Technical Papers
Nov 17, 2021

Aerostatic Performance Improvement Based on a Novel Aerodynamic Countermeasure: Simulation and Wind Tunnel Test

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 2

Abstract

Flexible civil structures are prone to aerodynamic instabilities, such as long-span bridges and high-rise buildings, and wind-induced vibration is harmful to structural life-span and users’ comfort. To address this issue, this study proposes a new aerodynamic countermeasure that is designed to improve the structural aerodynamic performance, i.e., adding a strip seam cover device (SSCD) on the surface of a structure, and the influence of the device on the aerostatic performance of the main structure is presented. Taking the box girder of long-span bridges, for example, the effectiveness and influence factors of the proposed device are investigated in detail. First, the proposed device is introduced and three aerostatic force coefficients are selected as the evaluation indices for the SSCD’s effectiveness. Second, the typical streamlined box-girder sectional model of bridges with and without the additional device is compared respectively based on the two-dimensional (2D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation technique. Results show the bridge girder’s pitch moment coefficients can be decreased efficiently. In addition, influences of gap distance (i.e., 30 cm, 60 cm, 90 cm, and 120 cm) between the device and the bridge girder, effective width (i.e., 50 cm, 60 cm, 90 cm, and 180 cm), and void ratio (i.e., 15, 13, 12, 11, 21, and 51) of seams are investigated based on wind tunnel tests. Results of the same cases based on the experiment and CFD simulation are very close, showing the accuracy of the simulation and experiment. Experimental results show that the gap distance is recommended to be 60 to 90 cm, the effective width is 90 cm, and the void ratio is recommended to be a value larger than 11. In this case, the pitch moment value and the slope of the curve for the pitch moment coefficient versus wind attack angle are efficiently reduced, which is beneficial for improving the critical wind speed of aerostatic torsional divergence and aerostatic stability. The proposed device can be used to improve the aerostatic and aerodynamic performances of buildings, bridges, and some other structures; moreover, its potential application in the control of vortex-induced vibration is found preliminarily, which will be reported in further study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778106), Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1907060), and Liaoning BaiQianWan Talents Program. Moreover, the authors express their gratitude to Professor Fuyou Xu from the Dalian University of Technology, China.

References

An, Y. H., C. Q. Wang, S. L. Li, and D. W. Wang. 2016. “Galloping of steepled main cables in long-span suspension bridges during construction.” Wind Struct. 23 (6): 595–613. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2016.23.6.595.
Andersen, M. S., and A. Brandt. 2018. “Aerodynamic instability investigations of a novel, flexible and lightweight triple-box girder design for long-span bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (12): 04018095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001317.
Arul, M., A. Kareem, and D. K. Kwon. 2020. “Identification of vortex-induced vibration of tall building pinnacle using cluster analysis for fatigue evaluation: Application to Burj Khalifa.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (11): 04020234. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002799.
Ayed, S. B., S. A. Ragab, and M. R. Hajj. 2015. “Flow control of extreme pressure loads associated with flow separation.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (2): 04015068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000973.
Bakis, K. N., D. J. N. Limebeer, M. S. Williams, and J. M. R. Graham. 2016a. “Passive aeroelastic control of a suspension bridge during erection.” J. Fluids Struct. 66 (8): 543–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.08.008.
Bakis, K. N., M. Massaro, M. S. Williams, and D. J. N. Limebeer. 2016b. “Aeroelastic control of long-span suspension bridges with controllable winglets.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 23 (12): 1417–1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1839.
Boonyapinyo, V., Y. Lauhatanon, and P. Lukkunaprasit. 2006. “Nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis of suspension bridges.” Eng. Struct. 28 (5): 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.10.008.
Bruno, L., F. Venuti, and V. Nascé. 2012. “Pedestrian-induced torsional vibrations of suspended footbridges: Proposal and evaluation of vibration countermeasures.” Eng. Struct. 36 (Mar): 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.012.
Cheng, J. 2000. “Study on nonlinear aerostatic stability of cable-supported bridges.” [In Chinese.] Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, Tongji Univ.
Cheng, J., J. J. Jiang, R. C. Xiao, and H. F. Xiang. 2002. “Nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis of Jiang Yin suspension bridge.” Eng. Struct. 24 (6): 773–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00006-8.
Ferziger, J. H., M. Perić, and R. L. Street. 2002. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. 3rd ed. New York: Springer.
Fisher, J., and P. Lambert. 2013. “Severn bridge cables—Corrosion models, use of inhibitors and their impact on the cable assessment.” In Proc., 8th Int. Cable Supported Bridge Operators Conf. Edinburgh, UK.
Ge, Y. J., and Y. H. Shao. 2013. “3D nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis for suspension bridges with ultra-long span.” In Proc., 8th Asia-Pacific Conf. on Wind Engineering, edited by N. R. Iyer, P. Krishna, S. S. Rajan, and P. Harikrishna. Chennai, India: Research Publishing.
Ge, Y. J., and H. F. Xiang. 2008. “Bluff body aerodynamics application in challenging bridge span length.” In Proc., 6th Int. Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics and Applications. Milano, Italy: Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics & Applications.
He, X. H., H. Li, H. F. Wang, D. X. Fang, and M. T. Liu. 2017. “Effects of geometrical parameters on the aerodynamic characteristics of a streamlined flat box girder.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 170 (Nov): 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.08.009.
Hirai, A., I. Okauchi, M. Ito, and T. Miyata. 1967. “Studies on the critical wind velocity for suspension bridges.” In Proc., Int. Research Seminar on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hu, C. X., Z. Y. Zhou, and K. J. Yan. 2020. “Wind-induced stability of a cable-stayed bridge with double main spans of 1,500 m and a twin-box section.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (1): 04019135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001501.
Kobayashi, H., and H. Nagaoka. 1992. “Active control of flutter of a suspension bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 41 (1–3): 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90402-V.
Li, H., S. J. Laima, Q. Q. Zhang, N. Li, and Z. Q. Liu. 2014. “Field monitoring and validation of vortex-induced vibrations of a long-span suspension bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 124 (Jan): 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.11.006.
Li, K., Y. J. Ge, Z. W. Guo, and L. Zhao. 2015. “Theoretical framework of feedback aerodynamic control of flutter oscillation for long-span suspension bridges by the twin-winglet system.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 145 (Oct): 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.06.012.
Li, K., L. Zhao, Y. J. Ge, and Z. W. Guo. 2017a. “Flutter suppression of a suspension bridge sectional model by the feedback controlled twin-winglet system.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 168 (Sep): 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.05.007.
Li, S. L., Y. H. An, C. Q. Wang, and D. W. Wang. 2017b. “Experimental and numerical studies on galloping of the flat-topped main cables for the long span suspension bridge during construction.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 163 (Apr): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.01.012.
Li, Y. L., X. Y. Chen, C. J. Yu, K. Togbenou, B. Wang, and L. D. Zhu. 2018. “Effects of wind fairing angle on aerodynamic characteristics and dynamic responses of a streamlined trapezoidal box girder.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 177 (Jun): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.04.006.
Menter, F. R. 1994. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.” AIAA J. 32 (8): 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.
Menter, F. R., M. Kuntz, and R. J. T. Langtry. 2003. “Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model.” Turbul. Heat Mass Transfer 4 (1): 625–632.
Mohammadi, A., A. Azizinamini, L. Griffis, and P. Irwin. 2019. “Performance assessment of an existing 47-story high-rise building under extreme wind loads.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (1): 04018232. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002239.
Montoya, M. C., F. Nieto, S. Hernández, I. Kusano, A. J. Álvarez, and J. Á. Jurado. 2018. “CFD-based aeroelastic characterization of streamlined bridge deck cross-sections subject to shape modifications using surrogate models.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 177 (Jun): 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.014.
Nariman, N. A. 2017. “Control efficiency optimization and Sobol’s sensitivity indices of MTMDs design parameters for buffeting and flutter vibrations in a cable stayed bridge.” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 11 (1): 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0356-8.
Ogawa, K., H. Shimodoi, and T. Oryu. 2002. “Aerodynamic characteristics of a 2-box girder section adaptable for a super-long span suspension bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90 (12–15): 2033–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00319-7.
Ouyang, Z. C., and S. M. J. Spence. 2020. “A performance-based wind engineering framework for envelope systems of engineered buildings subject to directional wind and rain hazards.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (5): 04020049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002568.
Starossek, U., and H. Aslan. 2008. Passive control of bridge deck flutter using tuned mass dampers and control surfaces. In Proc., 7th European Conf. on Structural Dynamics. Southampton, UK: Univ. of Southampton.
Van Doormaal, J. P., and G. D. Raithby. 1984. “Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flows.” Numer. Heat Transfer 7 (2): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495728408961817.
Wang, H., R. M. Hu, J. Xie, T. Tong, and A. Q. Li. 2013. “Comparative study on buffeting performance of Sutong Bridge based on design and measured spectrum.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (7): 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000394.
Wilde, K., and Y. Fujino. 1998. “Aerodynamic control of bridge deck flutter by active surfaces.” J. Eng. Mech. 124 (7): 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:7(718).
Wu, B., Q. Wang, H. L. Liao, and H. Y. Mei. 2020. “Effects of vertical motion on nonlinear flutter of a bridge girder.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (11): 04020093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001637.
Xiang, H. F., and Y. J. Ge. 2005. “On aerodynamic limits to suspension bridges.” [In China.] China Civ. Eng. J. 1: 60–70.
Xiang, H. F., and Y. J. Ge. 2007. “Aerodynamic challenges in span length of suspension bridges.” Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 1 (2): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-007-0016-0.
Xu, F. Y., B. B. Li, C. S. Cai, and Z. Zhang. 2014. “Experimental investigations on aerostatic characteristics of bridge decks under various conditions.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (7): 04014024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000601.
Xu, F. Y., and Z. B. Zhang. 2018. “Numerical simulation of windless-air-induced added mass and damping of vibrating bridge decks.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 180 (Sep): 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.07.011.
Yang, Y. X., R. Zhou, Y. J. Ge, D. Mohotti, and P. Mendis. 2015. “Aerodynamic instability performance of twin box girders for long-span bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 145 (Oct): 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.06.014.
Zahrai, S. M., and M. Froozanfar. 2019. “Performance of passive and active MTMDs in seismic response of Ahvaz cable-stayed bridge.” Smart Struct. Syst. 23 (5): 449–466. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.23.5.449.
Zhou, R., Y. X. Yang, Y. J. Ge, and L. H. Zhang. 2018. “Comprehensive evaluation of aerodynamic performance of twin-box girder bridges with vertical stabilizers.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 175 (Apr): 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.039.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 2February 2022

History

Received: Nov 5, 2020
Accepted: Sep 2, 2021
Published online: Nov 17, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 17, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116023, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-8706. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116023, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1671-6663
Jinping Ou
Professor, Member of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian 116023, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share