Technical Papers
Feb 19, 2020

Multihazard Risk Assessment and Cost–Benefit Analysis of a Bridge–Roadway–Levee System

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 5

Abstract

This paper explores financial aspects of selecting retrofit strategies for an interdependent civil infrastructure system subjected to multiple hazards. A hypothetical bridge–roadway–levee system, subjected to seismic and high-water hazards, is analyzed and retrofit strategies for the levee and bridges of the system are evaluated in terms of risk metrics commonly used in the field of financial engineering for portfolio optimization. The risk metrics include the average annual losses, value at risk or probable maximum losses, conditional value at risk, and worst-case losses. The analysis and evaluation procedures for the system rely on the performance-based earthquake engineering framework, but utilize an event-based approach in a multihazard context and consider both structural and downtime losses. It is shown that an optimal retrofit strategy depends on the risk metric(s) being used for risk evaluation. It is also quantitatively argued that various stakeholders, including the owners, policy makers, and insurance companies, may perceive risks differently, use different metrics for risk evaluation, and come up with different retrofit strategies for risk mitigation of the same system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by a grant from the US Department of Transportation through Region 2 University Transportation Center (award # 69A3551847102—CAIT-UTC-REG 14).

References

Alipour, A., and B. Shafei. 2016. “Seismic resilience of transportation networks with deteriorating components.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001399.
ARTBA (American Road and Transportation Builders Association). 2019. “Frequently asked questions.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://www.artba.org/about/faq/.
Artzner, P., F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, and D. Heath. 1999. “Coherent measures of risk.” Math. Finance 9 (3): 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00068.
Basoz, N., and J. Mander. 1999. Enhancement of the highway transportation lifeline module in HAZUS. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences.
Bocchini, P., and D. M. Frangopol. 2012. “Optimal resilience- and cost-based postdisaster intervention prioritization for bridges along a highway segment.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000201.
Boore, D. M., J. P. Stewart, E. Seyhan, and G. M. Atkinson. 2014. “NGA-West 2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1057–1085. https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS184M.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2016. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
Bruneau, M., et al. 2003. “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra 19 (4): 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497.
Bruneau, M., M. Barbato, J. E. Padgett, A. E. Zaghi, J. Mitrani-Reiser, and Y. Li. 2017. “State of the art of multihazard design.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (10): 03117002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001893.
California Dept. of Water Resources. 2012. Central valley flood management planning program, attachment 8J: Cost estimates (June). Sacramento, CA: California Natural Resources Agency.
Caltrans. 2007. “Contract cost data.” Accessed March 1, 2019. http://sv08data.dot.ca.gov/contractcost/.
Caltrans. 2016a. Seismic retrofit guidelines for bridges in California: Bridge memo to designers. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Caltrans. 2016b. “Vehicle operation cost parameters.” Accessed March 1, 2019. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/eab/benefit_cost/LCBCA-economic_parameters.html.
Caltrans. 2017. “Traffic volumes 2017.” Accessed March 1, 2019. http://www.dot.ca.gov/trafficops/census/volumes2017/.
Caltrans. 2018. “Construction statistics 2018.” Accessed March 1, 2019. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/estimates/Construction_Stats_2018.pdf.
Chai, Y. H., M. J. N. Priestley, and F. Seible. 1991. “Seismic retrofit of circular bridge columns for enhanced flexural performance.” ACI Struct. J. 88 (5): 572–584.
Chang, G., and J. Mander. 1994. Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: Part 1—Evaluation of seismic capacity. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER), State Univ. of New York.
Choi, E. 2002. “Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Cornell, C. A., and H. Krawinkler. 2000. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
DesRoches, R., J. Padgett, K. Ramanathan, and J. Dukes. 2012. Feasibility studies for improving Caltrans bridge fragility relationships. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Field, E., et al. 2009. “Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 2 (UCERF 2).” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99 (4): 2053–2107. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080049.
Field, E. H., T. H. Jordan, and C. A. Cornell. 2003. “OpenSHA: A developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 74 (4): 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.74.4.406.
Filippou, F. C., E. P. Popov, and V. V. Bertero. 1983. Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete joints. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Gardoni, P., F. Guevara-Lopez, and A. Contento. 2016. “The life profitability method (LPM): A financial approach to engineering decisions.” Struct. Saf. 63 (Nov): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.06.006.
Grossi, P., and H. Kunreuther. 2005. Catastrophe modeling: A new approach to managing risk. Boston: Springer.
Guidotti, R., H. Chmielewski, V. Unnikrishnan, P. Gardoni, T. McAllister, and J. van de Lindt. 2016. “Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: The role of network dependencies.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1 (3–4): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999.
Koliou, M., J. van de Lindt, T. Mcallister, B. Ellingwood, M. Dillard, and H. Cutler. 2018. “State of the research in community resilience: Progress and challenges.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547.
Krige, D. G. 1951. “A statistical approach to some mine valuations and allied problems at the Witwatersrand.” M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Witwatersrand.
Kwak, D. Y., J. P. Stewart, S. J. Brandenberg, and A. Mikami. 2016. “Characterization of seismic levee fragility using field performance data.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (1): 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1193/030414EQS035M.
Lee, R., and A. Kiremidjian. 2007. “Uncertainty and correlation for loss assessment of spatially distributed systems.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (4): 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2791001.
Loth, C., and J. W. Baker. 2013. “A spatial cross-correlation model of spectral accelerations at multiple periods.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (3): 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2212.
Mangalathu, S., J.-S. Jeon, and R. DesRoches. 2018. “Critical uncertainty parameters influencing seismic performance of bridges using Lasso regression.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (3): 784–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2991.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Menegotto, M., and P. Pinto. 1973. “Method of analysis of cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under normal force and bending.” In Vol. 13 of Proc., Symp. on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, 15–22. Lisbon, Portugal: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Miller, M., and J. Baker. 2015. “Ground-motion intensity and damage map selection for probabilistic infrastructure network risk assessment using optimization.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (7): 1139–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2506.
Moehle, J., and G. Deierlein. 2004. “A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
National Institute of Building Sciences. 2003. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model, HAZUS-MH MR 4. Washington, DC: FEMA.
NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture. 2010. Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Nielson, B., and R. DesRoches. 2007. “Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (3): 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2756815.
Padgett, J. E. 2007. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of retrofitted bridges using probabilistic methods.” Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Priestley, M. J. N., F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley.
Priestley, M. J. N., F. Seible, Y. Xiao, and R. Verma. 1994. “Steel jacket retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge columns for enhanced shear strength—Part 2: Test results and comparison with theory.” ACI Struct. J. 91 (5): 537–551.
Shamsabadi, A., K. M. Rollins, and M. Kapuskar. 2007. “Nonlinear soil-abutment-bridge structure interaction for seismic performance-based design.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (6): 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(707).
Sharma, N., A. Tabandeh, and P. Gardoni. 2018. “Resilience analysis: A mathematical formulation to model resilience of engineering systems.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 3 (2): 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1345257.
Stergiou, E., and A. Kiremidjian. 2008. Treatment of uncertainties in seismic risk analysis of transportation systems. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Tonn, G., J. Czajkowski, and H. Kunreuther. 2018. “Policy options for improving the resilience of U.S. transportation infrastructure.” Accessed January 15, 2018. https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/issue-brief/v6n6.php.
USACE. 2015. South San Francisco bay shoreline study, Phase 1, Alviso economic impact area. San Francisco: USACE.
USGS. 2019a. “Map of CPT data.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/cpt/data/.
USGS. 2019b. “Surface water for USA: Streamflow measurements.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/measurements?.
USGS. 2019c. “Susceptibility map of the San Francisco Bay area.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://geomaps.wr.usgs.gov/sfgeo/liquefaction/susceptibility.html.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Werner, S., C. Crouse, L. Katafygiotis, and J. Beck. 1993. Model identification and seismic analysis of Meloland Road overcrossing. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Wills, C., and K. Clahan. 2006. “Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96 (4A): 1483–1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050179.
Xu, Y.-L., and L. X. You. 2013. Wind effects on cable-supported bridges. Singapore: Wiley.
Zakeri, B., J. E. Padgett, and G. G. Amiri. 2015. “Fragility assessment for seismically retrofitted skewed reinforced concrete box girder bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (2): 04014043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000502.
Zimmaro, P., J. Stewart, S. J. Brandenberg, D. Y. Kwak, and R. Jongejan. 2018. “Multi-hazard system reliability of flood control levees.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.043.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Mar 28, 2019
Accepted: Sep 10, 2019
Published online: Feb 19, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 19, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alexandros Nikellis, S.M.ASCE
Engineer, Catastrophe Engineering and Analytics, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance, 6111 Bollinger Canyon Rd., Suite 540, San Ramon, CA 94583.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, State Univ. of New York, 212 Ketter Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-330X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share