Technical Papers
Jan 30, 2020

Structural Functionality Scale for Light-Framed Wood Buildings with Indicators for Windstorm Damage

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 4

Abstract

A new, broadly applicable scale for measuring the structural functionality of light-framed wood buildings provides a foundation for progress in disaster and resilience research. Existing scales commonly used in resilience analysis are designed to measure damage and do not resolve functionality, the stated metric of most resilience models. The structural functionality of a building is defined as the ability of the building to provide the primary function as a shelter. Total functionality for a building includes additional nonstructural components, such as electric power, water, and transportation access. The structural functionality scale for light-framed wood buildings is designed to measure structural functionality directly. A set of structural functionality indicators for wind-damaged buildings provides a metric with distinguishable discrete indicators on the continuous structural functionality scale. The structural functionality indicators were designed to provide compatibility with existing scales related to wind damage. General guidelines for similarly metered indicators on the structural functionality scale provide a basis for measuring the impact of other hazards. The structural functionality scale and indicators provide a reference for comparison between resilience models and allow empirical measurements of structural functionality and resilience. Once adopted in conceptual resilience models, the structural functionality scale will provide a basis for validation with empirical measures.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded in part by NOAA VORTEX-SE grant NA16OAR4590219. Damage surveys following Hurricane Harvey were funded by NSF RAPID grant 1759996. Daniel Rhee, Antonio Zaldivar, Guangzhao Chen, Alexander Zickar, Rishabh Moorjani, Amanda R. Lombardo, and Jennifer Vetrone all contributed to the field campaign surveying the recovery of Naplate, IL following tornado damage on February 28, 2017. This survey and the accompanying resilience analysis conducted by The Wind Engineering Research Laboratory at The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign provided inspiration and ongoing real-world reference for the structural functionality scale and indicators.

References

ATC (Applied Technology Council). 2004. ATC-45 field manual: Safety evaluation of buildings after windstorms and floods. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Attary, N., J. W. van de Lindt, H. Mahmoud, and S. Smith. 2019. “Hindcasting community-level damage to the interdependent buildings and electric power network after the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, Tornado.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 20 (1): 04018027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000317.
Attary, N., J. W. van de Lindt, H. Mahmoud, S. Smith, C. M. Navarro, Y. W. Kim, and S. J. Lee. 2018. “Hindcasting community-level building damage for the 2011 Joplin EF5 tornado.” Nat. Hazard. 93 (3): 1295–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3353-5.
Blunden, J., D. S. Arndt, and G. Hartfield. 2018. “State of the climate in 2017.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 99 (8): S140–S141. https://doi.org/10.1175/2018BAMSStateoftheClimate.1.
Bonstrom, H., and R. B. Corotis. 2016. “First-order reliability approach to quantify and improve building portfolio resilience.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001213.
Casari, M., and S. J. Wilkie. 2005. “Sequencing lifeline repairs after an earthquake: An economic approach.” J. Regul. Econ. 27 (1): 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-004-4418-9.
Christensen, J., et al. 2013. “Climate phenomena and their relevance for future regional climate change.” In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, edited by T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cimellaro, G. P., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2010. “Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.” Eng. Struct. 32 (11): 3639–3649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008.
Cimellaro, G. P., C. Renschler, A. M. Reinhorn, and L. Arendt. 2016. “Peoples: A framework for evaluating resilience.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (10): 04016063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001514.
Collins, M., et al. 2013. “Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility.” In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters). 2018. Economic losses, poverty & disasters 1998–2017. Brussels, Belgium: CRED.
Donovan, B., and D. Work. 2017. “Empirically quantifying city-scale transportation system resilience to extreme events.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 79 (Jun): 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.002.
Ellingwood, B. R., D. V. Rosowsky, Y. Li, and J. H. Kim. 2004. “Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (12): 1921–1930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921).
Ellingwood, B. R., D. V. Rosowsky, and W. Pang. 2008. “Performance of light-frame wood residential construction subjected to earthquakes in regions of moderate seismicity.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (8): 1353–1363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:8(1353).
FEMA. 2011. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology—Hurricane model. HAZUS-MH 2.1 technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Fujita, T. 1971. Proposed characterization of tornadoes and hurricanes by area and intensity. Chicago: Satellite and Mesometeorology Research Project, University of Chicago, Department of Geophysical Sciences.
Hassan, E. M., and H. Mahmoud. 2018. “A framework for estimating immediate interdependent functionality of a steel hospital following a seismic event.” Eng. Struct. 168 (Aug): 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.009.
Holliday, L., and T. H.-K. Kang. 2015. “Low-cost earthquake solutions for nonengineered residential construction in developing regions.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (5): 04014141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000630.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Summaries, frequently asked questions, and cross-chapter boxes. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.
Koliou, M., H. Masoomi, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2017. “Performance assessment of tilt-up big-box buildings subjected to extreme hazards: Tornadoes and earthquakes.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (5): 04017060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001059.
Koliou, M., J. W. van de Lindt, T. P. McAllister, B. R. Ellingwood, M. Dillard, and H. Cutler. 2018. “State of the research in community resilience: Progress and challenges.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547.
Lin, P., and N. Wang. 2017. “Stochastic post-disaster functionality recovery of community building portfolios I: Modeling.” Struct. Saf. 69 (Nov): 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.002.
Lombardo, F. T., and B. Ayyub. 2017. “Approach to estimating near-surface extreme wind speeds with climate change considerations.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (3): A4017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000909.
Masoomi, H., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2016. “Tornado fragility and risk assessment of an archetype masonry school building.” Eng. Struct. 128 (Dec): 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.030.
Masoomi, H., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2017. “Restoration and functionality assessment of a community subjected to tornado hazard.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (3): 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1354030.
Matta, F., M. C. Cuéllar-Azcárate, and E. Garbin. 2014. “Earthen masonry dwelling structures for extreme wind loads.” Eng. Struct. 83 (Jan): 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.043.
Memari, M., N. Attary, H. Masoomi, H. Mahmoud, J. van de Lindt, S. Pilkington, and M. R. Ameri. 2018. “Minimal building fragility portfolio for damage assessment of communities subject to tornadoes.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (7): 04018072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002047.
Mensah, A. F., and L. Duenas-Osorio. 2017. “Efficient resilience assessment framework for electric power systems affected by hurricane events.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001423.
Mieler, M. W., and J. Mitrani-Reiser. 2017. “Review of the state of the art in assessing earthquake-induced loss of functionality in buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (3): 04017218. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001959.
NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program). 2008. Strategic plan for the national earthquake hazards reduction program. Gaithersburg, MD: NERHP.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2012. “From state of the climate: Tornadoes for annual 2011.” Accessed December 14, 2018. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/tornadoes/201113.
Ouyang, M., L. Dueñas-Osorio, and X. Min. 2012. “A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems.” Struct. Saf. 36–37 (May–July): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004.
Prevatt, D. O., J. W. Lindt, E. W. Back, A. J. Graettinger, S. Pei, W. Coulbourne, R. Gupta, D. James, and D. Agdas. 2012. “Making the case for improved structural design: Tornado outbreaks of 2011.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 12 (4): 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000192.
Ramseyer, C., R. Floyd, and L. Holliday. 2017. “Performance of enhanced residential building code requirements during the March 35, 2015, Moore tornado.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (5): 04017087. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001070.
Reed, D., M. D. Powell, and J. M. Westerman. 2010. “Energy supply system performance for Hurricane Katrina.” J. Energy Eng. 136 (4): 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000028.
Reed, D., J. Preuss, and P. Jaewook. 2006. “The influence of context on lifeline behavior: Local policies under wind storm and earthquake scenarios.” Nat. Hazard. 39 (2): 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0029-3.
Roueche, D., and D. Prevatt. 2013. “Residential damage patterns following the 2011 Tuscaloosa, AL and Joplin, MO tornados.” J. Disaster Res. 8 (6): 1061–1067. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2013.p1061.
Schott, T., C. Landsea, G. Hafele, J. Lorens, A. Taylor, H. Thurm, B. Ward, M. Willis, and W. Zaleski. 2012. “The Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale.” Accessed January 20, 2019. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/sshws.pdf.
Tokgoz, B. E., and A. V. Gheorghe. 2013. “Resilience quantification and its application to a residential building subject to hurricane winds.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 4 (3): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-013-0012-z.
Trapp, R. J., N. S. Diffenbaugh, and A. Gluhovsky. 2009. “Transient response of severe thunderstorm forcing to elevated greenhouse gas concentrations.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 36 (1): L01703. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036203.
Trapp, R. J., N. S. Diffenbaugh, H. E. Brooks, E. M. Baldwin, E. D. Robinson, and J. S. Pal. 2007. “Changes in severe thunderstorm environment frequency during the 21st century caused by anthropogenically enhanced global radiative forcing.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104 (50): 19719–19723. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705494104.
van de Lindt, J. W., S. Pei, T. Dao, and A. Graettinger. 2013. “Dual-objective-based tornado design philosophy.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (2): 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000622.
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, J. Lin, L. A. Twisdale Jr., A. M. Young, and F. M. Lavelle. 2006. “HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology II: Damage and loss estimation.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 7 (2): 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(94).
Wind Science and Engineering Center. 2006. A recommendation for an enhanced Fujita scale, revision 2. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University.
Zhang, Y., and W. G. Peacock. 2009. “Planning for housing recovery? Lessons learned from Hurricane Andrew.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 76 (1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360903294556.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 4April 2020

History

Received: Jan 29, 2019
Accepted: Aug 12, 2019
Published online: Jan 30, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 30, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1739-3096. Email: [email protected]
Franklin T. Lombardo, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share