Influence of Middle Member Thickness on Properties of Double-Shear Nail Joints
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 8
Abstract
For three-member nail joints under double shear loading, the Canadian timber design standard specifies a minimum thickness of the middle member of eight times the diameter of the nail (8d). This requirement has created difficulties in the specification of midply shear wall because of the use of the relatively thin wood-based sheathing as middle member in the sheathing-to-lumber joints. The objective of this project was to evaluate if the European Yield Model adopted in the Canadian timber design standard can still provide acceptable prediction of strength and failure mode of double-shear nail joint that has middle member thickness less than 8d. Six groups of double-shear nail joints, covering two nail sizes and three sheathing thicknesses, were tested under both monotonic and reversed cyclic loads. Six parallel groups of single-shear nail joints were also tested. The effect of nail penetration into the point-side member was investigated through testing of two groups with different nail lengths with all other parameters being equal. The test results show that the European Yield Model can still be used to estimate the strength and failure mode of double-shear nail joints when the center member has a thickness much less than 8d. Therefore, a value of 2.5d is recommended on the basis of this test project. The nail penetration into the point-side member does not affect the strength of joints when the penetration length is more than 5d.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASTM. 2011. Standard test methods for cyclic (reversed) load test for shear resistance of vertical elements of the lateral force resisting systems for buildings. ASTM E2126-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Aune, P., and M. Patton-Mallory. 1986. Lateral load-bearing capacity of nailed joints based on the yield theory: Experimental verification. Madison, WI: Forest Products Laboratory, US Dept. of Agriculture.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of timber structures. Part 1-1: General: Common rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 5, PrEN 1995-1-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. Engineering design in wood. CSA O86-14. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA.
Källsner, B., and U. A. Girhammar. 2009. “Plastic models for analysis of fully anchored light-frame timber shear walls.” Eng. Struct. 31: 2171–2181.
Ni, C. 1997. “Behaviour of nailed timber joints under reversed cyclic load.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of New Brunswick.
Ni, C., Y. H. Chui, and E. Karacabeyli. 2012. “Mechanics-based approach for determining the shear resistances of shearwalls and diaphragms.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc.
Ni, C., M. Follesa, M. Popovski, and E. Karacabeyli. 2008. “Assessment of seismic design parameters for midply wood shear wall system.” In Proc., 10th World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc.
NZS (New Zealand Standards). 1993. Timber structures standard. NZS 3603. Wellington, New Zealand: NZS.
Pei, S., J. W. van de Lindt, C. Ni, and S. E. Pryor. 2010. “Experimental seismic behavior of a five-storey double-midply wood shear wall in a full scale building.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 37 (9): 1261–1269. https://doi.org/10.1139/L10-058.
Varoglu, E., E. Karacabeyli, S. Stiemer, and C. Ni. 2006. “Midply wood shear wall system: Concept and performance in static and cyclic testing.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (9): 1417–1425. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:9(1417).
Varoglu, E., E. Karacabeyli, S. Stiemer, C. Ni, M. Buitelaar, and D. Lungu. 2007. “Midply wood shear wall system: Performance in dynamic testing.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (7): 1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(1035).
Wang, Q. 2009. “Relationship between fastening properties and load-deflection response of wood shear walls.” M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of New Brunswick.
Whale, L. R. J., I. Smith, and H. J. Larsen. 1987. “Design of nailed and bolted joints proposals for the revision of existing formulae in draft Eurocode 5 and the CIB code.” In Proc., International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation, Working Commission W18-Timber Structures. Lyngby, Denmark: Danish Timber Information.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 29, 2017
Accepted: Feb 28, 2018
Published online: May 30, 2018
Published in print: Aug 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.