Technical Papers
Sep 10, 2019

Probabilistic Evaluation of Seismic Isolation Effects for a California High-Speed Rail Prototype Bridge

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 11

Abstract

Increasingly, seismic isolation (SI) has been adopted in buildings and highway bridges to mitigate damage from earthquakes. However, its appropriateness in high-speed rail (HSR) bridges remains a topic of major concern for engineers and stakeholders. The effects of SI on the response of HSR bridge systems during future earthquakes need to be evaluated probabilistically accounting explicitly for all uncertainties associated with the seismic loading. To this end, this paper compares the probabilistic seismic responses of a California high-speed rail (CHSR) prototype bridge with and without seismic isolation. The uncertainties in the seismic responses for the isolated bridge and nonisolated bridge are quantified and compared to explore the effects of SI when accounting for the uncertainty of the seismic input. The probabilistic seismic response is evaluated using two alternative approaches, and the less restrictive—but computationally more expensive—approach is selected to quantify the beneficial and detrimental effects of SI for the CHSR prototype bridge. The pros and cons of SI identified in probabilistic terms require a trade-off design in applying SI to HSR bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Support of this research by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center’s Transportation Systems Research Program under Award No. 1107-NCTRCJ, with Prof. Stephen Mahin (deceased) as the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center director, is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

AREMA (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association). 2007. Manual for railway engineering. Lanham, MD: AREMA.
Baker, J. W. 2005. “Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Barbato, M., F. Petrini, V. U. Unnikrishnan, and M. Ciampoli. 2013. “Performance-based hurricane engineering (PBHE) framework.” Struct. Saf. 45 (Nov): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.07.002.
Bosco, M., and E. M. Marino. 2013. “Design method and behavior factor for steel frames with buckling restrained braces.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (8): 1243–1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2269.10.1002/eqe.2269.
Boulanger, R. W., C. J. Curras, B. L. Kutter, D. W. Wilson, and A. Abghari. 1999. “Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analysis.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 125 (9): 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750).
Buckle, I., and R. Mayes. 1990. “Seismic isolation: History, application, and performance: A world view.” Earthquake Spectra 6 (2): 161–201. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585564.
Campbell, K., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2008. “NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD, and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s.” Earthquake Spectra 24 (1): 139–171. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2857546.
CHSRA (California High-speed Rail Authority). 2012. California high-speed train project design criteria. San Francisco: CHSRA.
CHSRA (California High-speed Rail Authority). 2015. Project update report to the California State Legislature. San Francisco: CHSRA.
Ciampoli, M., and F. Petrini. 2012. “Performance-based Aeolian risk assessment and reduction for tall buildings.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 28 (Apr): 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.08.013.
Cornell, C. A., and H. Krawinkler. 2000. “Progress and challenges in seismic performance.” PEER Center News 3: 1–3.
Deb, S. K. 2004. “Seismic base isolation: An overview.” Spec. Sect. Geotech. Earthquake Hazards 87 (10): 1426–1430.
Deierlein, G. G. 2004. “Overview of a comprehensive framework for earthquake performance assessment.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on Performance-Based Seismic Design—Concepts and Implementation., edited by P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Guerrini, G., J. Restrepo, M. Massari, and A. Vervelidis. 2015. “Seismic behavior of post-tensioned self-centering precast concrete dual-shell steel columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001054.
Hamburger, R. O., and A. S. Whittaker. 2003. “Considerations in performance-based blast resistant design of steel structures.” In Proc., AISC-SINY Symp. on Resisting Blast and Progressive Collapse. New York: AISC.
Higashino, M., and S. Okamoto, eds. 2006. Response control and seismic isolation of buildings. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Hwang, J., L. Sheng, and J. Gates. 1994. “Practical analysis of bridges on isolation bearings with bi-linear hysteresis characteristics.” Earthquake Spectra 10 (4): 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585794.
Iemura, H., S. Iwata, and K. Murata. 2004. “Shake table tests and numerical modeling of seismically isolated railway bridges.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, Canada: World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
Kelly, J. M. 1996. “Aseismic base isolation: Review and bibliography.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 13 (Oct): 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(86)90006-0.
Krawinkler, H. 2002. “A general approach to seismic performance assessment.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Advances and New Challenges in Earthquake Engineering, edited by J. M. Ko and Y. L. Xu, 620. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ.
Kunde, M. C., and R. S. Jangid. 2003. “Seismic behavior of isolated bridges: A-state-of-the-art review.” Electron. J. Struct. Eng. 3: 140–170. https://doi.org/10.1.1.469.9074&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Lamont, S., and D. Rini. 2008. “Performance-based structural fire engineering for modern building design.” In Proc., ASCE SEI Structures Congress, 1–12. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Li, Y. 2014. “Probabilistic performance-based optimum seismic design of seismic isolation for California high-speed rail prototype bridge.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California, San Diego.
Li, Y., R. Astroza, J. P. Conte, and P. Soto. 2017. “Nonlinear FE model updating and reconstruction of the response of an instrumented seismic isolated bridge to the 2010 Maule Chile earthquake.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (15): 2699–2716. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2925.
Li, Y., and J. P. Conte. 2016. “Effects of seismic isolation on the seismic response of a California high-speed rail prototype bridge with soil-structure and track-structure interactions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (15): 2415–2434. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2770.
Liu, T., T. Zordan, B. Briseghella, and Q. L. Zhang. 2014. “Simplified linear static analysis for base-isolated buildings with friction pendulum systems.” Struct. Eng. Int. 24 (4): 490–502. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686614X13854694314405.
Moehle, J. P., B. Stojadinovic, A. Der Kiureghian, and T. Y. Yang. 2005. Application of PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Naeim, F., and J. M. Kelly. 1999. Design of seismic isolated structures: From theory to practice. Los Angeles: Wiley.
Nagarajaiah, S., and X. Sun. 2000. “Response of base isolated USC hospital building in Northridge earthquake.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10): 1177–1186. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1177).
Petrangeli, M., C. Tamagno, and P. Tortolini. 2008. “Numerical analysis of track-structure interaction and time domain resonance.” J. Rail Rapid Transitions 222 (4): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT168.
Petrini, F. 2009. “A probabilistic approach to performance-based wind engineering (PBWE).” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Univ. of Rome La Sapienza.
Porter, K. A. 2003. “An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), edited by A. Der-Kiureghian, S. Madanat, and J. M. Pestana. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress.
Pradeep Kumar, T. V., and D. K. Paul. 2007. “Force-deformation behavior of isolation bearings.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (4): 527–529. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:4(527).
Railway Technical Research Institute. 1999. Railway structure design standard—Seismic design, 89–90. Tokyo: Maruzen.
Riggs, H. R., I. N. Robertson, K. F. Cheung, G. Pawlak, Y. L. Young, and S.-C.-S. Yim. 2008. “Experimental simulation of tsunami hazards to buildings and bridges.” In Proc., 2008 NSF CMMI Engineering Research and Innovation Conf. Knoxville, TN: National Science Foundation, Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation.
Robinson, W. H. 1995. “Recent research and applications of seismic isolation in New Zealand.” Bull. New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 28 (4): 253–264.
Sarlis, A., D. Pasala, M. Constantinou, A. Reinhorn, S. Nagarajaiah, and D. Taylor. 2013. “Negative stiffness device for seismic protection of structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (7): 1124–1133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000616.
Sarrazin, M., O. Moroni, C. Neira, and B. Venegas. 2013. “Performance of bridges with seismic isolation bearings during the Maule earthquake, Chile.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 47 (Apr): 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.06.019.
Shome, N., C. A. Cornell, P. Bazzurro, and J. E. Carballo. 1998. “Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses.” Earthquake Spectra 14 (3): 469–500. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011.
Stewart, J., J. Conte, and I. Aiken. 1999. “Observed behavior of seismically isolated buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (9): 955–964. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:9(955).
Symans, M., F. Charney, A. Whittaker, M. Constantinou, C. Kircher, M. Johnson, and R. McNamara. 2008. “Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: Current practice and recent developments.” J. Struct. Eng. 1 (3): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(3).
Tang, H., H. Wang, B. Zhou, and L. Chen. 2011. “Study on seismic isolation of high-speed railway bridge fabricated lead rubber bearings.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 80–81 (Jul): 409–413.
USGS. 2008. “2008 PSHA interactive deaggregation.” Accessed January 3, 2012. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/.
Warn, G. P., and K. L. Ryan. 2012. “A review of seismic isolation for buildings: Historical development and research needs.” Buildings 2 (3): 300–325. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2030300.
Zhang, R., and T. Soong. 1992. “Seismic design of viscoelastic dampers for structural applications.” J. Struct. Eng. 118 (5): 1375–1392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1375).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 145Issue 11November 2019

History

Received: Aug 16, 2017
Accepted: Feb 20, 2019
Published online: Sep 10, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 10, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9. Email: [email protected]
Joel P. Conte, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share