Technical Papers
Aug 27, 2021

Buffeting and Self-Excited Load Measurements to Evaluate Ice and Dry Galloping of Yawed Power Transmission Lines

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

Dry and ice galloping of power transmission lines (conductors) that occur at moderate to large wind speeds cause large-amplitude motion in these long-suspended cables. This phenomenon can cause catastrophic damages such as flashover, wire burning, tripping, transmission line tower collapse, accident, interphase short circuit, and structural or fatigue failure of transmission towers or conductors. Wind-induced cable vibration, which has been extensively studied, can be classified based on its sources, such as rain-wind-induced vibration (RWIV), vortex-induced vibration (VIV), wake galloping, and dry/ice galloping. This study primarily focuses on the predictions of time-domain response and onset of dry- and ice-conductor galloping by measuring the self-excited and buffeting load parameters of the bare conductors and conductors with ice formation in normal and yawed wind. In this regard, a series of static and dynamic wind tunnel experiments were performed to fundamentally study the conductor vibration in dry and ice conditions. Surface pressure distribution and aerodynamic forces were measured for stationary section models of nonyawed and yawed dry conductors in a smooth flow. Additionally, the dynamic response of dry and iced conductors using a one-degree-of-freedom system was recorded by employing a free vibration setup to extract self-excited load parameters. Buffeting load parameters were measured by generating a sinusoidal-oscillating wind upstream of dry and iced conductors for different yaw angles. The experiments resulted in the identification of the Strouhal number (St), aerodynamic load coefficients (CD and CL), buffeting indicial derivative functions, aerodynamic stiffness, and aerodynamic damping of a conductor for yaw angles (β) ranging from 0° to 45°. Dynamic tests led to the proposing of several empirical equations to determine the critical reduced velocity (RVcr) or critical wind speed for dry and ice galloping of conductors at a given Scruton number (Sch) and yaw angle. Finally, a procedure was proposed to calculate the least damping required to suppress the conductor galloping under dry or iced conditions up to the design wind speed. The wind load parameters identified in this study can be used to numerically simulate the dynamic load and response in the time domain of dry and iced conductors in turbulent wind.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank the US National Science Foundation (NSF) for financially supporting this project under Grant No. CMMI-1537917.

References

ACAR (Aluminum Conductor-Aluminum-Alloy Reinforced). 2021. “Aluminum conductor-aluminum-alloy reinforced catalog.” Accessed July 23, 2021. https://www.southwire.com.
ASCE. 2017. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bruno, L., and D. Fransos. 2008. “Evaluation of Reynolds number effects on flutter derivatives of a flat plate by means of a computational approach.” J. Fluids Struct. 24 (7): 1058–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.03.001.
Chabart, O., and J. L. Lilien. 1998. “Galloping of electrical lines in wind tunnel facilities.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 74 (Apr): 967–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00088-9.
Chadha, J., and W. Jaster. 1975. “Influence of turbulence on the galloping instability of iced conductors.” IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst. 94 (5): 1489–1499. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-PAS.1975.31991.
Chang, B., P. Sarkar, and B. Phares. 2010. “Time-domain model for predicting aerodynamic loads on a slender support structure for fatigue design.” J. Eng. Mech. 136 (6): 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000122.
Chowdhury, A. G., and P. P. Sarkar. 2003. “A new technique for identification of eighteen flutter derivatives using a three-degree-of-freedom section model.” Eng. Struct. 25 (14): 1763–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.07.002.
Cremer, J., C. Counasse, V. de Ville de Goyet, A. Lothaire, and A. Dumortier. 1995. “The stays, their dynamic behaviour, their equipments: Bridges at Ben-Ahin, Wandre and upon Alzette.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Cable Dynamics, 489–496. Liege, Belgium: Association of Electrical Engineers Graduating from the Montefiore Institute.
Den Hartog, J. P. 1932. “Transmission line vibration due to sleet.” Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. 51 (4): 1074–1076. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AIEE.1932.5056223.
Desai, Y. M., P. Yu, N. Popplewell, and A. H. Shah. 1995. “Finite element modelling of transmission line galloping.” Comput. Struct. 57 (3): 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)00630-L.
Foti, F., and L. Martinelli. 2018. “Finite element modeling of cable galloping vibrations. Part II: Application to an iced cable in 1:2 multiple internal resonance.” J. Vib. Control 24 (7): 1322–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546316660017.
Foti, F., L. Martinelli, and F. Perotti. 2017. “A finite element approach to model galloping vibrations of iced suspended cables.” Procedia Eng. 199 (Jan): 3127–3132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.562.
Gurung, C. B., H. Yamaguchi, and T. Yukino. 2002. “Identification of large amplitude wind-induced vibration of ice-accreted transmission lines based on field observed data.” Eng. Struct. 24 (2): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00089-X.
Hou, F., and P. P. Sarkar. 2018. “A time-domain method for predicting wind-induced buffeting response of tall buildings.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 182 (Nov): 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.013.
Jafari, M., and P. P. Sarkar. 2019. “Parameter identification of wind-induced buffeting loads and onset criteria for dry-cable galloping of yawed/inclined cables.” Eng. Struct. 180 (Feb): 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.049.
Jafari, M., and P. P. Sarkar. 2020a. “Wind-induced response characteristics of a yawed and inclined cable in ABL wind: Experimental-and numerical-model based study.” Eng. Struct. 214 (Jul): 110681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110681.
Jafari, M., and P. P. Sarkar. 2020b. “Wind tunnel study of wake-induced aerodynamics of parallel stay-cables and power conductor cables in a yawed flow.” Wind Struct. 30 (6): 617–631. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.30.6.617.
Jafari, M., P. P. Sarkar, and A. A. Alipour. 2019. “A numerical simulation method in time domain to study wind-induced excitation of traffic signal structures and its mitigation.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 193 (Oct): 103965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103965.
Jensen, A. G., and R. Höffer. 1998. “Flat plate flutter derivatives—An alternative formulation.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 74 (Apr): 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00078-6.
Katsuchi, H., and H. Yamada. 2009. “Wind-tunnel study on dry-galloping of indented-surface stay cable.” In Proc., 11th Americas Conf. on Wind Engineering, 22–26. San Juan, Puerto Rico: American Association of Wind Engineering, Polytechnic Institute of Puerto Rico.
Kim, J.-W., and J.-H. Sohn. 2018. “Galloping simulation of the power transmission line under the fluctuating wind.” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 19 (9): 1393–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0164-2.
Lee, J. 2011. Advanced electrical and electronics engineering. Berlin: Springer.
Le Maître, O. P., R. H. Scanlan, and O. M. Knio. 2003. “Estimation of the flutter derivatives of an NACA airfoil by means of Navier-Stokes simulation.” J. Fluids Struct. 17 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-9746(02)00111-1.
Lienhard, J. H. 1966. Synopsis of lift, drag, and vortex frequency data for rigid circular cylinders. Pullman, WA: Technical Extension Service, Washington State Univ.
Lou, W., D. Wu, H. Xu, and J. Yu. 2020. “Galloping stability criterion for 3-DOF coupled motion of an ice-accreted conductor.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (5): 04020071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002601.
Lu, J., Q. Wang, L. Wang, H. Mei, L. Yang, X. Xu, and L. Li. 2019. “Study on wind tunnel test and galloping of iced quad bundle conductor.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 160 (Apr): 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.12.009.
Matsumiya, H., T. Nishihara, and T. Yagi. 2018. “Aerodynamic modeling for large-amplitude galloping of four-bundled conductors.” J. Fluids Struct. 82 (Oct): 559–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.08.003.
Matsumoto, M. 2005. “Effects of axial flow and Karman vortex interference on dry-state galloping of inclined stay-cables.” In Proc., 6th Int. Symp. on Cable Dynamics. Stavanger, Norway: Univ. of Stavanger.
Matsumoto, M., T. Yagi, H. Hatsuda, T. Shima, M. Tanaka, and H. Naito. 2010. “Dry galloping characteristics and its mechanism of inclined/yawed cables.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98 (6–7): 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.12.001.
Meng, X., L. Wang, L. Hou, G. Fu, B. Sun, M. MacAlpine, W. Hu, and Y. Chen. 2011. “Dynamic characteristic of ice-shedding on UHV overhead transmission lines.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 66 (1): 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.01.005.
Mishra, S. S., K. Kumar, and P. Krishna. 2008. “Relevance of eighteen flutter derivatives in wind response of a long-span cable-stayed bridge.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (5): 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:5(769).
Nigol, O., and P. G. Buchan. 1981. “Conductor galloping—Part II torsional mechanism.” IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst. 100 (2): 708–720. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1981.316922.
Phelan, R. S., P. P. Sarkar, and K. C. Mehta. 2006. “Full-scale measurements to investigate rain–wind induced cable-stay vibration and its mitigation.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (3): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:3(293).
Richardson, A. S. 1981. “Dynamic analysis of lightly iced conductor galloping in two degrees of freedom.” IEE Proc. C-Gener. Transm. Distrib. 128 (4): 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-c.1981.0035.
Simiu, E., and R. H. Scanlan. 1986. Wind effects on structures. New York: Wiley.
Tao, T., Y.-L. Xu, Z. Huang, S. Zhan, and H. Wang. 2020. “Buffeting analysis of long-span bridges under typhoon winds with time-varying spectra and coherences.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (12): 04020255. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002835.
Taylor, Z., S. Stoyanoff, P.-O. Dallaire, D. Kelly, and P. Irwin. 2017. “Aerodynamics of long-span bridges: Susceptibility to snow and ice accretion.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (7): 04017039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001774.
Vo, D., H. Katsuchi, and H. Yamada. 2017. “Dry galloping of surface modification cable in low Scruton number range.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Flutter and its Application, 629–638. Tokyo: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency.
Wang, X., and W. J. Lou. 2009. “Numerical approach to galloping of conductor.” In Proc., 7th Asia-Pacific Conf. on Wind Engineering. Taipei, Taiwan: International Association for Wind Engineering.
Wang, X. J., Q. S. Li, and B. W. Yan. 2020. “Full-scale measurements of wind pressures on a low-rise building during typhoons and comparison with wind tunnel test results and aerodynamic database.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (10): 04020196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002769.
Wu, X., M. Jafari, P. Sarkar, and A. Sharma. 2020. “Verification of DES for flow over rigidly and elastically-mounted circular cylinders in normal and yawed flow.” J. Fluids Struct. 94 (Apr): 102895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.102895.
Wu, X., A. Sharma, M. Jafari, and P. Sarkar. 2017. “Towards predicting dry cable galloping using detached eddy simulations.” In Proc., 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1483. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Xinmin, L., Z. Kuanjun, and L. Bin. 2012. “Research of experimental simulation on aerodynamic character for typed iced conductor.” AASRI Procedia 2 (Jan): 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasri.2012.09.021.
Xu, F. Y. 2015. “System decoupling approach for 3-DOF bridge flutter analysis.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (7): 04014168. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001129.
Zdero, R., and O. F. Turan. 2010. “The effect of surface strands, angle of attack, and ice accretion on the flow field around electrical power cables.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98 (10–11): 672–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.04.005.
Zhang, J., L. Makkonen, and Q. He. 2017. “A 2D numerical study on the effect of conductor shape on icing collision efficiency.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 143 (Nov): 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.08.013.
Zhang, X., and J. M. W. Brownjohn. 2005. “Some considerations on the effects of the P-derivatives on bridge deck flutter.” J. Sound Vib. 283 (3–5): 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.05.031.
Zhou, A., X. Liu, S. Zhang, F. Cui, and P. Liu. 2018. “Wind tunnel test of the influence of an interphase spacer on the galloping control of iced eight-bundled conductors.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 155 (Nov): 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.08.026.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Jan 12, 2021
Accepted: Jun 15, 2021
Published online: Aug 27, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 27, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad Jafari, Ph.D. [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75080 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Partha P. Sarkar, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50014. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Bayesian Operational Modal Analysis with Interactive Optimization for Model Updating of Large-Size UHV Transmission Towers, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12503, 149, 12, (2023).
  • Static and Dynamic Response Characteristics of a Full-Scale Long-Cantilever Tower under Various Loading Conditions, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11788, 149, 5, (2023).
  • Bearing Capacity Analysis of Transmission Tower Structure Considering Corrosion Damage, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 10.1088/1742-6596/2148/1/012052, 2148, 1, (012052), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share