Computational Parametric Study on Full-Scale Ultimate Tested Dynamic Message Sign with Welded Connections
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 2
Abstract
Transportation industries have commonly used welded connections in the production of dynamic message signs (DMSs) for several years. Even though with numerous alternatives such as bolt/rivet connections, the majority of the clients prefer welded connections in DMSs. However, the structural behavior of DMSs with welded connections has not been rigorously examined through computational analysis to date. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of computationally investigating the ultimate strength of DMS with welded connections. To achieve this aim, a finite element (FE) model was generated to examine the ultimate strength of the welded DMS tested. The FE model created in ABAQUS software was validated utilizing the testing data and observed an error of 3.33% only for the ultimate strength. Design parameters of the validated FE model such as weld length and damage adjustment factors like tensile yield strength and shear yield strength of filler weld were tuned to identify their influence on the ultimate strength of welded DMS via multiple parametric simulations. The damage adjustment factors were found to be the most influential parameters affecting the ultimate strength of the welded DMS. The parametric simulation studies further revealed that the performance of welded DMS was able to be optimized to improve the ultimate strength of DMS up to 29.95% compared to that of tested DMS. A design equation generated in a statistical manner was also proposed incorporating the most influential parameters to predict the ultimate strength of welded DMS. The design equation showed an average error of 10.46% for the prediction of ultimate strength of welded DMS in comparison to the results of tested DMS.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data collected from the computational study that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors.
References
ABAQUS. 2014. ABAQUS analysis user’s manual. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes Simulia.
Aluminum Association. 2010. Edition of aluminum design manual. Washington, DC: Aluminum Association.
Amatya, I., J. Seo, E. Jeong, and J. Lee. 2021a. “Numerical study for structural performance evaluation of adhesively bonded aluminum dynamic message signs.” Thin-Walled Struct. 159 (Feb): 107193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107193.
Amatya, I., J. Seo, T. Letcher, and J. H. Ahn. 2020. “Peel and cleavage strength tests with adhesive connections in dynamic message signs.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 103 (Dec): 102715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102715.
Amatya, I., J. Seo, T. Letcher, and D. Bierschbach. 2021b. “Tensile-and shear-strength tests with adhesive connections in dynamic message signs.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 33 (6): 04021131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003781.
Arabi, S., B. Shafei, and B. M. Phares. 2018. “Fatigue analysis of sign-support structures during transportation under road-induced excitations.” Eng. Struct. 164 (Jun): 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.031.
ASM (Aerospace Specification Material Inc). 2019a. “Aluminum 5052-H32.” Accessed December 2, 2019. http://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=MA5052H32.
ASM (Aerospace Specification Material Inc). 2019b. “Aluminum 6061-T6; 6061-T651.” Accessed December 2, 2019. http://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=MA6061T6.
ASM International. 2002. “WA.188 6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheet, compressive stress-strain curves.” Accessed April 9, 2020. https://www.asminternational.org/c/portal/pdf/download?articleId=SSTR413A&groupId=10192.
Aure, T. W., and A. M. Ioannides. 2010. “Simulation of crack propagation in concrete beams with cohesive elements in ABAQUS.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2154 (1): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.3141/2154-02.
Cavalli, M. N., M. D. Thouless, and Q. D. Yang. 2005. “Cohesive-zone modelling of the deformation and fracture of spot-welded joints.” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 28 (10): 861–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00919.x.
Chang, B., B. M. Phares, H. Zou, and T. Couch. 2014. “Thermal analysis of highway overhead support structures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2406 (1): 32–41. https://doi.org/10.3141/2406-04.
Grondin, G. Y., A. E. Elwi, and J. J. R. Cheng. 1999. “Buckling of stiffened steel plates—A parametric study.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 50 (2): 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(98)00242-9.
Huckelbridge, A. A., and A. T. Metzger. 2009. “Investigation of the Dayton, Ohio, IR 75 sign truss failure of September 11, 2006.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 23 (5): 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000033.
Inweld. 2021. “ER 4043 3/64 x 16 lb Spool AWS A5.10 4043.” Accessed June 30, 2021. https://inweldcorporation.com/inweld-products/164043046.html.
Khedmati, M. R., and K. Ghavami. 2009. “A numerical assessment of the buckling/ultimate strength characteristics of stiffened aluminium plates with fixed/floating transverse frames.” Thin-Walled Struct. 47 (11): 1373–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2009.03.008.
Lasdon, L. S., R. L. Fox, and M. W. Ratner. 1974. “Nonlinear optimization using the generalized reduced gradient method.” Revue française d’automatique, informatique, recherche opérationnelle. Recherche opérationnelle 8 (3): 73–103. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/197408V300731.
Li, C., H. Ren, Z. Zhu, and C. Guedes Soares. 2015. “FEM analysis of the ultimate strength of aluminum stiffened panels with fixed and floating transverse frames.” In Proc., ASME 2015 34th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Washington, DC: ASME.
Ozturk, F., S. Toros, and S. Kilic. 2008. “Evaluation of tensile properties of 5052 type aluminum-magnesium alloy at warm temperatures.” Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 34 (2): 95–98.
Park, J. S., W. McLean, and J. M. Stallings. 2004. “Wind-induced fatigue of VMS sign structures.” In Structures 2004: Building on the past, securing the future, 1–5. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40700(2004)45.
Park, J. S., and J. M. Stallings. 2006. “Fatigue evaluations of variable message sign structures based on AASHTO specifications.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 10 (3): 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824063.
Paulo, R. M. F., F. Teixeira-Dias, and R. A. F. Valente. 2013. “Numerical simulation of aluminium stiffened panels subjected to axial compression: Sensitivity analyses to initial geometrical imperfections and material properties.” Thin-Walled Struct. 62 (Jan): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.07.024.
Pearson, K. 1992. “On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling.” In Breakthroughs in statistics: Methodology and distribution, 11–28. New York: Springer.
Rice, J. A., D. A. Foutch, J. M. LaFave, and S. Valdovinos. 2012. “Field testing and analysis of aluminum highway sign trusses.” Eng. Struct. 34 (Jan): 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.021.
Seo, J., and I. Amatya. 2021a. “Full-scale fatigue testing of dynamic message sign.” Eng. Struct. 226 (Jan): 111357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111357.
Seo, J., and I. Amatya. 2021b. Structural performance of dynamic message signs with adhesive and welded connections. Brookings, SD: South Dakota State Univ.
Seo, J., I. Amatya, T. Letcher, and E. Jeong. 2021. “Tensile and shear behavior for adhesive and welded thin-walled connections in dynamic message signs.” Compos. Struct. 159 (Feb): 107193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107193.
Sharma, R., and B. Glemmestad. 2013. “On generalized reduced gradient method with multi-start and self-optimizing control structure for gas lift allocation optimization.” J. Process Control 23 (8): 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.07.001.
Xu, M., and C. G. Soares. 2012. “Assessment of the ultimate strength of narrow stiffened panel test specimens.” Thin-Walled Struct. 55 (2): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.02.006.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148 • Issue 2 • February 2022
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 29, 2020
Accepted: Aug 6, 2021
Published online: Nov 16, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 16, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.