Technical Papers
Aug 27, 2021

Nonlinear Dynamic Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems Subjected to Along-Wind Loads. II: Implications for Structural Reliability

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

Part I of the two companion papers postulated and proved the capability of self-centering systems in controlling the wind-induced damage accumulations due to long-duration along-wind loads. The present Part II paper demonstrates the benefits of ductility-based wind design in terms of economics and safety through structural reliability analysis. Initially, for self-centering systems, the ductility demands are estimated for various levels of force reduction factors, structural damping, postyield stiffness ratio, natural frequency, and energy dissipation capacity. To reduce the computational cost of structural reliability analysis, empirical equations of the mean of peak ductility demands are derived in terms of the force reduction factor and natural frequency. In the reliability estimations, two limit states, the first significant yield and incipient collapse, are considered. Both analytical and simulation techniques are used to compute the failure probabilities by considering uncertainties in both the wind load effects and capacity. Overall, the results indicate that ductile self-centering systems could be designed for reduced along-wind loads and still achieve the minimum required safety level. The results also reveal that self-centering systems designed using the linear-elastic approach but additionally detailed for ductility have a significant reserve of safety against incipient collapse.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (such as simulated wind load time histories and nonlinear time history analysis results).

Acknowledgments

The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery awards and financial support by Mitacs in collaboration with FPInnovations supported this research. The help of Mrs. Karen Norman in finding the old papers of the late Professor Alan G. Davenport and other members of Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory (BLWTL) is greatly appreciated.

References

Barbato, M., F. Petrini, V. U. Unnikrishnan, and M. Ciampoli. 2013. “Performance-based hurricane engineering (PBHE) framework.” Struct. Saf. 45 (Nov): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.07.002.
Bashor, R., T. Kijewski-Correa, and A. Kareem. 2005. “On the wind-induced response of tall buildings: The effect of uncertainties in dynamic properties and human comfort thresholds.” In Proc., Americas Conf. on Wind Engineering. Ames, IA: American Association for Wind Engineering.
Bernardini, E., S. M. Spence, D. K. Kwon, and A. Kareem. 2015. “Performance-based design of high-rise buildings for occupant comfort.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (10): 04014244. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001223.
Bezabeh, M. A., G. T. Bitsuamlak, M. Popovski, and S. Tesfamariam. 2018. “Probabilistic serviceability-performance assessment of tall mass-timber buildings subjected to stochastic wind loads. Part II: Structural reliability analysis.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 181 (Oct): 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.08.013.
Bezabeh, M. A., S. Tesfamariam, M. Popovski, K. Goda, and S. F. Stiemer. 2017. “Seismic base shear modification factors for timber-steel hybrid structure: Collapse risk assessment approach.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (10): 04017136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001869.
Chen, D., and A. G. Davenport. 2000. “Vulnerability of tall buildings in typhoons.” Adv. Struct. Dyn. 2: 1455–1462.
Chopra, A. K. 2000. Dynamics of structures. Prentice Hall, Hoboken, NJ.
Chuang, W. C., and S. M. Spence. 2019. “An efficient framework for the inelastic performance assessment of structural systems subject to stochastic wind loads.” Eng. Struct. 179 (Jan): 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.039.
Ciampoli, M., F. Petrini, and G. Augusti. 2011. “Performance-based wind engineering: Towards a general procedure.” Struct. Saf. 33 (6): 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.07.001.
Cui, W., and L. Caracoglia. 2015. “Simulation and analysis of intervention costs due to wind-induced damage on tall buildings.” Eng. Struct. 87 (Mar): 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.001.
Dalgliesh, W. A., and J. H. Rainer. 1978. “Measurements of wind induced displacements and accelerations of a 57 storey building in Toronto, Canada.” In Proc., Colloquium on Industrial Aerodynamics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Davenport, A. G. 1983. “The relationship of reliability to wind loading.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 13 (1–3): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90125-3.
Diniz, S. M., and E. Simiu. 2005. “Probabilistic descriptions of wind effects and wind-load factors for database-assisted design.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (3): 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:3(507).
Ellingwood, B., T. V. Galambos, J. G. MacGregor, and C. A. Cornell. 1980. Vol. 13 of Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58: Building code requirements for minimum design loads in buildings and other structures. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
Ellingwood, B. R., and P. B. Tekie. 1999. “Wind load statistics for probability-based structural design.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (4): 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(453).
FEMA. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P695. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
Filiatrault, A., and B. Folz. 2002. “Performance-based seismic design of wood framed buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (1): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(39).
Freeman, S. A. 1990. “On the correlation of code forces to earthquake demands.” In Proc., 4th US-Japan Workshop on Improvement of Build Structural Design and Construction Practices. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
Gani, F., and F. Légeron. 2012. “Relationship between specified ductility and strength demand reduction for single degree-of-freedom systems under extreme wind events.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 109 (Oct): 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.06.006.
Goda, K., H. P. Hong, and C. S. Lee. 2009. “Probabilistic characteristics of seismic ductility demand of SDOF systems with Bouc-Wen hysteretic behavior.” J. Earthquake Eng. 13 (5): 600–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802645098.
Haviland, R. 1976. A study of the uncertainties in the fundamental translational periods and damping values for real buildings. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Constructed Facilities Division.
Hong, H. P. 2004. “Accumulation of wind induced damage on bilinear SDOF systems.” Wind Struct. 7 (3): 145–158. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2004.7.3.145.
Hong, H. P., and P. Hong. 2007. “Assessment of ductility demand and reliability of bilinear single-degree-of-freedom systems under earthquake loading.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 34 (12): 1606–1615. https://doi.org/10.1139/L07-077.
Ibarra, L. F. 2003. “Global collapses of frame structures under seismic excitations.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Ierimonti, L., I. Venanzi, L. Caracoglia, and A. L. Materazzi. 2019. “Cost-based design of non structural elements for tall buildings under extreme wind environments.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 32 (3): 04019020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001008.
Judd, J. P. 2018. “Windstorm resilience of a 10-story steel frame office building.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (3): 04018020. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000971.
Kareem, A., and W. J. Sun. 1990. “Dynamic response of structures with uncertain damping.” Eng. Struct. 12 (1): 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(90)90032-N.
Minciarelli, F., M. Gioffrè, M. Grigoriu, and E. Simiu. 2001. “Estimates of extreme wind effects and wind load factors: Influence of knowledge uncertainties.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 16 (4): 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00024-8.
Miranda, E., and V. V. Bertero. 1994. “Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design.” Earthquake Spectra 10 (2): 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778.
Montiel, M. A., and S. E. Ruiz. 2007. “Influence of structural capacity uncertainty on seismic reliability of buildings under narrow-band motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (13): 1915–1934. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.711.
Nakashima, M. 1994. “Variation of ductility capacity of steel beam-columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (7): 1941–1960. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:7(1941).
Nakashima, M. 1997. “Uncertainties associated with ductility performance of steel building structures.” In Seismic design methodology for the next generation of codes, edited by P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, 111–118. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Nassar, A. A., and H. Krawinkler. 1991. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ.
NBCC (National Building Code of Canada). 2005. User’s guide—NBCC 2005 structural commentaries (part 4). Canadian commission on buildings and fire codes. Ottawa: NRCC.
NBCC (National Building Code of Canada). 2015. User’s guide—NBCC 2015 structural commentaries (part 4). Canadian commission on buildings and fire codes. Ottawa: NRCC.
Newmark, N. M., and W. J. Hall. 1982. Earthquake spectra and design. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Pozos-Estrada, A., H. P. Hong, and J. K. Galsworthy. 2011. “Reliability of structures with tuned mass dampers under wind-induced motion: A serviceability consideration.” Wind Struct. 14 (2): 113–131. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2011.14.2.113.
Solari, G. 1997. “Wind-excited response of structures with uncertain parameters.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 12 (2): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(96)00027-6.
Spence, S. M., and A. Kareem. 2014. “Performance-based design and optimization of uncertain wind-excited dynamic building systems.” Eng. Struct. 78 (Nov): 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.026.
Spence, S. M. J., W. C. Chuang, P. Tabbuso, E. Bernardini, A. Kareem, L. Palizzolo, and A. Pirrotta. 2016. “Performance-based engineering of wind-excited structures: A general methodology.” In Proc., Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress 2016, 1269–1282. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Tabbuso, P., S. M. Spence, L. Palizzolo, A. Pirrotta, and A. Kareem. 2016. “An efficient framework for the elasto-plastic reliability assessment of uncertain wind excited systems.” Struct. Saf. 58 (Jan): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.09.001.
Tang, Q. 2016. “Estimation of wind hazard over Canada and reliability-based assignment of design wind load.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Western Univ.
Uang, C.-M. 1991. “Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions.” J. Struct. Eng. 117 (1): 19–28 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19).
van de Lindt, J. W., and T. N. Dao. 2009. “Performance-based wind engineering for wood-frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (2): 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(169).
Veletsos, A. S., and N. M. Newmark. 1960. Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions. Champaign, IL: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Illinois.
Warsido, W. P., and G. T. Bitsuamlak. 2015. “Synthesis of wind tunnel and climatological data for estimating design wind effects: A copula based approach.” Struct. Saf. 57 (Nov): 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.07.004.
Whittaker, A. S., C.-M. Uang, and V. V. Bertero. 1990. An experimental study of the behavior of dual steel systems. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: May 17, 2019
Accepted: May 3, 2021
Published online: Aug 27, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 27, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matiyas A. Bezabeh, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Formerly, Visiting Research Student, Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory, Western Univ., London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory, Western Univ., London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0031-3176. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-5250. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Performance-Based Wind Design of Tall Buildings Considering Corner Modification and Inelastic Behavior, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13100, 150, 7, (2024).
  • Performance-Based Design of Tall Timber Buildings Under Earthquake and Wind Multi-Hazard Loads: Past, Present, and Future, Frontiers in Built Environment, 10.3389/fbuil.2022.848698, 8, (2022).
  • Performance-Based Wind Engineering: Background and State of the Art, Frontiers in Built Environment, 10.3389/fbuil.2022.830207, 8, (2022).
  • Recent Advances in the Modeling of Wind Hazards and Performance Assessment of Wind-Excited Systems, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003258, 148, 2, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share