Technical Papers
Oct 30, 2019

Hurricane Surge-Wave Building Fragility Methodology for Use in Damage, Loss, and Resilience Analysis

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 1

Abstract

Physics-based fragilities for damage, loss, and resilience analysis are needed to model a community to earthquakes, hurricane winds, tornados, or floods. Currently, most building flood fragilities such as those available in assessment tools such as HAZUS-MH do not account for the hydrodynamic forces caused by surge and waves, only the depth of a flood. In this paper, a methodology to evaluate forces on all building components including windows, doors, walls, and floor systems for elevated coastal buildings under a combination of hurricane surge and waves is proposed. The model was validated by comparing vertical and horizontal forces from existing laboratory test results of a one-tenth-scale elevated structure under wave loading. A full-scale wood-frame residential building was then modeled as an example to illustrate the method and is intended to be representative of an elevated coastal structure in a typical coastal region of the United States. The hurricane was modeled as a combination of two intensity parameters, namely significant wave height and surge level at the building location and is better able to represent the loading condition and thus damage to the structure than static flood alone. Fragility surfaces for four damage states for the building as a whole were generated as a damage combination of all damageable building components. Finally, a comparison of the loss estimated using the fragility surfaces versus the current loss model in HAZUS-MH is provided to illustrate the effect on loss estimates when including wave height in predicting damage for near-coast buildings under hurricane wave and surge. By calibrating the physics-based fragilities with empirical data, the surface fragilities developed in this paper are ready to use in HAZUS-MH or other loss and resilience-focused analysis at the community level for coastal communities subjected to both waves and storm surge during hurricanes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)—Coastal Resilience Center (CRC) headquartered at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Material presented in this paper is the sole opinions of the authors and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the DHS or the CRC.

References

Amini, M. O., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2014. “Quantitative insight into rational tornado design wind speeds for residential wood-frame structures using fragility approach.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (7): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000914.
Ang, A. H.-S., and W. H. Tang. 2007. Probability concepts in engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
ANSYS. 2009. ANSYS fluent theory guide. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS.
Blake, E. S., T. B. Kimberlain, R. J. Berg, J. P. Cangialosi, and J. L. Beven II. 2013. Tropical cyclone report Hurricane Sandy (AL182012) 22–29 October 2012. Miami: National Weather Service, National Hurricane Center.
Bradner, C., T. Schumacher, D. Cox, and C. Higgins. 2011. “Experimental setup for a large-scale bridge superstructure model subjected to waves.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 137 (3): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000059.
Bradner, C., T. Schumacher, D. T. Cox, and C. Higgins. 2008. “Large-scale laboratory measurements of wave forces on highway bridge superstructures.” In Proc., 31st Int. Conf. on Coastal Engineering, 3554–3566. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bulleit, W. M., W. Pang, and D. V. Rosowsky. 2005. “Modeling wood walls subjected to combined transverse and axial loads.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (May): 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(781).
Do, T. Q., J. W. van de Lindt, and D. T. Cox. 2016. “Performance-based design methodology for inundated elevated coastal structures subjected to wave load.” Eng. Struct. 117 (15): 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.046.
FEMA. 2009. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Hurricane model. HAZUS-MH-MR4. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2015. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology; Flood model; Hazus-MH flood model technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2017. Hazus tsunami model technical guidance. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gromala, D. S. 1983. Light-frame wall systems: Performance and predictability. Madison, WI: Forest Products Laboratory.
Gurley, K., J. P. Pinelli, C. Subramanian, A. Cope, L. Zhang, and J. Murphree. 2005. Predicting the vulnerability of typical residential buildings to hurricane damage, Florida public hurricane loss projection model (FPHLPM) engineering team final report. Miami: I.H.R. Center, Florida International Univ.
Hasselmann, K., et al. 1973. Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the joint north sea wave project (JONSWAP). Hamburg, Germany: Deutsches Hydrographisches Institut.
Hughes, S. A. 1984. The TMA shallow-water spectrum description and applications., Vicksburg, MS: USACE.
Kennedy, A., S. Rogers, A. Sallenger, U. Gravois, B. Zachry, M. Dosa, and F. Zarama. 2011. “Building destruction from waves and surge on the Bolivar Peninsula during Hurricane Ike.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 137 (3): 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000061.
Knabb, R. D., J. R. Rhome, and D. P. Brown. 2006. “Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Katrina. Miami: National Hurricane Center.
Kwon, O.-S., E. Kim, and S. Orton. 2011. “Calibration of live-load factor in LRFD bridge design specifications based on state-specific traffic environments.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (Dec): 812–819. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000209.
Linton, D., R. Gupta, D. Cox, and J. van de Lindt. 2015. “Load distribution in light-frame wood buildings under experimentally simulated tsunami loads.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (1): 04014030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000487.
Linton, D., R. Gupta, D. Cox, J. van de Lindt, M. E. Oshnack, and M. Clauson. 2013. “Evaluation of tsunami loads on wood-frame walls at full scale.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (8): 1318–1325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000644.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2006. “Reports from the national data buoy center’s stations in the Gulf of Mexico during the passage of Hurricane Katrina.” Accessed July 11, 2017. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/hurricanes/2005/katrina/.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2017. “Wave heights: Hurricane Sandy 2012.” Accessed March 26, 2019. https://sos.noaa.gov/datasets/wave-heights-hurricane-sandy-2012/.
Padgett, J. E., A. Spiller, and C. Arnold. 2012. “Statistical analysis of coastal bridge vulnerability based on empirical evidence from Hurricane Katrina.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 8 (6): 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470902855343.
Park, H., T. Do, T. Tomiczek, D. T. Cox, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2018. “Numerical modeling of non-breaking, impulsive breaking, and broken wave interaction with elevated coastal structures: Laboratory validation and inter-model comparisons.” Ocean Eng. 158 (Jan): 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.088.
Park, H., T. J. Tomiczek, D. T. Cox, J. W. van de Lindt, and P. Lomonaco. 2017. “Experimental modeling of horizontal and vertical wave forces on an elevated coastal structure.” Coastal Eng. 128: 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.08.001.
SWAN (Simulate Waves Nearshore). 2017. “User manual SWAN Cycle III version 41.20.” Accessed July 11, 2017. http://swanmodel.sourceforge.net/download/zip/swanuse.pdf.
Tomiczek, T., A. Kennedy, and S. Rogers. 2014. “Collapse limit state fragilities of wood-framed residences from storm surge and waves during Hurricane Ike.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 140 (1): 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000212.
van de Lindt, J. W., and G. Fu. 2002. Investigation of the adequacy of current bridge design loads in the State of Michigan. Lansing, MI: Michigan Dept. of Transportation.
van de Lindt, J., R. Gupta, D. T. Cox, and J. Wilson. 2009. “Wave impact study on a residential building.” J. Disaster Res. 4 (6): 419–426.
Winterstein, S. R., A. K. Jha, and S. Kumar. 1999. “Reliability of floating structures: Extreme response and load factor design.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 125 (Aug): 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1999)125:4(163).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 1January 2020

History

Received: Sep 19, 2018
Accepted: May 11, 2019
Published online: Oct 30, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 30, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Trung Q. Do, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctor Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372. Email: [email protected]
John W. van de Lindt, F.ASCE [email protected]
Harold H. Short Endowed Chair, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Daniel T. Cox, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Construction and Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331-2302. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share