Technical Papers
Jun 23, 2017

Effect of Modeling Assumptions on the Earthquake-Induced Losses and Collapse Risk of Steel-Frame Buildings with Special Concentrically Braced Frames

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 9

Abstract

This paper quantifies the collapse risk and earthquake-induced economic losses of steel-frame buildings with special concentrically braced frames designed in urban California. A probabilistic building-specific loss estimation methodology that can explicitly account for the main sources of variability related to seismic hazards and structural response is used for this purpose. It is shown that, depending on the choice of the loss metric, at seismic events with low probability of occurrence (i.e., 2% probability of occurrence in 50 years), losses because of demolition and structural collapse in steel-frame buildings with special concentrically braced frames designed in highly seismic zones may be significantly overestimated when ignoring the contribution of the composite floor and gravity framing system to the analytical model building representation. For frequent and moderately frequent seismic events (i.e., 50 and 10% probability of exceedance over 50 years of building life expectancy), acceleration-sensitive nonstructural component repairs govern building losses regardless of the analytical model representation used. For the same seismic events, an appreciable contributor to total losses in steel-frame buildings with special concentrically braced frames is structural repairs because of steel brace flexural buckling. It is suggested that dual-parameter rather than drift-based steel brace fragility curves should be used in loss computations conditioned on a single seismic intensity. Otherwise, the expected annual losses should be used as a metric for building-specific loss assessment of steel-frame buildings with special concentrically braced frames.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study is based on work supported by the Fonds de recherché du Québec—Nature et technologies, Projet de Recherché en Equipe, Award No. FQRNT 2013-PR-167747. Financial support was also provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF Award No. 200021_169248). The financial support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

AISC. (2005). “Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings.” ANSI/AISC 341-05, Chicago.
AISC. (2010). “Specification for structural steel buildings.” ANSI/AISC 360-10, Chicago.
Aitchison, J., and Brown, J. A. C. (1957). The lognormal distribution with special reference to its uses in economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
ASCE. (2006). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE/SEI 7-05, Reston, VA.
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA.
Aslani, H., and Miranda, E. (2005). “Fragility assessment of slab-column connections in existing non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings.” J. Earthquake Eng., 9(6), 777–804.
ASTM. (2007). “Standard specification for cold-formed welded and seamless carbon steel structural tubing in rounds and shapes.” ASTM A500-07, West Conshohocken, PA.
Baradaran Shoraka, M., Yang, T. Y., and Elwood, K. J. (2013). “Seismic loss estimation of non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(2), 297–310.
Borzouie, J., MacRae, G. A., Chase, J. G., and Clifton, G. C. (2014). “Experimental studies on cyclic behaviour of steel base plate connections considering anchor bolts post tensioning.” Proc., 2014 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Conf., New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand.
Chopra, A. K. (2011). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Clifton, G. C., Bruneau, M., MacRae, G., Leon, R., and Fussell, A. (2011). “Steel structures damage from the Christchurch earthquake series of 2010 and 2011.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng., 44(4), 297–318.
Cornell, C. A., and Krawinkler, H. (2000). “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.” PEER Center News, 3(2), 1–3.
Deierlein, G. G., and Victorsson, V. (2008). “Fragility curves for components of steel SMF systems.”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
Dyanati, M., Huang, Q., and Roke, D. (2015). “Life cycle cost-benefit evaluation of self-centering and conventional concentrically braced frames.” Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP12, International Civil Engineering Risk and Reliability Association, Berkeley, CA.
Eads, L., Miranda, E., Krawinkler, H., and Lignos, D. G. (2013). “An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(1), 25–41.
Eads, L., Miranda, E., and Lignos, D. G. (2015). “Average spectral acceleration as an intensity measure for collapse risk assessment.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(12), 2057–2073.
Elkady, A., and Lignos, D. G. (2015). “Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(8), 1289–1307.
Fahnestock, L. A., et al. (2014). “Reserve capacity and implications for seismic collapse prevention for low-ductility braced frames in moderate seismic regions.” Proc., 10th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
FEMA. (2009). “Quantification of building seismic performance factors.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2012). “Seismic performance assessment of buildings, volume 1—Methodology.”, Washington, DC.
Flores, F. X., Charney, F. A., and Lopez-Garcia, D. (2014). “Influence of the gravity framing system on the collapse performance of special steel moment frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 101, 351–362.
Flores, F. X., Charney, F. A., and Lopez-Garcia, D. (2016). “The influence of gravity column continuity on the seismic performance of special steel moment frame structures.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 118, 217–230.
Givens, M. J., Stewart, J. P., Haselton, C. B., and Mazzoni, S. (2012). “Assessment of soil-structure interaction modeling strategies for response history analysis of buildings.” Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo.
Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H. (1999). “Seismic demands for the performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures.”, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Han, S.-W., Kim, W. T., and Foutch, D. A. (2007). “Seismic behavior of HSS bracing members according to width-thickness ratio under symmetric cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Eng., 264–273.
Haselton, C. B., Baker, J. W., Liel, A. B., and Deierlein, G. G. (2011). “Accounting for ground-motion spectral shape characteristics in structural collapse assessment through an adjustment for epsilon.” J. Struct. Eng., 332–344.
Hsiao, P.-C., Lehman, D. E., and Roeder, C. W. (2013). “A model to simulate special concentrically braced frames beyond brace fracture.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(2), 183–200.
Hwang, S.-H., Elkady, A., Bardaweel, S. A., and Lignos, D. G. (2015). “Earthquake loss assessment of steel frame buildings designed in highly seismic regions.” Proc., 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical Univ. of Athens, Athens, Greece, 1496–1512.
Hwang, S.-H., and Lignos, D. G. (2017). “Earthquake-induced loss assessment of steel frame buildings with special moment frames designed in highly seismic regions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., in press.
Ibarra, L. F., Medina, R. A., and Krawinkler, H. (2005). “Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(12), 1489–1511.
Ji, X., Kato, M., Wang, T., Hitaka, T., and Nakashima, M. (2009). “Effect of gravity columns on mitigation of drift concentration for braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(12), 2148–2156.
Kanvinde, A. M., Grilli, D. A., and Zareian, F. (2012). “Rotational stiffness of exposed column base connections: Experiments and analytical models.” J. Struct. Eng., 549–560.
Karamanci, E., and Lignos, D. G. (2014). “Computational approach for collapse assessment of concentrically braced frames in seismic regions.” J. Struct. Eng., A4014019.
Kazantzi, A. K., and Vamvatsikos, D. (2015). “Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(15), 2677–2694.
Kohrangi, M., Bazzurro, P., and Vamvatsikos, D. (2016). “Vector and scalar IMs in structural response estimation. Part II: Building demand assessment.” Earthquake Spectra, 32(3), 1525–1543.
Li, Y., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2012). “Loss-based formulation for multiple hazards with application to residential buildings.” Eng. Struct., 38, 123–133.
Liel, A. B., and Deierlein, G. G. (2013). “Cost-benefit evaluation of seismic risk mitigation alternatives for older concrete frame buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(4), 1391–1411.
Lignos, D. G., and Karamanci, E. (2013). “Drift-based and dual-parameter fragility curves for concentrically braced frames in seismic regions.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 90, 209–220.
Lignos, D. G., and Krawinkler, H. (2011). “Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading.” J. Struct. Eng., 1291–1302.
Liu, J., and Astaneh-Asl, A. (2000). “Cyclic testing of simple connections including effects of slab.” J. Struct. Eng., 32–39.
MacRae, G., Clifton, G. C., Bruneau, M., Kanvinde, A., and Gardiner, S. (2015). “Lessons from steel structures in Christchurch earthquakes.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA), Tongji Univ., Shanghai, China, 1474–1481.
MacRae, G. A., Kimura, Y., and Roeder, C. (2004). “Effect of column stiffness on braced frame seismic behavior.” J. Struct. Eng., 381–391.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
McKenna, F. T. (1997). “Object oriented finite element programming frameworks for analysis, algorithms and parallel computings.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Mitrani-Reiser, J. (2007). “An ounce of prevention: probabilistic loss estimation for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
NIST. (2010). “Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors.”, Gaithersburg, MD.
NIST. (2012a). “Soil-structure interaction for building structures.”, Gaithersburg, MD.
NIST. (2012b). “Tentative framework for development of advanced seismic design criteria for new buildings.”, Gaithersburg, MD.
NZS (Standards New Zealand). (2007). “Steel structures standard, incorporating amendments No. 1 and No. 2.”, Wellington, New Zealand.
OpenSees [Computer software]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Pei, S., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2009). “Methodology for earthquake-induced loss estimation: An application to woodframe buildings.” Struct. Saf., 31(1), 31–42.
Porter, K. A., Kiremidjian, A. S., and LeGrue, J. S. (2001). “Assembly-based vulnerability of buildings and its use in performance evaluation.” Earthquake Spectra, 17(2), 291–312.
Porter, K. A., Scawthorn, C. R., and Beck, J. L. (2006). “Cost-effectiveness of stronger woodframe buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(1), 239–266.
Ramirez, C. M., et al. (2012). “Expected earthquake damage and repair costs in reinforced concrete frame buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(11), 1455–1475.
Ramirez, C. M., and Miranda, E. (2012). “Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(11), 1477–1493.
Ray-Chaudhuri, S., and Hutchinson, T. C. (2011). “Effect of nonlinearity of frame buildings on peak horizontal floor acceleration.” J. Earthquake Eng., 15(1), 124–142.
Rodriguez, M. E., Restrepo, J. I., and Carr, A. J. (2002). “Earthquake-induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 693–718.
Roeder, C. W., Lumpkin, E. J., and Lehman, D. E. (2011). “A balanced design procedure for special concentrically braced frame connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(11), 1760–1772.
Roeder, C. W., Lumpkin, E. J., and Lehman, D. E. (2012). “Seismic performance assessment of concentrically braced steel frames.” Earthquake Spectra, 28(2), 709–727.
RS Means Corporation. (2013). RS Means Square Foot Costs, Kingston, MA.
Song, R., Li, Y., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2016). “Loss estimation of steel buildings to earthquake mainshock-aftershock sequences.” Struct. Saf., 61, 1–11.
Stoakes, C. D., and Fahnestock, L. A. (2011). “Cyclic flexural testing of concentrically braced frame beam-column connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 739–747.
Storie, L. B., Pender, M. J., Clifton, G. C., and Wotherspoon, L. M. (2014). “Soil-foundation-structure interaction for buildings on shallow foundations in the Christchurch earthquake.” Proc., Tenth U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
Tremblay, R. (2002). “Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 58(5–8), 665–701.
Tremblay, R., Filiatrault, A., Bruneau, M., Nakashima, M., Prion, H. G. L., and DeVall, R. (1996). “Seismic design of steel buildings: Lessons from the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake.” Can. J. Civil Eng., 23(3), 727–756.
Tremblay, R., Filiatrault, A., Timler, P., and Bruneau, M. (1995). “Performance of steel structures during the 1994 Northridge earthquake.” Can. J. Civil Eng., 22(2), 338–360.
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491–514.
Zareian, F., and Kanvinde, A. (2013). “Effect of column-base flexibility on the seismic response and safety of steel moment-resisting frames.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(4), 1537–1559.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 143Issue 9September 2017

History

Received: Aug 10, 2016
Accepted: Mar 21, 2017
Published online: Jun 23, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Nov 23, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Seong-Hoon Hwang [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, EPFL ENAC IIC RESSLab, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2K6. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Dimitrios G. Lignos, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, EPFL ENAC IIC RESSLab, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share