Technical Papers
Jun 29, 2017

Empirical Approach to Evaluating the Tornado Fragility of Residential Structures

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 9

Abstract

Tornado-induced wind load modeling has advanced significantly in recent years, but comparison of the experimental or numerical models to observed tornado damage is limited. This paper describes the development of empirically derived tornado fragility functions for residential structures following the 22 May 2011 Joplin, Missouri tornado. The fragility functions were created by combining a residential structure damage assessment of the Joplin tornado using the enhanced Fujita (EF) scale and a tornado wind field model conditioned to tree-fall patterns. The damage states for the fragility functions used the degrees of damage (DOD) for one- and two-story residential structures from the EF scale. The empirical tornado fragility functions were compared to analytically derived fragility functions for straightline winds from the FEMA Hazus hurricane model to provide a first attempt at ascertaining how different or similar failure wind speeds are for residential structures under tornado-induced and straightline wind loads. Median failure wind speeds from the empirical tornado fragility functions increased monotonically with DOD, from 33.4  m/s for DOD1 to 85.6  m/s for DOD9. Median failure wind speeds of the empirical tornado fragility functions and Hazus hurricane straightline wind fragility functions differed by 5% or less when suburban terrain was assumed throughout the damage path, and 25% or less when open terrain was assumed. The results suggest that tornado load amplification factors are at worst no more than 55% for residential structures, and may be lower than 10%.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. GM02432 and 1150975. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

Amini, M., and van de Lindt, J. (2013). “Quantitative insight into rational tornado design wind speeds for residential wood-frame structures using fragility approach.” J. Struct. Eng., 04014033.
ArcGIS 10.2 [Computer software]. ESRI, Redlands, CA.
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, VA.
Baker, G. L., and Church, C. R. (1979). “Measurements of core radii and peak velocities in modeled atmospheric vortices.” J. Atmos. Sci., 36(12), 2413–2424.
Blanchard, D. O. (2013). “A comparison of wind speed and forest damage associated with tornadoes in northern Arizona.” Weather Forecasting, 28(2), 408–417.
Brooks, H., and Doswell, C. A. (2001). “Some aspects of the international climatology of tornadoes by damage classification.” Atmos. Res., 56(1–4), 191–201.
Collins, K. R., and Stojadinovic, B. (2000). “Limit states for performance-based design.” 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
Davies-Jones, R., Trapp, R. J., and Bluestein, H. B. (2001). “Tornadoes and tornadic storms.” Severe convective storms, C. A. Doswell, ed., American Meteorological Society, Boston, 167–221.
Ellingwood, B. R., Rosowsky, D. V., Li, Y., and Kim, J. (2004). “Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards.” J. Struct. Eng., 1921–1930.
FEMA. (2012). “Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Hurricane model technical manual.” Hazus-MH 2.1—Technical manual, Dept. of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.
Fleming, M. R., Haan, F. L., and Sarkar, P. P. (2013). “Turbulent structure of tornado boundary layers with translation and surface roughness.” 12th Americas Conf. on Wind Engineering, American Association for Wind Engineering, Fort Collins, CO.
Grayson, M., Pang, W., and Schiff, S. (2013). “Building envelope failure assessment framework for residential communities subjected to hurricanes.” Eng. Struct., 51, 245–258.
Haan, F. L., Balaramudu, V. K., and Sarkar, P. P. (2010). “Tornado-induced wind loads on a low-rise building.” J. Struct. Eng., 106–116.
Hamid, S., et al. (2010). “Predicting losses of residential structures in the state of Florida by the public hurricane loss evaluation model.” Stat. Method., 7(5), 552–573.
Hancilar, U., Taucer, F., and Corbane, C. (2013). “Empirical fragility functions based on remote sensing and field data after the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(4), 1275–1310.
Herbin, A. H., and Barbato, M. (2012). “Fragility functions for building envelope components subject to windborne debris impact.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 107, 285–298.
Ingargiola, J., and Tezak, S. (2010). “The new FEMA 320 and FEMA 361—Highlights of the wind and flood hazards criteria for the design and construction of residential and community safe rooms (shelters).” Proc., 5th Congress on Forensic Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 163–174.
Karstens, C. D., Samaras, T. M., Lee, B. D., Gallus, W. A., and Finley, C. A. (2010). “Near-ground pressure and wind measurements in tornadoes.” Mon. Weather Rev., 138(7), 2570–2588.
Kikitsu, H., Sarkar, P. P., and Haan, F. L. (2011). “Experimental study on tornado-induced loads of low-rise buildings using a large tornado simulator.” 13th Int. Conf. on Wind Engineering, International Association for Wind Engineering, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kopp, G. A., Hong, E., Gavanski, E., Stedman, D., and Sills, D. M. (2017). “Assessment of wind speeds based on damage observations from the Angus (Ontario) Tornado of 17 June 2014.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 44(1), 37–47.
Kopp, G. A., Morrison, M. J., and Henderson, D. J. (2012). “Full-scale testing of low-rise, residential buildings with realistic wind loads.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 104–106, 25–39.
Kosiba, K. A., and Wurman, J. (2013). “The three-dimensional structure and evolution of a tornado boundary layer.” Weather Forecasting, 28(6), 1552–1561.
Kuligowski, E. D., Lombardo, F. T., Phan, L. T., Levitan, M. L., and Jorgensen, D. P. (2014). “Technical investigation of the May 22, 2011, Tornado in Joplin, Missouri.” NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 428.
Kutner, M. H. (2005). Applied linear statistical models, McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston.
Lallemant, D., Kiremidjian, A., and Burton, H. (2015). “Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility functions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(9), 1373–1389.
Lee, K. H., and Rosowsky, D. V. (2005). “Fragility assessment for roof sheathing failure in high wind regions.” Eng. Struct., 27(6), 857–868.
Lewellen, W. S. (1993). “Tornado vortex theory.” The tornado: Its structure, dynamics, prediction and hazards, C. Church, D. Burgess, C. Doswell, and R. Davies-Jones, eds., American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1–637.
Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2006). “Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment.” Eng. Struct., 28(7), 1009–1018.
Lombardo, F. T., Roueche, D. B., and Prevatt, D. O. (2015). “Comparison of two methods of near-surface wind speed estimation in the 22 May, 2011 Joplin, Missouri tornado.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 138, 87–97.
McDonald, J. R., Mehta, K. C., and Mani, S. (2006). “A recommendation for an enhanced Fujita scale (EF-Scale), Revision 2.” Wind Science and Engineering, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX.
Milton, J. S., and Arnold, J. C. (2003). Introduction to probability and statistics: Principles and applications for engineering and the computing sciences, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Molinaro, A. M., Simon, R., and Pfeiffer, R. M. (2005). “Prediction error estimation: A comparison of resampling methods.” Bioinformatics, 21(15), 3301–3307.
Morrison, M. J., and Kopp, G. A. (2011). “Performance of toe-nail connections under realistic wind loading.” Eng. Struct., 33(1), 69–76.
Mosleh, A., and Apsotolakis, G. (1986). “The assessment of probability distributions from expert opinions with an application to seismic fragility functions.” Risk Anal., 6(4), 447–461.
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Analytical seismic fragility functions for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(3), 615–633.
Nishijima, K., Maruyama, T., and Graf, M. (2012). “A preliminary impact assessment of typhoon wind risk of residential buildings in Japan under future climate change.” Hydrol. Res. Lett., 6, 23–28.
NRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission). (2017). “Title 10, code of federal regulations.” Washington, DC, 854.
O’Rourke, M. J., and So, P. (2000). “Seismic fragility functions for on-grade steel tanks.” Earthquake Spectra, 16(4), 801–815.
Paarlberg, K., and Bowman, D. (2013). “ICC 500–2008: ICC/NSSA standard for the design and construction of storm.” Proc., 2012 ATC & SEI Conf. on Advances in Hurricane Engineering. Learning from Our Past, ASCE, Reston, VA, 826–836.
Pita, G. L., Pinelli, J.-P., Gurley, K. R., and Hamid, S. (2013). “Hurricane vulnerability modeling: Development and future trends.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 114, 96–105.
Pitilakis, K., Crowley, H., and Kaynia, A. (2014). SYNER-G: Typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Porter, K. (2007). “Fragility of hydraulic elevators for use in performance-based earthquake engineering.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(2), 459–469.
Porter, K., Kennedy, R., and Bachman, R. (2007). “Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(2), 471–489.
Prevatt, D. O., et al. (2012a). “Making the case for improved structural design: Tornado outbreaks of 2011.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng., 254–270.
Prevatt, D. O., Agdas, D., Thompson, A., Tamura, Y., Matsui, M., and Okada, R. (2015). “Tornado damage and impacts on nuclear facilities in the United States.” J. Wind Eng., 40(3), 91–100.
Prevatt, D. O., Coulbourne, W., Graettinger, A. J., Pei, S., Gupta, R., and Grau, D. (2012b). Joplin, Missouri, Tornado of May 22, 2011: Structural damage survey and case for Tornado-resilient building codes, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Prevatt, D. O., Roueche, D. B., and Coulborne, W. (2014). “Tornadoes and ASCE 7: The proposed tornado design commentary for ASCE 7-16.” Structures Congress, Boston.
Priestley, M. J. N. (2000). “Performance based seismic design.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng., 33(3), 325–346.
Ramsdell, J. V., and Rishel, J. P. (2007). Tornado climatology of the contiguous United States, Division of Risk Assessment and Special Projects, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
Rosowsky, D. V., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2002). “Performance-based engineering of wood frame housing: Fragility analysis methodology.” J. Struct. Eng., 32–38.
Roueche, D. B. (2016). “Fragility functions and uncertainty models for tornado-induced wind loads and structural response of low-rise buildings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Roueche, D. B., Prevatt, D. O., Haan, F. L., and Datin, P. L. (2015). “An estimate of tornado loads on a wood-frame building using database-assisted design methodology.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 138, 27–35.
Sabareesh, G. R., Matsui, M., and Tamura, Y. (2013). “Ground roughness effects on internal pressure characteristics for buildings exposed to tornado-like flow.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 122, 113–117.
Samaras, T. M., and Lee, J. J. (2004). “Pressure measurements within a large tornado.” Proc., Combined Preprints: 84th American Meteorological Society (AMS) Annual Meeting, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 6053–6061.
Standohar-Alfano, C., and van de Lindt, J. (2015). “Empirically based probabilistic tornado hazard analysis of the United States using 1973–2011 data.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 16(1), 04014013.
van de Lindt, J., et al. (2013). “Dual-objective-based tornado design philosophy.” J. Struct. Eng., 251–263.
van de Lindt, J. W., and Dao, T. N. (2009). “Performance-based wind engineering for wood-frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng., 169–177.
Vickery, P., Skerlj, P., Lin, J., Twisdale, L., Young, M., and Lavelle, F. (2006). “Hazus-MH hurricane model methodology. II: Damage and loss estimation.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 94–103.
Wurman, J., Kosiba, K., and Robinson, P. (2013). “In situ, Doppler radar, and video observations of the interior structure of a tornado and the wind-damage relationship.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94(6), 835–846.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 143Issue 9September 2017

History

Received: Nov 11, 2015
Accepted: Mar 22, 2017
Published online: Jun 29, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Nov 29, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, 475 Weil Hall, Gainesville, FL 32608 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-6759. E-mail: [email protected]
Franklin T. Lombardo, A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
David O. Prevatt, M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, 475 Weil Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share