Technical Papers
Apr 19, 2021

Probabilistic-Based Approach for Evaluating the Thermal Response of Concrete Slabs under Fire Loading

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 7

Abstract

Performance-based design for fire safety has been introduced in several international design frameworks. The fire models and simulations include various assumptions and simplifications, and the current fire resistance evaluation is based on deterministic approaches, leading to uncertainties in the performance of the structural members exposed to fire. An alternative is the application of probabilistic methodologies to assess the fire resistance of the structural members. The authors present the application of an efficient probabilistic methodology to perform a sensitivity analysis to identify the critical variables of a thermal model of a structural element exposed to characteristic fire loading. Furthermore, the methodology determines the reliability of the structural element. The methodology combines the elementary effects method with variance-based methods to rank the influence of the governing variables of the thermal and fire models on the thermal performance of a reinforced concrete slab and to determine their uncertainty contribution to the time-dependent thermal response. Furthermore, the Monte Carlo method is applied to calculate the probability of failure and the reliability index of the structural member exposed to fire loading. The critical governing variables from the fire model are the firefighting measures index, which accounts for firefighting measures used in the compartment (FFMi), characteristic fuel load density (qf,k), compartment opening factor (O), and the ratio of the compartment’s floor area to total area (Af/At). The critical governing variables from the thermal model are the coefficient of convection (h), concrete specific heat (cc), concrete density (dc), and concrete conductivity (kc). As one moves away from the exposed surface, h, qf,k, and Af/At are not as influential in the thermal response. Also observed is that the uncertainty of FFMi, O, cc, and h are the primary sources of the thermal response’s uncertainty. Considering the variability of the input variables, a low-reliability index is determined for buildings with no basic firefighting measures, and adding intervention measures, sprinkler systems, and detection systems will increase the reliability index by 53%, 85%, and 89%, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all of the data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Collected data points for the thermal properties of the concrete;
MATLAB code files for the algorithms used for the probabilistic analysis; and
ANSYS files for the thermal analysis of the RC slab.

References

ASTM. 2002. Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials. ASTM E119. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Campolongo, F., A. Saltelli, and J. Cariboni. 2011. “From screening to quantitative sensitivity analysis: A unified approach.” Data Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (4): 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.039.
Castillo, E., R. Minguez, and C. Castillo. 2008. “Sensitivity analysis in optimization and reliability problems.” Reliability Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (12): 1788–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.010.
CEN (European Committee for Standarization). 2002. Eurocode1: Actions on structures, part1—2: General actions on structures exposed to fire. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standarization). 2004. Eurocode2: Design of concrete structures, part 1–2: General rules—Structural fire design. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standarization). 2005. Eurocode3: Design of steel structures, part 1–2: General rules—Structural fire design. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Cooke, G. M. E. 2001. “Behaviour of precast concrete slabs exposed to standardized fires.” Fire Saf. J. 36 (5): 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-7112(01)00005-4.
Der Kiureghian, A., and O. Dirlevsen. 2009. “Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?” Struct. Saf. 31 (2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020.
Gernay, T., N. E. Khorasani, and M. Garlock. 2016. “Fire fragility curves for steel buildings in a community context: A methodology.” Eng. Struct. 113 (Apr): 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.043.
Guo, Q., and A. E. Jeffers. 2014. “Finite-element reliability analysis of structures subjected to fire.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001082.
Hawileh, R., and V. K. R. Kodur. 2018. “Performance of reinforced concrete slabs under hydrocarbon fire exposure.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 77 (Jul): 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.024.
Hawileh, R., and M. Naser. 2012. “Thermal-stress analysis of RC beams reinforced with GFRP bars.” Composites, Part B 43 (5): 2135–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.004.
Hawileh, R., M. Naser, and H. Rasheed. 2011. “Thermal-stress finite element analysis of CFRP strengthened concrete beam exposed to top surface fire.” Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 18 (3): 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2010.499019.
Hawileh, R., M. Naser, W. Zaidan, and H. Rasheed. 2009. “Modeling of insulated CFRP strengthened reinforced concrete T-beam exposed to fire.” Eng. Struct. 31 (12): 3072–3079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.008.
Hawileh, R., and H. Rasheed. 2017. “Thermal analysis of GFRP-reinforced continuous concrete decks subjected to top fire.” Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 9 (4): 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-017-0168-7.
Heidari, M., F. Robert, and D. Lange. 2019. “Probabilistic study of the resistance of a simply-supported reinforced concrete slab according to Eurocode parametric fire.” Fire Technol. 55 (4): 1377–1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0704-4.
Hopkin, D., R. Van Coile, and I. Fu. 2018. “Developing fragility curves and estimating failure probabilities for protected steel structural elements subject to fully developed fires.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Structures in Fire, Belfast. Belfast, UK: Ulster Univ.
Hurley, M. J., and E. R. Rosenbaum. 2015. Performance-based fire safety design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press and SPFE.
Hurley, M. J., and E. R. Rosenbaum. 2016. “Performance-based design.” In SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, edited by M. J. Hurley, D. T. Gottuk, J. R. Hall Jr., K. Harada, E. D. Kuligowski, M. Puchovsky, J. L. Torero, and J. M. Watts Jr., and C. J. Wieczorek, 5th ed. 1233–1261. New York: Springer.
Iqbal, S., and R. S. Harichandran. 2010. “Capacity reduction and fire load factors for design of steel members exposed to fire.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (12): 1554–1562. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000256.
ISO. 1975. Fire resistance tests—Elements of building construction. ISO 834. Geneva: ISO.
Jowsey, A. 2006. “Fire imposed heat fluxes for structural analysis.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Engineering, Univ. of Edinburgh.
Karaki, G. 2011. “Assessment of coupled models of bridges considering time-dependent vehicular loading.” Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar.
Karaki, G. 2013. “Reliability-based robust optimization using variance-based methods.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation: Research Applications in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, 2101–2105. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Keitel, H., G. Karaki, T. Lahmer, S. Nikulla, and V. Zabel. 2011. “Evaluation of coupled partial models in structural engineering using graph theory and sensitivity analysis.” Eng. Struct. 33 (12): 3726–3736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.009.
Khorasani, N. E., P. Gardoni, and M. Garlock. 2015. “Probabilistic fire analysis: Material models and evaluation of steel structural members.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (12): 04015050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001285.
Kodur, V. 2014. “Properties of concrete at elevated temperatures.” Int. Scholary Res. Not. 2014: 468510. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/468510.
Kodur, V., M. Dwaikat, and R. Fike. 2010. “High-temperature properties of steel for fire resistance modeling of structures.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 22 (5): 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000041.
Kodur, V., and W. Khaliq. 2011. “Effect of temperature on thermal properties of different types of high-strength concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23 (6): 793–801. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000225.
Lange, D., S. Devaney, and A. Usmani. 2014. “An application of the peer performance-based earthquake engineering framework to structures in fire.” Eng. Struct. 66 (May): 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.052.
Naser, M., R. Hawileh, and H. Rasheed. 2014. “Performance of RC T-beams externally strengthened with CFRP laminates under elevated temperatures.” J. Struct. Fire Eng. 5 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1260/2040-2317.5.1.1.
Naser, M., R. Hawileh, and H. Rasheed. 2015. “Modeling fire response of RC beams strengthened with CFRP laminates.” Spec. Publ. 301: 1–18.
Nowak, A. S., and K. R. Collins. 2000. Reliability of structures. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Olsson, K., J. Anderson, and D. Lange. 2017. “Uncertainty propagation in FE modelling of a fire resistance test using fractional factorial design-based model reduction and deterministic sampling.” Fire Saf. J. 91 (Jul): 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.032.
Qureshi, R., S. Ni, N. E. Khorasani, R. Van Coile, D. Hopkin, and T. Gernay. 2020. “Probabilistic models for temperature-dependent strength of steel and concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (6): 04020102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002621.
Ribeiro, F. L., R. P. Rosário, A. R. Barbosa, and L. C. Neves. 2016. “Sensitivity analysis of steel moment frames subjected to structural fire using the OpenSees framework.” In Proc., 10th National Conf. on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. Anchorage, AK: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Rini, D., and S. Lamont. 2008. “Performance based structural fire engineering for modern building design.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2008: Crossing Borders, 1–12. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Saltelli, A., K. Aleksankia, W. Becker, P. Fennel, F. Ferretti, N. Holst, S. Li, and Q. Wu. 2019. “Why so many published sensitivity analysis are false: A systematic review of sensitivity analysis practices.” Environ. Modell. Software 114 (Apr): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.01.012.
Saltelli, A., M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola. 2008. Global sensitivity analysis: The primer. New York: Wiley.
Sanchez, D. G., B. Lacarrière, M. Musy, and B. Bourges. 2012. “Application of sensitivity analysis in building energy simulations: Combining first- and second-order elementary effects methods.” Energy Build. 68 (Part C): 741–750.
Shin, K. Y., S. B. Kim, J. H. Kim, M. Chung, and P. S. Jung. 2002. “Thermo-physical properties and transient heat transfer of concrete at elevated temperatures.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 212 (1–3): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00487-3.
Sobol, I. M. 2001. “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates.” Math. Comput. Simul 55 (1–3): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6.
Spagnol, A., R. Le Riche, and S. Da Veiga. 2019. “Global sensitivity analysis for optimization with variable selection.” SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif. 7 (2): 417–443. https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1167978.
Stern-Gottfried, J., and G. Rein. 2012. “Travelling fires for structural design—Part II: Design methodology.” Fire Saf. J. 54 (Nov): 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.06.011.
Van Coile, R., E. Annerel, R. Caspeele, and L. Taerwe. 2011. “Probabilistic analysis of concrete beams during fire.” In Proc., Applications of Structural Fire Engineering (ASFE 2011), 127–132. Prague, Czech Republic: European Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research. http://fire.fsv.cvut.cz/ASFE11/Proceedings/ASFE_proceedings.pdf.
Van Coile, R., D. Hopkin, D. Lange, G. Jomaas, and L. Bisby. 2019. “The need for hierarchies of acceptance criteria for probabilistic risk assessments in fire engineering.” Fire Technol. 55 (4): 1111–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0746-7.
Withiam, J. L., E. P. Voytko, R. M. Barker, J. M. Duncan, B. C. Kelly, S. C. Musser, and V. Elias. 1998. Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for highway bridge substructures. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 7July 2021

History

Received: Sep 22, 2020
Accepted: Feb 8, 2021
Published online: Apr 19, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 19, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Birzeit Univ., P.O. Box 14, Birzeit, Palestine (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1139-707X. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, American Univ. of Sharjah, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0184-6732. Email: [email protected]
University Distinguished Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2058-2725. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share