Experimental Investigation of a Concentrically Braced Frame with Replaceable Brace Modules
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 11
Abstract
When designing and building special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs), the common practice is to join the brace to the frame members using a gusset plate that is sized such that the brace buckles in the out-of-plane direction. This detailing requires time-consuming field welding, and out-of-plane brace buckling can damage the surrounding partitions and cladding. Moreover, the gusset plate will experience damage when the brace buckles, requiring the plate to be cut out and replaced after the earthquake. To improve this, an alternative connection was recently proposed in which all damage is intended to be confined to a replaceable brace module (RBM) so as to minimize the time of postearthquake repairs. Moreover, to improve constructability and repairability, shop-welded and field-bolted connections are used and detailed such that the brace will buckle in the in-plane direction. Previous testing validated this concept only for individual RBMs. To assess the interaction of all the braced frame components, this paper presents the results of an experimental study of 70%-scale one-story one-bay concentrically braced frame systems with RBMs. Three specimens were tested to examine the response with three different beam–column connection details. For each specimen, a sequence of tests was performed, the first with initial RBMs and the second with replaced RBMs. All tested systems sustained multiple inelastic cycles with an interstory drift range of 3.6%–4.0% prior to brace fracture. The RBMs were replaced easily and provided essentially the same level of performance as the original RBMs. Postfracture strength of as much as the nominal design shear resistance was also observed due to frame action, even without gusset plates at the beam–column intersections.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the work of the summer research interns Berg Ellemers and Anirban Kundu (Mitacs Globalink Research Intern) and the help of the technical staff (Kent Wheeler and Paul Hereema) at the Applied Dynamics Laboratory. Funding for this project has been provided by the Canadian Institute of Steel Construction (CISC) and the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC). The wide flange sections were donated by Salit Steel, and the HSS sections were donated by Atlas Tube. Fabrication services were provided by Walters Inc. Their support is gratefully acknowledged.
References
AISC. 2016a. Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2016b. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago: AISC.
ASCE. 2017. Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Astaneh, A., S. Goel, and R. Hanson. 1985. “Cyclic out-of-plane buckling of double-angle bracing.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (5): 1135–1153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:5(1135).
ASTM. 2015. Standard specification for structural steel shapes. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1992. Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Berman, J. W., and M. Bruneau. 2009. “Cyclic testing of a buckling restrained braced frame with unconstrained gusset connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (12): 1499–1510. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000078.
Computers and Structures. 2016. Structural analysis program, SAP-2000NL Version 16.0.0: Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures. Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2013. General requirements for rolled or welded structural quality steel/structural quality steel. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2014. Limit states design of steel structures. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
de Oliveira, C., J. A. Packer, and C. Christopoulos. 2008. “Cast steel connectors for circular hollow section braces under inelastic cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (3): 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:3(374).
Eatherton, M. R., and J. F. Hajjar. 2010. Large-scale cyclic and hybrid simulation testing and development of a controlled rocking steel building system with replaceable fuses. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Han, S. W., W. T. Kim, and D. A. Foutch. 2007. “Seismic behavior of HSS bracing members according to width-thickness ratio under symmetric cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (2): 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:2(264).
Kotulka, B. A. 2007. “Analysis for a design guide on gusset plates used in special concentrically braced frames.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
Lehman, D. E., C. W. Roeder, D. Herman, S. Johnson, and B. Kotulka. 2008. “Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (6): 890–901. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:6(890).
Lumpkin, E. J. 2009. “Enhanced seismic performance of multi-storey special concentrically brace frames using a balanced design procedure.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
Lumpkin, E. J., P. C. Hsiao, C. W. Roeder, D. E. Lehman, C. Y. Tsai, A. C. Wu, C. Y. Wei, and K. C. Tsai. 2012. “Investigation of the seismic response of three-story special concentrically braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 77 (Oct): 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.04.003.
Mohsenzadeh, V. 2020. “System-level seismic performance of concentrically braced frames with replaceable brace modules.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ.
Mohsenzadeh, V., and L. Wiebe. 2018. “Effect of beam-column connection fixity and gravity framing on the seismic collapse risk of special concentrically braced frames.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Dec): 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.035.
Mohsenzadeh, V., and L. Wiebe. Forthcoming. “Seismic design of braced frame columns with and without replaceable brace modules.” J. Constr. Steel Res.
NRC (National Research Council). 2015. National building code of Canada 2015. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada.
Roeder, C. W., D. E. Lehman, K. Clark, J. Powell, J. H. Yoo, K. C. Tsai, C. H. Lin, and C. Y. Wei. 2011a. “Influence of gusset plate connections and braces on the seismic performance of X-braced frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (4): 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1024.
Roeder, C. W., E. J. Lumpkin, and D. E. Lehman. 2011b. “A balanced design procedure for special concentrically braced frame connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 67 (11): 1760–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.04.016.
Roeder, C. W., A. D. Sen, C. Terpstra, S. M. Ibarra, R. Liu, D. E. Lehman, and J. W. Berman. 2019. “Effect of beam yielding on chevron braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 159 (Aug): 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.04.044.
Shi, Y., G. Shi, and Y. Wang. 2007. “Experimental and theoretical analysis of the moment–rotation behaviour of stiffened extended end-plate connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 63 (9): 1279–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.11.008.
Stevens, D., and L. Wiebe. 2019. “Experimental testing of a replaceable brace module for seismically designed concentrically braced steel frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (4): 04019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002283.
Takeuchi, T., and R. Matsui. 2015. “Cumulative deformation capacity of braces under various cyclic loading histories.” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 77 (677): 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.77.1131.
Tremblay, R., P. Timler, M. Bruneau, and A. Filiatrault. 1995. “Performance of steel structures during the 1994 Northridge earthquake.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 22 (2): 338–360. https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-046.
Tsai, C. Y., et al. 2013. “Seismic design and hybrid tests of a full-scale three-storey concentrically braced frame using in-plane buckling braces.” Earthquake Spectra 29 (3): 1043–1067. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000165.
Tsai, C. Y., K. C. Tsai, C. H. Lin, C. Y. Wei, K. J. Wang, Y. J. Yu, and A. C. Wu. 2010. “Cyclic responses of three 2-storey seismic concentrically braced frames.” Front. Arch. Civ. Eng. China 4 (3): 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0087-1.
Uriz, P., and S. A. Mahin. 2008. Toward earthquake-resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 5, 2019
Accepted: Jun 4, 2020
Published online: Aug 24, 2020
Published in print: Nov 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jan 24, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.