Technical Papers
Aug 4, 2021

Experimental Performance Assessment of Large-Scale Polyurethane-Enhanced Damage-Resistant Bridge Columns with Energy Dissipation Links. II: Quantitative Results

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

This paper, which is the second of two companion papers, presents the results of a large-scale testing program on a novel bridge column design, termed polyurethane (PU)-enhanced rocking column with energy dissipation (ED) links. The experimental program included cyclic testing of large-scale (approximately 12.5) cantilever bridge columns, including (1) a rocking-only precast concrete column, which served as the reference column, (2) a PU-enhanced rocking column with a solid PU segment, and (3) a PU-enhanced rocking column with an axisymmetrically bilayered segment with an exterior PU layer to withstand seismic loads, an internal reinforced concrete core to sustain long-term gravity loads, and external ED links to provide energy dissipation and flexural stiffness and strength. The specimens were subjected to displacement-controlled lateral cyclic loading of increasing amplitude (exceeding a 10% drift ratio) at several drift ratio rates (up to 1  s1). The tested PU column with ED links was further repaired via ED link release and retightening—the yielding of the ED links was small and did not justify replacement—to demonstrate its rapid reparability characteristics. The repaired column was subsequently retested to demonstrate that the original column properties had been practically recovered. This second companion paper experimentally quantifies the performance of all designs in terms of strength, ductility capacity, self-centering and energy dissipation capabilities, posttensioning losses, and ED link fracture capacity. It also quantifies the capability of ED link release and retightening (and, by extension, ED link replacement) in eliminating residual deformations and recovering the mechanical properties of the original/undamaged system. Compared to conventional RC rocking-only columns, the proposed PU-enhanced column design with ED links demonstrated higher energy dissipation and self-centering capabilities, while release and retightening of the ED links eliminated the residual deformations and resulted in the recovery of the mechanical properties of the original/undamaged column. While ED link release and retightening (i.e., ED link reuse) is adopted in this study, because the yielding of the ED links was small, as verified herein by the practically identical response of the original and repaired column, it can be deduced that ED link replacement (i.e., use of new/pristine ED links) would also restore the original column properties and eliminate residual deformations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge BASF (2016), particularly Mr. Patrick Webster and Mrs. Staci Wegener, for donating polyurethane solutions and samples and for providing guidance on segment casting.

References

Abdelkarim, O. I., M. A. ElGawady, A. Gheni, S. Anumolu, and M. Abdulazeez. 2016. “Seismic performance of innovative hollow-core FRP–concrete–steel bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (2): 04016120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000985.
Ameli, M., and C. P. Pantelides. 2017. “Seismic analysis of precast concrete bridge columns connected with grouted splice sleeve connectors.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (2): 04016176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001678.
Ameli, M., J. E. Parks, D. N. Brown, and C. P. Pantelides. 2015. “Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column-to-cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction.” PCI J. 60 (2): 80–103. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012015.80.103.
Ameli, M. J., D. N. Brown, J. E. Parks, and C. P. Pantelides. 2016. “Seismic column-to-footing connections using grouted splice sleeves.” ACI Struct. J. 113 (5): 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.14359/51688755.
Ameli, M. J., J. E. Parks, D. N. Brown, and C. P. Pantelides. 2014. “Grouted splice sleeve connection alternatives for precast reinforced concrete bridge piers in moderate-to-high seismic regions.” In Proc., 10th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
BASF. 2016. “Industrial chemical manufacturer.” Accessed February 15, 2014. https://www.basf.com/us/en.html.
Belleri, A., and P. Riva. 2012. “Seismic performance and retrofit of precast concrete grouted sleeve connections.” PCI J. 57 (1): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01012012.97.109.
Billington, S. L., R. W. Barnes, and J. E. Breen. 1999. “A precast segmental substruture system for standard bridges.” PCI J. 44 (4): 56–73.
Billington, S. L., and J. Yoon. 2004. “Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (4): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(353).
Chou, C. C., and Y. C. Chen. 2006. “Cyclic tests of post-tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (2): 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.512.
ElGawady, M. A., and H. M. Dawood. 2012. “Analysis of segmental piers consisted of concrete filled FRP tubes.” Eng. Struct. 38 (May): 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.001.
Figg, L., and W. D. Pate. 2004. “Precast concrete segmental bridges-America’s beautiful and affordable icons.” PCI J. 49 (5): 26–38.
Filiatrault, A., R. Tremblay, C. Christopoulos, B. Folz, and D. Pettinga. 2013. Elements of earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. 3rd ed. Montreal, Canada: Presses Internationales Polytechnique.
Freyermuth, C. L. 1999. “Ten years of segmental achievements and projections for the next century.” PCI J. 44 (3): 36–44.
Guerrini, G., J. Restrepo, and M. Schoettler. 2017. “Self-centering, low-damage, precast post-tensioned columns for accelerated bridge construction in seismic regions.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Guerrini, G., J. I. Restrepo, M. Massari, and A. Vervelidis. 2015. “Seismic behavior of posttensioned self-centering precast concrete dual-shell steel columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001054.
Haber, Z. B., M. S. Saiidi, and D. H. Sanders. 2014. “Seismic performance of precast columns with mechanically spliced column-footing connections.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (3): 639–650. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686624.
Haraldsson, O. S., T. M. Janes, M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2013. “Seismic resistance of socket connection between footing and precast column.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (9): 910–919. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000413.
Haraldsson, O. S., J. B. K. Pang, J. F. Stanton, and M. O. Eberhard. 2009. “A precast concrete bridge bent for seismic regions.” In Proc., Special International Workshop on Seismic Connection Details for Segmental Bridge Construction—Technical Report MCEER-09-0012. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Hewes, J. 2007. “Seismic tests on precast segmental concrete columns with unbonded tendons.” Bridge Struct. 3 (3–4): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732480701520352.
Hewes, J. T., and M. N. Priestley. 2002. Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns. La Jolla, CA: Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California, San Diego.
Hieber, D. G., J. M. Wacker, M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2005. Precast concrete systems for rapid construction of bridges. Seattle, WA: Washington State Transportation Center, Univ. of Washington.
Ichikawa, S., H. Matsuzaki, A. Moustafa, M. A. ElGawady, and K. Kawashima. 2016. “Seismic-resistant bridge columns with ultrahigh-performance concrete segments.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (9): 04016049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000898.
Jansson, P. O. 2008. Evaluation of grout-filled mechanical splices for precast concrete construction. Lansing, MI: Michigan Transportation Commission.
Khaleghi, B., E. Schultz, S. Seguirant, L. Marsh, O. Haraldsson, M. Eberhard, and J. Stanton. 2012. “Accelerated bridge construction in Washington State.” PCI J. 57 (4): 34–49.
Lehman, D. E., and C. W. Roeder. 2012. “Foundation connections for circular concrete-filled tubes.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 78 (Nov): 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.001.
Mander, J. B., and C.-T. Cheng. 1997. Seismic design of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design (NCEER-97-0014. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Marriott, D. 2009. The development of high-performance post-tensioned rocking systems for the seismic design of structures. Christchurch, New Zealand: Univ. of Canterbury.
Marriott, D., S. Pampanin, and A. Palermo. 2009. “Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (3): 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.857.
Matsumoto, E. E., M. E. Kreger, M. C. Waggoner, and G. Sumen. 2002. “Grouted connection tests in development of precast bent cap system.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1814 (1): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/1814-07.
Matsumoto, E. E., M. C. Waggoner, M. E. Kreger, J. Vogel, and L. Wolf. 2008. “Development of a precast concrete bent-cap system.” PCI J. 53 (3): 74–99. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05012008.74.99.
Morgen, B., and Y. Kurama. 2004. “A friction damper for post-tensioned precast concrete beam-to-column joints.” PCI J. 49 (4): 112–133. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07012004.112.133.
Motaref, S., M. S. Saiidi, and D. Sanders. 2013. “Shake table studies of energy-dissipating segmental bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (2): 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000518.
Moustafa, A., and M. A. ElGawady. 2017. Seismic behavior of a damage-resistant segmental bridge column with external energy dissipaters. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Moustafa, A., A. Gheni, and M. A. ElGawady. 2017. “Shaking-table testing of high energy—Dissipating rubberized concrete columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (8): 04017042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001077.
Nikoukalam, M. T., and P. Sideris. 2016. “Low-damage post-tensioned segmental bridge columns with flexible end joints for seismic accelerated bridge construction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2592 (1): 151–161. https://doi.org/10.3141/2592-17.
Nikoukalam, M. T., and P. Sideris. 2017. “Resilient bridge rocking columns with polyurethane damage-resistant end segments and replaceable energy-dissipating links.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (10): 04017064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001069.
Nikoukalam, M. T., and P. Sideris. 2021. “Experimental performance assessment of large-scale polyurethane-enhanced damage-resistant bridge columns with energy dissipation links. I: Overview and damage assessment.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (10): 04021155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003078.
Ou, Y. C., M. Chiewanichakorn, A. J. Aref, and G. C. Lee. 2007. “Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (11): 1636–1647. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1636).
Ou, Y. C., M. S. Tsai, K. C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2010. “Cyclic behavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with high performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39 (11): 1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.986.
Ou, Y. C., P.-H. Wang, M.-S. Tsai, K.-C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2009. “Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (3): 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000110.
Panagiotou, M., W. Trono, G. Jen, P. Kumar, and C. P. Ostertag. 2014. “Experimental seismic response of hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete bridge columns with novel longitudinal reinforcement detailing.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (7): 04014090. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000684.
Pang, J. B., M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2010. “Large-bar connection for precast bridge bents in seismic regions.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000081.
Pantelides, C. P., M. J. Ameli, J. E. Parks, and D. N. Brown. 2014. Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for precast RC bridge piers in ABC. Salt Lake City, UT: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah.
Restrepo, J. I., M. J. Tobolski, and E. E. Matsumoto. 2011. Development of a precast bent cap system for seismic regions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Roh, H., and A. M. Reinhorn. 2010. “Hysteretic behavior of precast segmental bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy bars.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3394–3403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.013.
Sideris, P., A. J. Aref, and A. Filiatrault. 2014. “Large-scale seismic testing of a hybrid sliding-rocking post-tensioned segmental bridge system.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (6): 04014025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000961.
Steuck, K. P., M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2009. “Anchorage of large-diameter reinforcing bars in Ducts.” ACI Struct. J. 106 (4): 506–513.
Tazarv, M., and M. S. Saiidi. 2013. “Emulative moment-resistant RC bridge column-footing connection for accelerated bridge construction in high seismic zone.” In Proc., 7th National Seismic Conf. on Bridges and Highways. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Trono, W., G. Jen, M. Panagiotou, M. Schoettler, and C. P. Ostertag. 2014. “Seismic response of a damage-resistant recentering posttensioned-HYFRC bridge column.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (7): 04014096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000692.
Varela, S., and M. S. Saiidi. 2019. “Experimental study on seismically resilient 2-span bridge models designed for disassembly.” J. Earthquake Eng. 23 (1): 72–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1309724.
Wang, J. C., Y. C. Ou, K. C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2008. “Large-scale seismic tests of tall concrete bridge columns with precast segmental construction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (12): 1449–1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.824.
Weinert, M. D. 2011. “Substructure Connections for accelerated bridge construction in seismic regions.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
White, C., and R. Castrodale. 2004. Extending span ranges of precast prestressed concrete girders. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
White, S. L. 2014. Controlled damage rocking systems for accelerated bridge construction. Masters thesis, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resource Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury.
Yamashita, R., and D. H. Sanders. 2009. “Seismic performance of precast unbonded prestressed concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J. 106 (6): 821–830.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Feb 20, 2020
Accepted: Mar 22, 2021
Published online: Aug 4, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 4, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad T. Nikoukalam [email protected]
Project Consultant, Simpsons Gumpertz & Heger, 480 Totten Pond Rd., Waltham, MA 02451; formerly, Graduate Research Assistant and Ph.D. Candidate, Zachry Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1183-7397. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Development of Aseismic Column with Self-Centering Capacity Only during Restoration, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12949, 150, 10, (2024).
  • State-of-the-art review of the seismic performance of precast segmental columns, Advances in Bridge Engineering, 10.1186/s43251-022-00058-x, 3, 1, (2022).
  • Hysteretic behavior degeneration mechanism and damage evaluation of self-centering bridge pier system, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114895, 270, (114895), (2022).
  • Experimental Performance Assessment of Large-Scale Polyurethane-Enhanced Damage-Resistant Bridge Columns with Energy Dissipation Links. I: Overview and Damage Assessment, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003078, 147, 10, (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share