Influence of Steel Reinforcement on the Performance of Elastomeric Bearings
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 10
Abstract
Seismic isolation is an effective measure for mitigating earthquake hazard on important structures such as bridges, hospitals, and nuclear power plants. Seismically isolated structures should remain essentially elastic for the design earthquake, experiencing minimal or no damage. Steel-reinforced elastomeric bearings are seismic isolation devices that are used extensively for the protection of bridges and other critical infrastructures. Because isolators are critical elements of an isolated structure, they should experience limited, if any, damage during earthquake shaking that exceeds the design level. Damage associated with yielding of the reinforcing steel shims in seismic isolation elastomeric bearings has received limited attention in the literature. In this context, this paper investigates the effect of the steel reinforcement characteristics on the behavior of rubber bearings under combined axial load, shear displacement, and rotation. The potential of damage in the steel shims under design-level shear strains is investigated using a damage factor, , with emphasis placed on the thickness of steel shims. The investigation is carried out using advanced finite element modeling in Abaqus. It is observed that, under large axial loads, thin steel shims (1 and 2 mm) experience extensive yielding regardless of the rotation angle of the top anchor plate; whereas thicker steel shims (4 and 6 mm) remain elastic when the top anchor plate experiences no rotation but can yield when the top plate rotates. Yielding of the steel shims causes permanent deflections and local damage that alter the properties of the isolators.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. 2014. Guide specifications for seismic isolation design. 4th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Aria, M., and R. I. Akbari. 2013. “Condition Evaluation and replacement of elastomeric bearings in road bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9 (9): 918–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2011.638171.
Bergström, J. S., and M. C. Boyce. 1998. “Constitutive modeling of the large strain time-dependent behavior of elastomers.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46 (5): 931–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00075-6.
Bradley, G. L., P. C. Chang, and G. B. Mckenna. 2001. “Rubber modeling using uniaxial test data.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 81 (4): 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1503.
Camara, A., R. Cristantielli, M. A. Astiz, and C. Málaga-Chuquitaype. 2017. “Design of hysteretic dampers with optimal ductility for the transverse seismic control of cable- stayed bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (11): 1811–1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2884.
Crowder, A. P., and T. C. Becker. 2017. “Experimental investigation of elastomeric isolation bearings with flexible supporting columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (7): 04017057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001784.
Dassault Systèmes. 2014a. ABAQUS/CAE 6.13 user’s manual. Abaqus Ver. 6.13 documentation. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes.
Dassault Systèmes. 2014b. Computer program ABAQUS/CAE Version 6.13. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes.
Diani, J., B. Fayolle, and P. Gilormini. 2009. “A review on the Mullins effect.” Eur. Polym. J. 45 (3): 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.11.017.
EN. 2005a. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 2: Bridges. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
EN. 2005b. Structural bearings. Part 3: Elastomeric bearings. EN 1337-3. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
Faridmehr, I., M. H. Osman, A. B. Adnan, A. F. Nejad, R. Hodjati, and M. Azimi. 2014. “Correlation between engineering stress-strain and true stress-strain curve.” Am. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 2 (1): 53–59. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-2-1-6.
Forcellini D., S. A. Mitoulis, and K. N. Kalfas. 2017. “Study on the response of elastomeric bearings with 3D numerical simulations and experimental validation.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 569–577. Rhodes Island, Greece.
Han, X., and G. P. Warn. 2015. “Mechanistic model for simulating critical behavior in elastomeric bearings.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (5): 04014140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001084.
Kalfas, K. N., and S. A. Mitoulis. 2017. “Performance of steel-laminated rubber bearings subjected to combinations of axial loads and shear strains.” Procedia Eng. 199 (Jan): 2979–2984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.533.
Kalfas, K. N., S. A. Mitoulis, and K. Katakalos. 2017a. “Numerical study on bridge elastomeric bearings subjected to large shear strains with emphasis on local tension.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Kalfas, K. N., S. A. Mitoulis, and K. Katakalos. 2017b. “Numerical study on the response of steel-laminated elastomeric bearings subjected to variable axial loads and development of local tensile stresses.” Eng. Struct. 134 (Mar): 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.015.
Karbakhsh Ravari, A., I. Bin Othman, Z. Binti Ibrahim, and K. Ab-Malek. 2012. “P- and end rotation effects on the influence of mechanical properties of elastomeric isolation bearings.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (6): 669–675. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000503.
Kawashima K., K. Kosa, Y. Takahashi, M. Akiyama, T. Nishioka, G. Watanabe, H. Koga, and H. Matsuzaki. 2011. “Damage of bridges during 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake.” In Proc., 43rd Joint Meeting, US-Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects. Tsukuba, Japan: The United States/Japan Cooperative Program in Natural Resources.
Kawashima K., and H. Matsuzaki. 2012. “Damage of road bridges by 2011 Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. of Earthquake Engineering, 24–28. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Kelly, J. M., and D. Konstantinidis. 2009. “Steel shim stresses in multilayer bearings under compression and bending.” J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 4 (6): 1109–1125. https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2009.4.1109.
Kelly, J. M., and D. Konstantinidis. 2011. Mechanics of rubber bearings for seismic and vibration isolation. New York: Wiley.
Kelly, J. M., and S. M. Takhirov. 2004. “Experimental study of steel reinforced rubber bearings with various shim thicknesses.” In Proc., SEM X Int. Congress and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, 7–10. Bethel, CT: Society for Experimental Mechanics.
Kumar, M., and A. S. Whittaker. 2017. “Effect of seismic hazard definition on isolation-system displacements in nuclear power plants.” Eng. Struct. 148 (Oct): 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.003.
Kwon, O. S., and S. H. Jeong. 2013. “Seismic displacement demands on skewed bridge decks supported on elastomeric bearings.” J. Earthquake Eng. 17 (7): 998–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.791894.
Maureira, N., J. De la Llera, C. Oyarzo, and S. Miranda. 2017. “A nonlinear model for multilayered rubber isolators based on a co-rotational formulation.” Eng. Struct. 131 (Jan): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.055.
Mitoulis, S. A. 2015. “Uplift of elastomeric bearings in isolated bridges subjected to longitudinal seismic excitations.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (12): 1600–1615. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.983527.
Mullins, L. 1969. “Softening of rubber by deformation.” Rubber Chem. Technol. 42 (1): 339–362. https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3539210.
Naeim, F., and J. M. Kelly. 1999. Design of seismic isolated structures—From theory to practice. New York: Wiley.
Nagarajaiah, S., and K. Ferrell. 1999. “Stability of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (9): 946–954. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:9(946).
Ogden, W. R. 1972. “Large deformation isotropic elasticity—On the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 326 (1567): 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1972.0026.
Ohsaki, M., T. Miyamura, M. Kohiyama, T. Yamashita, M. Yamamoto, and N. Nakamura. 2015. “Finite-element analysis of laminated rubber bearing of building frame under seismic excitation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (11): 1881–1898. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2570.
Panetsos, P. 2016. “Inspection, assessment and maintenance of Greek concrete bridges bearings: Evaluation of the influence of various types of damage to the structural integrity of bridges.” [In Greek.] In Proc., Panhellenic Concrete Conf., 11–12. Athens, Greece: National Technical Univ. of Athens.
Ragni, L., E. Tubaldi, A. Dall’Asta, and A. Muhr. 2018. “Biaxial shear behaviour of HDNR with Mullins effect and deformation-induced anisotropy.” Eng. Struct. 154 (Jan): 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.060.
Rastgoo Moghadam, S., and D. Konstantinidis. 2017. “Finite element study of the effect of support rotation on the horizontal behavior of elastomeric bearings.” Compos. Struct. 163 (Mar): 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.013.
Stanton, J. F., C. W. Roeder, P. Mackenzie-Helnwein, C. White, C. Kuester, and B. Craig. 2007. Rotation limits for elastomeric bearings. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
Takahashi, Y. 2012. “Damage of rubber bearings and dampers of bridges in 2011 Great East Japan earthquake.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, 1333–1342. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Titirla, M., N. Zarkadoulas, S. A. Mitoulis, and G. Mylonakis. 2017. “Rocking isolation of bridge piers using elastomeric pads.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 9–13. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Tubaldi, E., S. A. Mitoulis, H. Ahmadi, and A. Muhr. 2016. “A parametric study on the axial behaviour of elastomeric isolators in multi-span bridges subjected to horizontal excitations.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 14 (4): 1285–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9876-9.
Van Engelen, N. C., and J. M. Kelly. 2015. “Correcting for the influence of bulk compressibility on the design properties of elastomeric bearings.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (6): 04014170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000891.
Van Engelen, N. C., D. Konstantinidis, and M. J. Tait. 2017a. “Shear strain demands in elastomeric bearings subjected to rotation.” J. Eng. Mech. 143 (4): 04017005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001194.
Van Engelen, N. C., D. Konstantinidis, and M. J. Tait. 2017b. “Simplified approximations for critical design parameters of rectangular fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators.” J. Eng. Mech. 143 (8): 06017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001251.
Van Engelen, N. C., M. J. Tait, and D. Konstantinidis. 2016. “Development of design code oriented formulas for elastomeric bearings including bulk compressibility and reinforcement extensibility.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (6): 04016024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001015.
Weisman, J., and G. P. Warn. 2012. “Stability of elastomeric and lead-rubber seismic isolation bearings.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (2): 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000459.
Xiang, N., and J. Li. 2017. “Experimental and numerical study on seismic sliding mechanism of laminated-rubber bearings.” Eng. Struct. 141 (Jun): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.032.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146 • Issue 10 • October 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 27, 2019
Accepted: Feb 21, 2020
Published online: Jul 16, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 16, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.