Technical Papers
Jan 13, 2016

Performance-Based Comparison of Different Storm Mitigation Techniques for Residential Buildings

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 6

Abstract

In recent years, severe hurricanes have caused enormous economic losses for society and placed tremendous burden on the insurance industry. As the number of residential buildings in hurricane prone regions continues to rise, hurricane hazard mitigation is of paramount importance for residential buildings. Although different retrofit measures are available to mitigate hurricane damage and to reduce the associated social and economic losses, choosing the most cost-effective ones is still an engineering challenge. This paper uses the performance-based hurricane engineering (PBHE) framework with multilayer Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) for the loss analysis of residential buildings subject to hurricane hazard. A highly efficient modified version of the multilayer MCS technique based on copula is proposed for the faster re-evaluation of hurricane risk when different hurricane hazard mitigation strategies are considered for the same building. This technique is combined with cost-benefit analysis to provide effective decision making tools based on the performance comparison of different design and retrofit solutions. A realistic case study is presented to illustrate the proposed methodology by comparing the cost-effectiveness of several commonly used hurricane hazard mitigation techniques and design alternatives for a typical residential building.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Partial support of this research by: (1) the Longwell’s Family Foundation through the Fund for Innovation in Engineering Research (FIER) Program, (2) the Louisiana Board of Regents through the Economic Development Assistantship Program, and (3) the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries through award #724534, is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

Alphonso, T. C., and Barbato, M. (2014). “Experimental fragility curves for aluminum storm panels subject to windborne debris impact.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 134, 44–55.
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” Reston, VA.
Augusti, G., and Ciampoli, M. (2008). “Performance-based design in risk assessment and reduction.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 23(4), 496–508.
Baker, C. J. (2007). “The debris flight equations.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 95(5), 329–353.
Barbato, M., Petrini, F., Unnikrishnan, V. U., and Ciampoli, M. (2013). “Performance-based hurricane engineering (PBHE) framework.” Struct. Saf., 45, 24–35.
Batts, M. E., Cordes, M. R., Russell, L. R., Shaver, J. R., and Simiu, E. (1980). “Hurricane wind speeds in the United States.”, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Bjarnadottir, S., Li, Y., and Stewart, M. G. (2011). “A probabilistic-based framework for impact and adaptation assessment of climate change on hurricane damage risks and costs.” Struct. Saf., 33(3), 173–185.
Bradley, B. A., Lee, D. S., Broughton, R., and Price, C. (2009). “Efficient evaluation of performance-based earthquake engineering equations.” Struct. Saf., 31(1), 65–74.
Chouinard, L., and Liu, C. (1997). “Model for recurrence rate of hurricanes in Gulf of Mexico.” J. Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Eng., 113–119.
Chow, C. K., and Liu, C. N. (1968). “Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees.” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 14(3), 462–467.
Conte, J. P., and Zhang, Y. (2007). “Performance-based earthquake engineering: Application to an actual bridge-foundation-ground system.” Proc., 12th Italian National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Associazione Nazionale Italiana di Ingegneria Sismica (ANIDIS), Rome.
Cornell, C. A., and Krawinkler, H. (2000). “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.” PEER Center News, 3(2), 1–4.
Datin, P., Prevatt, D., and Pang, W. (2010). “Wind-uplift capacity of residential wood roof-sheathing panels retrofitted with insulating foam adhesive.” J. Archit. Eng., 144–154.
Der Kiureghian, A., and Liu, P. (1986). “Structural reliability under incomplete probability information.” J. Eng. Mech., 85–104.
Ellingwood, B., Rosowsky, D., Li, Y., and Kim, J. (2004). “Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards.” J. Struct. Eng., 1921–1930.
FEMA. (2007a). “Multi-hazard estimation methodology—Hurricane model.”, Dept. of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2007b). “USACE hurricane debris estimating model.” FEMA-325, Dept. of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2012). “HAZUS-MH 2.1 hurricane model technical manual.” Washington, DC.
Frangopol, D., Lin, K., and Estes, A. (1997). “Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 1390–1401 .
Grayson, M., Pang, W., and Schiff, S. (2012). “Three-dimensional probabilistic wind-borne debris trajectory model for building envelope impact risk assessment.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 102, 22–35.
Grayson, M., Pang, W., and Schiff, S. (2013). “Building envelope failure assessment framework for residential communities subjected to hurricanes.” Eng. Struct., 51, 245–258.
Gurley, K., Pinelli, J. P., Subramanian, C., Cope, A., Zhang, L., and Murphree, J. (2005). “Predicting the vulnerability of typical residential buildings to hurricane damage.”, I.H.R. Center, Florida International Univ., Miami.
Herbin, A. H., and Barbato, M. (2012). “Fragility curves for building envelope components subject to windborne debris impact.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 107–108, 285–298.
Holmes, J. D. (2004). “Trajectories of spheres in strong winds with application to wind-borne debris.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 92(1), 9–22.
Holmes, J. D. (2010). “Windborne debris and damage risk models: A review.” Wind Struct., 13(2), 95–108.
Huang, Z., Rosowsky, D. V., and Sparks, P. R. (2001). “Long-term hurricane risk assessment and expected damage to residential structures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 74(3), 239–249.
IEM. (2001). “Iowa environmental mesonet database.” 〈http://www.mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/request/download.phtml?network=FL_ASOS〉 (Apr. 16, 2014).
Jalayer, F., and Cornell, C. A. (2003). “A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor design (DCFD) seismic formats.”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Leicester, R. H., Bubb, C. T. J., Dormant, C., and Beresford, F. D. (1980). “An assessment of potential cyclone damage to dwellings in Australia.” Wind engineering, J. E. Cermak, ed., Pergamon, New York, 23–36.
Li, Y. (2010). “Assessment of damage risks to residential buildings and cost-benefit of mitigation strategies considering hurricane and earthquake hazards.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 7–16.
Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2006). “Hurricane damage to residential construction in the us: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment.” Eng. Struct., 28(7), 1009–1018.
Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2009). “Framework for multihazard risk assessment and mitigation for wood-frame residential construction.” J. Struct. Eng., 159–168.
Li, Y., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2012). “Loss-based formulation for multiple hazards with application to residential buildings.” Eng. Struct., 38, 123–133.
Liel, A. B., and Deierlein, G. G. (2013). “Cost-benefit evaluation of seismic risk mitigation alternatives for older concrete frame buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(4), 1391–1411.
Lin, N., Holmes, J., and Letchford, C. (2007). “Trajectories of wind-borne debris in horizontal winds and applications to impact testing.” J. Struct. Eng., 274–282 .
Lin, N., and Vanmarcke, E. (2008). “Windborne debris risk assessment.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 23(4), 523–530.
Lungu, D., and Rackwitz, R. (2001). “Joint committee on structural safety– probabilistic model code. Part 2: Loads.” 〈∼http://www.jcss.byg.dtu.dk/~/media/Subsites/jcss/english/publications/probabilistic_model_code/part_ii〉 (Oct. 5, 2013).
Masters, F. J., Gurley, K. R., Shah, N., and Fernandez, G. (2010). “The vulnerability of residential window glass to lightweight windborne debris.” Eng. Struct., 32(4), 911–921.
Myers, V. A., and Ho, F. P. (1975). “Joint probability method of tide frequency analysis applied to apalachicola bay and St. George sound, florida.”, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, MD.
NAHB. (2000). “A state-of-the-art review and application of engineering information for light-frame homes, apartments, and townhouses.” U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, DC.
Nelsen, R. B. (2007). An introduction to copulas, Springer, New York.
NIST. (2005). “Extreme wind speed data sets: Hurricane wind speeds.” 〈http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/winds/hurricane.htm〉 (Mar. 10, 2011).
Petrini, F. (2009). “A probabilistic approach to performance-based wind engineering (PBWE).” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Rome “La Sapienza,” Rome.
Pielke, R., Gratz, J., Landsea, C., Collins, D., Saunders, M., and Musulin, R. (2008). “Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 29–42.
Pinelli, J., et al. (2004). “Hurricane damage prediction model for residential structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 1685–1691 .
Pinelli, J. P., Torkian, B. B., Gurley, K., Subramanian, C., and Hamid, S. (2009). “Cost effectiveness of hurricane mitigation measures for residential buildings.” Proc., 11th American Conf. on Wind Engineering (ACWE), International Association of Wind Engineering (IAWE). San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Porter, K. A. (2003). “An overview of peer’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), Millpress, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 973–980.
Porter, K. A., Kiremidjian, A. S., and LeGrue, J. S. (2001). “Assembly-based vulnerability of buildings and its use in performance evaluation.” Earthquake Spectra, 17(2), 291–312.
Russel, L. R. (1971). “Probability distributions of hurricane effects.” J. Waterways Harbors Coastal Eng. Div., 97(1), 139–154.
Sklar, A. (1959). “Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges.” Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de L’Université de Paris, Paris, 229–231.
Stewart, M., Rosowsky, D., and Huang, Z. (2003). “Hurricane risks and economic viability of strengthened construction.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 12–19.
Stubbs, N., and Perry, D. (1996). “Damage simulation model for buildings and contents in a hurricane environment.” Proc., Building an International Community of Structural Engineers-14th ASCE Structures Congress, ASCE, Chicago, 989–996.
Tang, X.-S., Li, D.-Q., Zhou, C.-B., Phoon, K.-K., and Zhang, L.-M. (2013). “Impact of copulas for modeling bivariate distributions on system reliability.” Struct. Saf., 44, 80–90.
Twisdale, L. A., Vickery, P. J., and Steckley, A. C. (1996). “Analysis of hurricane wind-borne debris impact risk for residential structures.”, Applied Research Associates, Raleigh, NC.
Unnikrishnan, V. U. (2015). “Probabilistic performance-based hurricane engineering (PBHE) framework.” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State Univ. and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA.
Unnikrishnan, V. U., and Barbato, M. (2015). “Performance-based comparison of different design alternatives and retrofit techniques for residential buildings subjected to hurricane hazard.” Structures Congress 2015, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1596–1607.
van de Lindt, J., and Dao, T. (2009). “Performance-based wind engineering for wood-frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng., 169–177.
Vickery, P., Skerlj, P., and Twisdale, L. (2000). “Simulation of hurricane risk in the U.S. Using empirical track model.” J. Struct. Eng., 1222–1237.
Vickery, P., and Twisdale, L. (1995). “Prediction of hurricane wind speeds in the United States.” J. Struct. Eng., 1691–1699 .
Wills, J. A. B., Lee, B. E., and Wyatt, T. A. (2002). “A model of wind-borne debris damage.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 90(4–5), 555–565.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142Issue 6June 2016

History

Received: May 21, 2015
Accepted: Nov 3, 2015
Published online: Jan 13, 2016
Published in print: Jun 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 13, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Vipin U. Unnikrishnan, S.M.ASCE
Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523; formerly, Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental. Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803.
Michele Barbato, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share