Technical Papers
Jan 23, 2017

Shake-Table Response of a Coupled RC Wall with Thin T-Shaped Piers

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 5

Abstract

A shake-table test of a 1:3 scale model of a thin, lightly reinforced concrete (RC), 5-story coupled wall, representing a typical apartment building with a high wall-to-floor area ratio, was performed. The wall consisted of two T-shaped piers, faced to each other by the webs, which were connected at each story level by the coupling beam and slab. The wall was subjected to a series of uniaxial and biaxial seismic excitations. Two different structural details providing different degrees of confinement were used at the free edges without boundary columns. The lightly confined free edges of the flanges (using hairpin transverse reinforcement) behaved satisfactorily in the case of moderate seismic demand. Due to the beam–slab interaction and the slab, which was considerably ticker than in typical buildings, the coupling beams were much stronger than expected, causing brittle shear failure of the overloaded wall piers under bidirectional excitation. The analyzed wall developed substantial strength and low ductility. The main observations of the experiment were confirmed by the results of postexperimental analytical studies performed using a three-dimensional (3D) multiple vertical-line element model, which has been incorporated into a well-known open-code program system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The presented research was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia, and by the ECOLEADER Project “Seismic Performance of Lightly Reinforced Structural Walls in Low to Moderate Seismicity Areas,” as part of the Enhancing Access to Research Infrastructures, Human Potential Program of the European Commission. The shake table test was performed by the National Laboratory for Civil Engineering (LNEC) in Lisbon. The test and numerical analyses were performed by Peter Kante.

References

ABAQUS 6.3 [Computer software]. Dassault Systèmes, Waltham, MA.
Alarcon, C., Hube, M. A., and de la Llera, J. C. (2014). “Effect of axial loads in the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete walls with unconfined wall boundaries. ” Eng. Struct., 73, 13–23.
ANACAP 2.5 [Computer software]. ANATECH, San Diego.
Bentz, E. C. (2000). “Sectional analysis of reinforced concrete members.” Ph.D. thesis, Graduate Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
Beyer, K., Dazio, A., and Priestley, M. J. N. (2008). “Quasi-static cyclic tests of two U-shaped reinforced concrete walls.” J. Earthquake Eng., 12(7), 1023–1053.
Boroschek, R., Bonelli, P., Restrepo, J. I., Retamales, R., and Contreras, V. (2014). “Lessons from the 2010 Chile earthquake for performance based design and code development.” Performance-based seismic engineering: Vision for an earthquake resilient society, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 143–157.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2004a). “Design of concrete structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.”, Brussels, Belgium.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2004b). “Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.”, Brussels, Belgium.
Combescure, D., and Chaudat, T. (2002). “ICONS European program Seismic Tests on R/C Bearing Walls—CAMUS 3 Specimen.”, CEA, Seclay, Paris.
Elwood, K. J., Pampanin, S., Kam, W. Y., and Priestley, N. (2014). “Performance-based issues from the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake.” Performance-based seismic engineering: Vision for an earthquake resilient society, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 159–175.
ESMD (European strong motion database). (2015). “European strong motion database.” ⟨http://www.isesd.hi.is/ESD_Local/frameset.htm⟩ (Mar. 26, 2015).
Fajfar, P., Duhovnik, J., Reflak, J., Fischinger, M., and Breska, Z. (1981). “The behavior of buildings and other structures during the earthquakes of 1979 in Montenegro.”, Univ. of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Fischinger, M., Isakovic, T., and Kante, P. (2004a). “Implementation of a macro model to predict seismic response of RC structural walls.” Comput. Concr., 1(2), 211–226.
Fischinger, M., Isakovic, T., and Kante, P. (2004b). “Seismic vulnerability evaluation of lightly reinforced walls.” Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
Fischinger, M., Isakovic, T., and Kante, P. (2006). “Shaking table response of a thin H-shaped coupled wall.” Managing Risk in Earthquake Country: 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conf.: Centennial Meeting, Disaster Resistant California Conf.: Proc. (CD-ROM), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, San Francisco.
Fischinger, M., Rejec, K., and Isakovic, T. (2014). “Inelastic shear response of RC walls—A challenge in performance based design and assessment.” Performance-based seismic engineering: Vision for an earthquake resilient society, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 347–363.
Harris, G. H., and Sabnis, G. M. (1999). Structural modeling and experimental techniques, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Ile, N., and Reynouard, J. M. (2003). “Lightly reinforced walls subjected to multi-directional seismic excitations: Interpretation of CAMUS 2000-1 dynamic tests.” ISET J. Earthquake Tech., 40(2–4), 117–135.
Kante, P. (2005). “Potresna ranljivost armiranobetonskih sten [Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete walls].” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia (in Slovenian).
Lowes, L. N., Lehman, D. E., Birely, A. C., Kuchma, D. A., Marley, K. P., and Hart, C. R. (2012). “Earthquake response of slender planar concrete walls with modern detailing.” Eng. Struct., 43, 31–47.
Massone, L. M. (2013). “Fundamental principles of the reinforced concrete design code changes in Chile following the Mw 8.8 earthquake in 2010.” Eng. Struct., 56, 1335–1345.
Nagae, T., et al. (2011). “Design and instrumentation of the 2010 E-defense four-story reinforced concrete and post-tensioned concrete buildings.”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
OpenSees 1.6.0 [Computer software]. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Panagiotou, M. M., Restrepo, J. I., and Conte, J. P. (2011). “Shake-table test of a full-scale 7-story building slice. Phase I: Rectangular wall.” J. Struct. Eng., 691–704.
Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, Wiley, New York, 98–106.
Response-2000 version 1.1 [Computer software]. Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
Reynouard, J. M., and Fardis, M. N. eds. (2001). “Shear wall structures.”, Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisbon, Portugal, 240.
Takahashi, S., et al. (2013). “Flexural drift capacity of reinforced concrete wall with limited confinement.” ACI Struct. J., 110(1), 95–104.
Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P. (1986). “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI Struct. J., 83(2), 219–231.
Wallace, J. W., and Moehle, J. P. (1993). “Evaluation of ductility and detailing requirements of bearing wall buildings using data from the March 3, 1985, Chile Earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, 9(1), 137–156.
Welt, T., Qureishi, A., LaFave, J., Lehman, D., and McCabe, S. (2014). “Performance of slender reinforced concrete structural walls under significant lateral loads.” Proc., 10th U.S. National Conf. in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Anchorage, AK.
Wood, S. L. (1991). “Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the 1985 Chile earthquake: Implications for the design of structural walls.” Earthquake Spectra, 7(4), 607–638.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 143Issue 5May 2017

History

Received: Mar 27, 2015
Accepted: Oct 5, 2016
Published online: Jan 23, 2017
Published in print: May 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Jun 23, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matej Fischinger, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Univ. of Ljubljana, Jamova 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Peter Kante, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Assistant, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Univ. of Ljubljana, Jamova 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected]
Tatjana Isakovic, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Univ. of Ljubljana, Jamova 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share