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2010. “Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39 (10): 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.997.
Saouma, V., G. Haussmann, D. H. Kang, and W. Ghannoum. 2014. “Real-time hybrid simulation of a non-ductile reinforced concrete frame.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (2): 04013059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000813.
Shao, X., A. Mueller, and B. A. Mohammed. 2016. “Real-time hybrid simulation with online model updating: Methodology and implementation.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (2): 04015074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000987.
Sheppard, C. 1969. “Computer simulation of stochastic processes through model-sampling (Monte Carlo) techniques.” Supplement, FEBS Lett. 2 (S1): S14–S21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(69)80071-2.
Smola, A. J., and B. Schölkopf. 2004. “A tutorial on support vector regression.” Stat. Comput. 14 (3): 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88.
Spiridonakos, M. D., and E. N. Chatzi. 2015. “Metamodeling of dynamic nonlinear structural systems through polynomial chaos NARX models.” Comput. Struct. 157 (Sep): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.002.
Wan, X., and G. E. Karniadakis. 2005. “An adaptive multi-element generalized polynomial chaos method for stochastic differential equations.” J. Comput. Phys. 209 (2): 617–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.023.
Wu, B., Q. Y. Wang, P. B. Shing, and J. P. Ou. 2007. “Equivalent force control method for generalized real-time substructure testing with implicit integration.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (9): 1127–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.674.
Xu, W. J., C. Chen, T. Guo, and M. H. Chen. 2019. “Evaluation of frequency evaluation index based compensation for benchmark study in real-time hybrid simulation.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 130 (Sep): 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.05.039.
Zhang, R. Y., B. M. Phillips, S. Taniguchi, M. Ikenaga, and K. Ikago. 2017. “Shake table real-time hybrid simulation techniques for the performance evaluation of buildings with inter-story isolation.” Struct. Control Health 24 (10): e1971. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1971.
Zhang, Y. F., R. Sause, J. M. Ricles, and J. N. Clay. 2005. “Modified predictor–corrector numerical scheme for real-time pseudo dynamic tests using state-space formulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (3): 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.425.
Zhu, R., T. Guo, and F. Mwangilwa. 2020. “Development and test of a self-centering fluidic viscous damper.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 23 (13): 2835–2849. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220920464.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 9September 2022

History

Received: Aug 9, 2021
Accepted: May 9, 2022
Published online: Jul 9, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 9, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Univ., Jinan 250061, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-7312. Email: [email protected]
Menghui Chen [email protected]
Graduate Student, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures, Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Engineering, San Francisco State Univ., San Francisco, CA 94132 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9481-7809. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures, Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, China. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures, Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, China. Email: [email protected]
Karlel Cornejo [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Engineering, San Francisco State Univ., San Francisco, CA 94132. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share