Reducing Processing Time of Nonlinear Analysis of Symmetric-Plan Buildings
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 6
Abstract
Nonlinear response history analysis has been a powerful tool in performance-based earthquake engineering for validating the proposed design of new structures or evaluating existing ones. When it is applied to structural systems with a large number of degrees of freedom, such as three-dimensional (3D) models of tall buildings, bridges, or dams, the analyses can be time-consuming. The prolonged computing times become more prominent in parametric studies or in incremental dynamic analyses. In order to reduce the computation time, this study proposes a practical method—a reducing time steps (RTS) procedure—whereby leading and trailing weak signals in the input acceleration record are trimmed, and the remaining record is downsampled. The test results based on several different 3D computer models of reinforced-concrete idealized structures demonstrate that the RTS method is practical, and it provides estimates of engineering demand parameters such as peak values of story drift, floor acceleration, and floor velocity within 10% of the results obtained by using the original records. The RTS procedure was further validated on three symmetric-plan steel buildings with 5, 9, and 15 stories. For all analyzed cases, the average reduction in computational time was around 50%.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
For practical applications, the RTS procedure is available as a MatLAB function, which requires a moderate amount of data to characterize the structure. Ground-motion records are available at http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/. The design spectrum in Fig. 1 was defined using the US Seismic Design Maps tool, available at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php?
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Neal Simon Kwong and Eric Thompson for their reviews and constructive comments, which helped improve the technical quality and presentation of this article.
References
Akiyama, H. 1985. Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Arias, A. 1970. “A measure of earthquake intensity.” In Seismic design for nuclear power plants, edited by R. J. Hansen, 438–483. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-13. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 2005. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Washington, DC: ATC.
Avila, W. 2018. “Reducing of processing time of nonlinear response history analysis of complex structures.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes.
Chopra, A. K. 2007. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chopra, A. K. 2017. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chopra, A. K., and R. K. Goel. 2004. “A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33 (8): 903–927. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.380.
Fajfar, P. 2000. “A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design.” Earthquake Spectra 16 (3): 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128.
Hancock, J., J. Watson-Lamprey, N. Abrahamson, J. Bommer, A. Markatis, E. McCoy, and R. Mendis. 2006. “An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets.” J. Earthquake Eng. 10 (1): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460609350629.
ICC (International Code Council). 2015. International building code. Whittier, CA: ICC.
ICC (International Code Council). 2016. California building code. Whittier, CA: ICC.
Malhotra, P. K. 2002. “Cyclic-demand spectrum.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (7): 1441–1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.171.
Medina, R. A. 2002. “Seismic demands for nondeteriorating frame structures and their dependence on ground motions.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Reyes, J. C. 2009. “Estimating seismic demands for performance-based engineering of buildings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Reyes, J. C., and A. K. Chopra. 2011a. “Evaluation of three-dimensional modal pushover analysis for unsymmetric-plan buildings subjected to two components of ground motion.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (13): 1475–1494. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1100.
Reyes, J. C., and A. K. Chopra. 2011b. “Three-dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (7): 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1060.
Reyes, J. C., and E. Kalkan. 2011. Required number of ground motion records for ASCE/SEI 7 ground motion scaling procedure.. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1083/.
Reyes, J. C., and E. Kalkan. 2012. “How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI-7 ground-motion scaling procedure?” Earthquake Spectra 28 (3): 1223–1242. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000066.
Reyes, J. C., A. C. Riaño, and E. Kalkan. 2015. “Extending modal pushover-based scaling procedure for nonlinear response history analysis of multi-story unsymmetric-plan buildings.” Eng. Struct. 88 (Mar): 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.041.
Reyes, J. C., A. C. Riaño, E. Kalkan, O. A. Quintero, and C. M. Arango. 2014. “Assessment of spectrum matching procedure for nonlinear analysis of symmetric- and asymmetric-plan buildings.” Eng. Struct. 72 (Aug): 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.035.
Todorovska, M. I., H. Meidani, and M. D. Trifunac. 2009. “Wavelet approximation of earthquake strong motion-goodness of fit for a database in terms of predicting nonlinear structural response.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 29 (4): 742–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.08.001.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2004. “Applied incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 20 (2): 523–553. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1737737.
Zhong, P., and F. Zareian. 2014. “Method of speeding up buildings time history analysis by using appropriate downsampled integration time step.” In Proc., 10th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147 • Issue 6 • June 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 6, 2019
Accepted: Jan 6, 2021
Published online: Apr 9, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 9, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.