Technical Papers
Dec 22, 2021

Simplified Predictive Expressions of Drift Limit States for Reinforced Concrete Circular Bridge Columns

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 3

Abstract

A critical component of performance-based design (PBD) is the quantification of damage states in terms of engineering demand parameters (EDPs). One of the most widely used EDPs to define damage states of reinforced concrete bridge columns is the drift ratio. Here, a fiber-based numerical model was validated by comparing its damage predictions against experimental results for large-scale tests of reinforced concrete columns subjected to reversed cyclic loading. The Monte Carlo sampling technique was adopted to generate 1,000 well-confined and flexure-dominated concrete columns, each having a unique combination of aspect ratio, axial-load ratio, longitudinal and spiral reinforcement ratios, and concrete and reinforcing steel yield strengths. The columns were analyzed numerically under static pushover loading, and the drift ratios corresponding to various strain limits were recorded. The resulting data were fit to mathematical expressions through machine learning–based symbolic regression. The proposed simplified expressions well predicted the drift ratios obtained from the numerical analysis with a minimum square of the correlation coefficient of 0.88. Also, the predicted drift ratios from the proposed expressions were comparable to those measured experimentally at key damage states, such as concrete cover spalling, concrete core crushing, and bar buckling. In particular, the predictions of the proposed expression at rebar buckling, which was based on a reinforcing steel tensile strain of 0.05, were more accurate than two widely used expressions found in the literature. Finally, the application of the proposed expressions within the context of PBD was demonstrated by a numerical example. The proposed simplified expressions are not intended to replace pushover or nonlinear time history analyses as part of the PBD, but rather provide approximate predictions of the limit states, which would significantly facilitate the development of appropriate preliminary designs, especially at early design stages. In addition, since the predictions of the proposed expressions were validated using previous experimental data, they can serve as a benchmark for the bridge engineering community when determining the limit states of reinforced concrete columns through numerical analyses.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The financial contributions of the Green Construction Research & Training Center (GCRTC) at the University of British Columbia (UBC) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) were critical to conduct this research and are gratefully acknowledged.

References

AASHTO. 2014. Guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ASTM. 2016. Standard specification for deformed and plain low-alloy steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM A706/A706M-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Babazadeh, A., R. Burgueño, and P. F. Silva. 2015. “Use of 3D finite-element models for predicting intermediate damage limit states in RC bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (10): 04015012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001253.
Barcley, L., and M. Kowalsky. 2020. “Seismic performance of circular concrete columns reinforced with high-strength steel.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (2): 04019198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002452.
Berry, M. P., and M. O. Eberhard. 2003. Performance models for flexural damage in reinforced concrete columns. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Berry, M. P., and M. O. Eberhard. 2005. “Practical performance model for bar buckling.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (7): 1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:7(1060).
Billah, A. H. M. M., and M. S. Alam. 2016. “Performance-based seismic design of shape memory Alloy–Reinforced concrete bridge piers. I: Development of performance-based damage states.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (12): 04016140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001458.
Calabrese, A., J. P. Almeida, and R. Pinho. 2010. “Numerical issues in distributed inelasticity modeling of RC frame elements for seismic analysis.” Supplement, J. Earthquake Eng. 14 (S1): 38–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632461003651869.
Calderone, A. J., D. E. Lehman, and J. P. Moehle. 2000. Behavior of reinforced concrete bridge columns having varying aspect ratios and varying lengths of confinement. Berkley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
FEMA. 2018. Seismic performance assessment of buildings, volume 1. FEMA P-58-1. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Ghobarah, A. 2001. “Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: State of development.” Eng. Struct. 23 (8): 878–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00036-0.
Goodnight, J. C., Y. Feng, M. Kowalsky, and J. M. Nau. 2015. “The effects of load history and design variables on performance limit states of circular bridge columns.” In Vol. 2 of Experimental observations. Juneau, AK: Alaska DOT & Public Facilities.
Goodnight, J. C., Y. Feng, M. J. Kowalsky, and J. M. Nau. 2012. The effect of load history on reinforced concrete bridge column behavior. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska DOT and Public Facilities.
Goodnight, J. C., M. J. Kowalsky, and J. M. Nau. 2016. “Strain limit states for circular RC bridge columns.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (3): 1627–1652. https://doi.org/10.1193/030315EQS036M.
Hayter, A. 2012. Probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
Hose, Y., P. Silva, and F. Seible. 2000. “Development of a performance evaluation database for concrete bridge components and systems under simulated seismic loads.” Earthquake Spectra 16 (2): 413–442. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586119.
Hwang, H., J. B. Liu, and Y.-H. Chiu. 2001. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges. Memphis, TN: Center for Earthquake Research and Information, Univ. of Memphis.
Kowalsky, M. J. 2000. “Deformation limit states for circular reinforced concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (8): 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(869).
Kunnath, S., A. El-Bahy, A. Taylor, and W. Stone. 1997. Cumulative seismic damage of reinforced concrete bridge piers. Buffalo, NY: National Center of Earthquake Engineering Research.
Kunnath, S. K., Y. Heo, and J. F. Mohle. 2009. “Nonlinear uniaxial material model for reinforcing steel bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (4): 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:4(335).
Lehman, D., J. Moehle, S. Mahin, A. Calderone, and L. Henry. 2004. “Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (6): 869–879. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(869).
Lehman, D. E., and J. P. Moehle. 2000. Seismic performance of well-confined concrete columns. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Marsh, M. L., and S. J. Stringer. 2013. Performance-based seismic bridge design, a synthesis of highway practice. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
McKenna, F., G. L. Fenves, M. H. Scott, and B. Jeremic. 2007. “Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees).” Accessed December 1, 2020. http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
Montgomery, D. C. 2013. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: Wiley.
Murphy, T. P., M. L. Marsh, S. J. Stringer, I. G. Buckle, L. Nicolas, D. Anderson, M. Kowalsky, and J. Restrepo. 2020. Proposed AASHTO guidelines for performance-based seismic bridge design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Nielson, B. G. 2005. “Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
NRC (National Research Council Canada). 2015. National building code of Canada (NBCC). Ottawa: NRC.
Popovics, S. 1973. “A numerical approach to the complete stress strain curve for concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 3 (5): 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3.
Priestley, M. J. N. 2000. “Performance based seismic design.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Upper Hutt, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Priestley, M. J. N., G. M. Calvi, and M. J. Kowalsky. 2007. Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori Press.
Priestley, M. J. N., F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley.
Qi, Y. L., X. Han, and J. Ji. 2013. “Failure mode classification of reinforced concrete column using Fisher method.” J. Cent. South Univ. 20 (10): 2863–2869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1807-1.
Reza, S. M., M. S. Alam, and S. Tesfamariam. 2014. “Lateral load resistance of bridge piers under flexure and shear using factorial analysis.” Eng. Struct. 59 (Feb): 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.009.
Saatcioglu, M., and G. Ozcebe. 1989. “Response of reinforced concrete columns to simulated seismic loading.” ACI Struct. J. 86 (1): 3–12.
Salehi, M., P. Sideris, and A. B. Liel. 2020. “Assessing damage and collapse capacity of reinforced concrete structures using the gradient inelastic beam element formulation.” Eng. Struct. 225 (Dec): 111290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111290.
Schmidt, M., and H. Lipson. 2009. “Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data.” Science 324 (5923): 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165893.
Scott, B., R. Park, and M. Priestley. 1982. “Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates.” ACI Struct. J. 79 (1): 13–27.
Sheikh, S. A., and S. S. Khoury. 1993. “Confined concrete columns with stubs.” ACI Struct. J. 90 (4): 414–431.
Siddiquee, K., and M. S. Alam. 2017. “Highway bridge infrastructure in the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada.” Infrastructures 2 (2): 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures2020007.
Stone, W. C., and G. S. Cheok. 1989. Inelastic behavior of full-scale bridge columns subjected to cyclic loading. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Zhao, J., and S. Sritharan. 2007. “Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures.” ACI Struct. J. 104 (2): 133–141.
Zuluaga Rubio, L. F., Y. LeTartesse, C. Calixte, G. Chancy, and P. Paultre. 2019. “Cyclic behavior of full scale reinforced concrete bridge columns.” In Proc., 12th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: Jan 31, 2021
Accepted: Oct 15, 2021
Published online: Dec 22, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 22, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Saif Aldabagh, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Applied Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Structures (ALAMS), School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V1V7. Email: [email protected]
Faroque Hossain, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Applied Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Structures (ALAMS), School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V1V7. Email: [email protected]
Professor and Tier-1 Principal’s Research Chair in Resilient and Green Infrastructure, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V1V7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-1473. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Performance-Based Seismic Design of Hybrid GFRP–Steel Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-3991, 27, 2, (2023).
  • Machine Learning Models for Predicting Shear Strength and Identifying Failure Modes of Rectangular RC Columns, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12101493, 12, 10, (1493), (2022).
  • Fibre-Based modelling for predicting the progressive collapse of cylindrical shells under combined axial compression and bending moment, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114988, 272, (114988), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share