Technical Papers
Sep 29, 2020

Shaking Table Test on 1/2-Scale Model of Column-and-Tie Timber Structure Filled with Wooden Walls

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 12

Abstract

To study the influence of wooden walls on the seismic performance of traditional Chinese column-and-tie timber structures, two 1/2-scale two-story and two-span timber structure models were fabricated. The infill wall was not installed in model 1, while model 2 deployed wooden walls for comparison. The damage characteristics, seismic responses, and energy dissipation behaviors of the two models under the seismic ground motions of varying intensity were obtained through shaking table tests. The comparative analyses of the seismic performance of the two models indicated that the pull-out length of the tenon and the slippage degree of the column foot of model 1 were greater than those of model 2 with the same input. Moreover, the first natural frequency of model 2 was greater than that of model 1 due to the existence of the wooden walls, and the stiffness degradation rate of model 2 was lower than that of model 1. The first damping ratio of model 1 was between 10.2% and 15.0%, and that of model 2 was between 9.3% and 21.9%. The acceleration amplification factors of the two models were basically less than 1, which was significantly different from regular reinforced concrete structures or steel structures. When the input peak ground acceleration reached 0.22g (the maximum considered earthquake for the region with intensity seven), the maximum story drifts of the two models were 1/47 and 1/59, respectively, which met the story drift limit of 1/30 for timber frames in the Chinese Seismic Code for Timber Structures. The lateral stiffness of model 2 increased because of the existence of the wooden walls when compared with model 1. The energy dissipation of model 2 was greater than that of model 1 under the same earthquake excitation in terms of the deformation of the wooden walls and squeezing interaction between the timber frame and wooden walls.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program in the 13th Five-Year of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0703505), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51678478 and 51978568), Science and Technology Innovation Program of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2019TD-029), and Key Program of Basic Research on Natural Science of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2020JZ-50).

References

Benavent-Climent, A., D. Escolano-Margarit, and L. Morillas. 2014. “Shake-table tests of a reinforced concrete frame designed following modern codes: Seismic performance and damage evaluation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (6): 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2372.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2008. Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures. Part 1-1: General-Common rules and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
China Architecture and Building Press. 2016. Code for seismic design of buildings (2016 edition). Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
China Architecture and Building Press. 2020. Technical standard for maintenance and strengthening of historic timber building. GB/T 50165-2020. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
D’Ayala, D. F., and P. H. Tsai. 2008. “Seismic vulnerability of historic Dieh–Dou timber structures in Taiwan.” Eng. Struct. 30 (8): 2101–2113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.11.007.
Filiatrault, A., I. P. Christovasilis, A. Wanitkorkul, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2010. “Experimental seismic response of a full-scale light-frame wood building.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (10): 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000112.
Fujita, K., K. Chiba, N. Kawai, M. Koshihara, and C. Minowa. 2008. “Earthquake response analysis of traditional Japanese timber pagoda.” In Proc., 10th World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Miyazaki, Japan: World Conference on Timber Engineering.
Gao, Y. L., Z. Tao, L. Y. Ye, and M. Yang. 2016. “Shaking table tests of mortise-tenon joints of a traditional Chuan-Dou wood structure attached with viscoelastic dampers.” China Civ. Eng. J. 49 (2): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2016.02.007.
Hsu, M. F., S. Y. Yeo, P. Y. Shang, and W. S. Chang. 2009. “Full-scale experiment on Taiwanese traditional timber frame.” In Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies. Bath, UK: Univ. of Bath.
Jeary, A. P. 1997. “Damping in structures.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 72 (Nov): 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00263-8.
Ji, X. D., G. L. Fenves, K. Kajiwara, and M. Nakashima. 2011. “Seismic damage detection of a full-scale shaking table test structure.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (1): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000278.
Lu, X. T. 2015. “Shaking table test research about the influence of masonry-infilled wall on the seismic performance of the RC frame structures.” Master’s thesis, Harbin, China: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration.
Pan, W., J. Y. Xue, Y. Bai, and Z. Tao. 2017. Seismic behavior and reinforcement design method of civil structure residential buildings. Beijing: Science Press.
Qu, Z., A. Dutu, J. R. Zhong, and J. J. Sun. 2015. “Seismic damage to masonry-infilled timber houses in the 2013 M7.0 Lushan, China, earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (3): 1859–1874. https://doi.org/10.1193/012914EQS023T.
Sui, Y., H. T. Zhao, J. Y. Xue, and X. C. Zhang. 2010. “A study on Chinese ancient timber structures by shaking table test.” J. Build. Struct. 31 (2): 35–40. https://doi.org/10.14006/jzjgxb.2010.02.015.
Sun, B. T., H. Y. Zhang, and P. L. Yan. 2014. “Earthquake damage and feature analysis of Chinese traditional timber frame structures subjected to the Lushan 7.0 earthquake.” China Civ. Eng. J. 47 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.201403.015.
Tsai, P. H., and D. F. D’Ayala. 2011. “Performance-based seismic assessment method for Taiwanese historic Dieh-Dou timber structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (7): 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1050.
Tsuwa, I., and M. Koshihara. 2012. A study on the effect of wall stiffness on the vibration characteristics of traditional timber frames including Kumimono, 169–180. Tokyo: Univ. of Tokyo, Bulletin of ERS.
Wang, G. Y. 1978. Vibration of building structures. Beijing: Science Press.
Wang, H. D., A. Scanlon, S. P. Shang, and F. L. He. 2013. “Comparison of seismic experiments on traditional Chinese wood structures and light wood-framed structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (11): 2038–2043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000766.
Wang, T. 1992. A preliminary study on the static analysis of ancient timber structures. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press.
Xie, Q. F., L. Wang, L. P. Zhang, and W. B. Hu. 2019. “Seismic behavior of a traditional timber structure: Shaking table tests, energy dissipation mechanism and damage assessment model.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (3): 1689–1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0496-4.
Xie, Q. F., J. Y. Xue, and H. T. Zhao. 2010. “Seismic damage investigation and analysis of ancient building in Wenchuan earthquake.” J. Build. Struct. 31 (2): 18–23. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb2010.s2.049.
Xiong, H. B., J. Wang, L. Wu, and L. Chen. 2018. “Experimental study on lateral resistance performance of Chuandou wooden frame structures.” J. Build. Struct. 39 (10): 122–129. https://doi.org/10.14006/jjzjgxb.2018.10.014.
Xu, L. H., X. Shan, Y. Lv, and Z. X. Li. 2013. “Shaking table tests and damage analysis of a steel frame—Shear wall model structure.” J. Tianjin Univ. (Sci. Technol.) 46 (12): 1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.11784/tdxb20131212.
Xue, J. Y., Z. J. Wu, F. L. Zhang, and H. T. Zhao. 2015. “Seismic damage evaluation model of Chinese ancient timber buildings.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 18 (10): 1671–1683. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.18.101671.
Yao, K., and H. T. Zhao. 2006. “Study on the mechanism of sliding friction shock isolation between timber column and plinth in historical buildings.” Eng. Mech. 23 (8):127–131. https://doi.org/10.00-4750(2006)08-0127-05.
Yao, K., H. T. Zhao, and H. P. Ge. 2006. “Experimental studies on the characteristic of mortise-tenon joint in historical buildings.” Eng. Mech. 23 (10): 168–173. https://doi.org/10.00-4750(2006)10-0168-06.
Yeo, S. Y., K. Komatsu, M. F. Hsu, and Y. L. Chung. 2018. “Structural behavior of traditional Dieh-Dou timber main frame.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage. 12 (4): 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.20181442518.
Yu, Z. X., S. C. Zhao, and H. Wu. 2010. “Numerical simulation of aseismatic behavior of retrofitted masonry-timber structure of Jushi building on Qingcheng mountain.” J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 45 (2): 179–184. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn0258-2724.2010.02.003.
Yuan, J. L. 2018. “Seismic analysis method considering wall participation for ancient timber frame buildings.” J. Build. Struct. 39 (9): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.09.006.
Zhang, P. C., H. T. Zhao, J. Y. Xue, and D. F. Gao. 2002. “Shaking table test on building models of Chinese ancient timber structure.” World Earthquake Eng. 18 (4): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-6069.2002.04.007.
Zhang, X. C., J. Y. Xue, H. T. Zhao, and Y. Sui. 2011. “Experimental study on Chinese ancient timber-frame building by shaking table test.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 40 (4): 453–469. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem2011.40.4.453.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 12December 2020

History

Received: Jun 26, 2019
Accepted: Jun 16, 2020
Published online: Sep 29, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jianyang Xue [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-2360. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China; JSPS Postdoctoral Fellow, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto Univ., Uji, Kyoto 6110011, Japan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-2838. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Xi’an Univ. of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share