Technical Papers
Jun 28, 2019

Simulation of Hurricane Wind Fields for Community Resilience Applications: A Data-Driven Approach Using Integrated Asymmetric Holland Models for Inner and Outer Core Regions

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 9

Abstract

Accurate modeling of the damage caused by hurricanes making landfall to physical infrastructure relies on the accurate modeling of temporally and spatially varying wind fields. However, wind field measurements from past events only include the wind field data at discrete time points separated by hours. In community-scale modeling, a hurricane wind field of a desired strength for the purpose of resilience planning (including investigation of mitigation alternatives) may be needed for a community of interest that has not experienced such a prior event, thereby necessitating simulation of a hurricane wind field of a specified strength with an arbitrary landfall location. In this context, this paper proposes a novel data-driven simulation technique to simulate temporally and spatially varying hurricane wind fields for the purposes of hindcasting and synthetic scenario analysis based on integrated asymmetric Holland models. First, the backward Holland model (i.e., Lambert W function) is used to derive the time-varying model parameters from measurement data of historical events. Then the data-driven model parameters are adopted in the forward Holland model to simulate snapshots of missing times for historical events or realistic synthetic events with a synthetic track passing close to the community of interest (e.g., for the purpose of community resilience planning). To achieve high simulation accuracy, the wind fields for inner and outer core regions are modeled separately by two sets of asymmetric Holland models, whose parameters are estimated using two different branches of the Lambert W function and in the end are integrated to represent the entire wind field. In addition, the sudden change of the surface wind speed due to the roughness change from water to land is explicitly modeled using a speed conversion process. In this way, the proposed technique successfully overcomes two shortcomings of the existing Holland-type models, that is, poor representation of the wind field in the inner core region and the inability to model surface wind speed change due to roughness changes. The performance of the proposed data-driven simulation technique is illustrated in examples of simulations for both historical and synthetic hurricanes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided as part of the cooperative agreement 70NANB15H044 between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Colorado State University. The content expressed in this presentation is the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent the opinions or views of NIST or the US Department of Commerce.

References

Batts, M. E., M. R. Cordes, L. R. Russell, J. R. Shaver, and E. Simiu. 1980. Hurricane wind speeds in the United States. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
Chen, Y., and M. K. Yau. 2003. “Asymmetric structures in a simulated landfalling hurricane.” J. Atmos. Sci. 60 (18): 2294–2312. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060%3C2294:ASIASL%3E2.0.CO;2.
Cooper, C. K. 1988. “Parametric models of hurricane-generated winds, waves, and currents in deep water.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Cui, W., and L. Caracoglia. 2016. “Exploring hurricane wind speed along US Atlantic coast in warming climate and effects on predictions of structural damage and intervention costs.” Eng. Struct. 122 (Sep): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.003.
Done, J. M., K. M. Simmons, and J. Czajkowski. 2018. “Relationship between residential losses and hurricane winds: Role of the Florida building code.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (1): 04018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000947.
Georgiou, P. N. 1985. “Design windspeeds in tropical cyclone-prone regions.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Western Ontario.
Georgiou, P. N., A. G. Davenport, and B. J. Vickery. 1983. “Design wind speeds in regions dominated by tropical cyclones.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 13 (1): 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90136-8.
Harper, B. A. 1999. “Numerical modelling of extreme tropical cyclone winds.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 83 (1): 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00059-8.
Harper, B. A., R. J. Sobey, and K. P. Stark. 1977. Numerical simulation of tropical cyclone storm surge along the Queensland coast. Townsville, Australia: Dept. of Civil and Systems Engineering, James Cook Univ. of North Queensland.
Holland, G. J. 1980. “An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes.” Mon. Weather Rev. 108 (8): 1212–1218. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108%3C1212:AAMOTW%3E2.0.CO;210.
Holland, G. J., J. I. Belanger, and A. Fritz. 2010. “A revised model for radial profiles of hurricane winds.” Mon. Weather Rev. 138 (12): 4393–4401. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3317.1.
Hu, K., Q. Chen, and S. K. Kimball. 2012. “Consistency in hurricane surface wind forecasting: An improved parametric model.” Nat. Hazards 61 (3): 1029–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9960-z.
Kaplan, J., and M. DeMaria. 1995. “A simple empirical model for predicting the decay of tropical cyclone winds after landfall.” J. Appl. Meteorol. 34 (11): 2499–2512. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034%3C2499:ASEMFP%3E2.0.CO;2.
Lee, J. Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2017. “A decision model for intergenerational life-cycle risk assessment of civil infrastructure exposed to hurricanes under climate change.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 159 (Mar): 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.022.
Lee, K. H., and D. V. Rosowsky. 2007. “Synthetic hurricane wind speed records: Development of a database for hazard analyses and risk studies.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 8 (2): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:2(23).
Li, S. H., and H. P. Hong. 2015. “Observations on a hurricane wind hazard model used to map extreme hurricane wind speed.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (10): 04014238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001217.
Mattocks, C., and C. Forbes. 2008. “A real-time, event-triggered storm surge forecasting system for the state of North Carolina.” Ocean Modell. 25 (3): 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.06.008.
Powell, M. D. 1982. “The transition of the Hurricane Frederic boundary-layer wind field from the open Gulf of Mexico to landfall.” Mon. Weather Rev. 110 (12): 1912–1932. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110%3C1912:TTOTHF%3E2.0.CO;2.
Powell, M. D., P. P. Dodge, and M. L. Black. 1991. “The landfall of Hurricane Hugo in the Carolinas: Surface wind distribution.” Weather Forecasting 6 (3): 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1991)006%3C0379:TLOHHI%3E2.0.CO;2.
Powell, M. D., S. H. Houston, and T. A. Reinhold. 1996a. “Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in South Florida. Part I: Standardizing measurements for documentation of surface wind fields.” Weather Forecasting 11 (3): 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1996)011%3C0304:HALISF%3E2.0.CO;2.
Powell, M. D., S. H. Houston, and T. A. Reinhold. 1996b. “Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in South Florida. Part II: Surface wind fields and potential real-time applications.” Weather Forecasting 11 (3): 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1996)011%3C0329:HALISF%3E2.0.CO;2.
Powell, M. D., G. Soukup, S. Cocke, S. Gulati, N. Morisseau-Leroy, S. Hamid, N. Dorst, and L. Axe. 2005. “State of Florida hurricane loss projection model: Atmospheric science component.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 93 (8): 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.05.008.
Powell, M. D., E. W. Uhlhorn, and J. D. Kepert. 2009. “Estimating maximum surface winds from hurricane reconnaissance measurements.” Weather Forecasting 24 (3): 868–883. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2007087.1.
Powell, M. D., P. J. Vickery, and T. A. Reinhold. 2003. “Reduced drag coefficient for high wind speeds in tropical cyclones.” Nature 422 (6929): 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01481.
Queensland Government. 2001. Queensland climate change and community vulnerability to tropical cyclones: Ocean hazards assessment-Stage 1. Brisbane, Australia: Dept. of Natural Resources and Mines, Queensland Government.
Russell, L. R. 1968. “Probability distribution for Texas Gulf coast hurricane effects of engineering interest.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Salman, A. M., and Y. Li. 2017. “Assessing climate change impact on system reliability of power distribution systems subjected to hurricanes.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (1): 04016024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000316.
Schwerdt, R. W., F. P. Ho, and R. W. Watkins. 1979. Meteorological criteria for standard project hurricane and probable maximum hurricane wind fields, Gulf and East Coasts of the United States. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Commerce.
Shapiro, L. J. 1983. “The asymmetric boundary layer flow under a translating hurricane.” J. Atmos. Sci. 40 (8): 1984–1998. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040%3C1984:TABLFU%3E2.0.CO;2.
Simiu, E., and R. H. Scanlan. 1986. Wind effects on structures. New York: Wiley.
Simiu, E., P. Vickery, and A. Kareem. 2007. “Relation between Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale wind speeds and peak 3-s gust speeds over open terrain.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (7): 1043–1045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(1043).
Sparks, P. R., and Z. Huang. 2001. “Gust factors and surface-to-gradient wind-speed ratios in tropical cyclones.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 89 (11): 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00098-8.
Thompson, E. F., and V. J. Cardone. 1996. “Practical modeling of hurricane surface wind fields.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 122 (4): 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1996)122:4(195).
Tryggvason, V. J., A. G. Davenport, and D. Surry. 1976. “Predicting wind-induced response in hurricane zones.” J. Struct. Div. 102 (12): 2333–2350.
Vickery, P. J., F. J. Masters, M. D. Powell, and D. Wadhera. 2009a. “Hurricane hazard modeling: The past, present, and future.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 97 (7): 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.05.005.
Vickery, P. J., P. F. Skerlj, A. C. Steckley, and L. A. Twisdale. 2000. “Hurricane wind field model for use in hurricane simulations.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (10): 1203–1221. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1203).
Vickery, P. J., and D. Wadhera. 2008. “Statistical models of Holland pressure profile parameter and radius to maximum winds of hurricanes from flight-level pressure and H*Wind data.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 47 (10): 2497–2517. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1837.1.
Vickery, P. J., D. Wadhera, M. D. Powell, and Y. Chen. 2009c. “A hurricane boundary layer and wind field model for use in engineering applications.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 48 (2): 381–405. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1841.1.
Vickery, P. J., D. Wadhera, A. Twisdale Lawrence, and M. Lavelle Francis. 2009b. “US hurricane wind speed risk and uncertainty.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (3): 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:3(301).
Wang, C., H. Zhang, K. Feng, and Q. Li. 2017. “A simple gradient wind field model for translating tropical cyclones.” Nat. Hazards 88 (1): 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2882-7.
Willoughby, H. E., R. W. R. Darling, and M. E. Rahn. 2006. “Parametric representation of the primary hurricane vortex. Part II: A new family of sectionally continuous profiles.” Mon. Weather Rev. 134 (4): 1102–1120. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3106.1.
Willoughby, H. E., and M. E. Rahn. 2004. “Parametric representation of the primary hurricane vortex. Part I: Observations and evaluation of the Holland (1980) model.” Mon. Weather Rev. 132 (12): 3033–3048. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2831.1.
Xiao, Y. F., Z. D. Duan, Y. Q. Xiao, J. P. Ou, L. Chang, and Q. S. Li. 2011. “Typhoon wind hazard analysis for southeast China coastal regions.” Struct. Saf. 33 (4): 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.04.003.
Xie, L., S. Bao, L. J. Pietrafesa, K. Foley, and M. Fuentes. 2006. “A real-time hurricane surface wind forecasting model: Formulation and verification.” Mon. Weather Rev. 134 (5): 1355–1370. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3126.1.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 145Issue 9September 2019

History

Received: Apr 2, 2018
Accepted: Jan 2, 2019
Published online: Jun 28, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yanlin Guo, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
John van de Lindt, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share