Technical Papers
Jul 7, 2015

Tornado Risk Analysis for Residential Wood-Frame Roof Damage across the United States

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 1

Abstract

Approximately 1,200 tornadoes impact the United States every year with a percentage of these resulting in significant damage, injuries, and fatalities. Initially, a probabilistic tornado hazard analysis was performed in order to develop tornado hazard curves at select locations across the United States. This analysis resulted in the annual probability of experiencing a tornado of any strength at the specific locations, which varied as a function of location-specific occurrence rates. Five different residential wood-frame building archetypes were designed at each of the locations based on current residential building code and/or practice. Fragilities for the roof sheathing and truss to wall top-plate connections were developed for each archetype. Because fragilities are independent of location, they were then convolved with the tornado hazard curves to compute annual failure probabilities for select roof components. This represents the first time absolute risk of roof failure due to tornadoes has been computed since the tornado hazard curve is convolved with the fragility curves. These probabilities quantify failure probabilities of residential wood-frame roofs to tornado winds. While this value is quite small for an individual home, applying this method to an individual city block or neighborhood can quantify a location’s vulnerability to tornado wind damage. The Florida state building code is applied to other locations in the United States, fragilities are developed and convolved, and failure probabilities for these modified buildings are computed. The comparison of failure probabilities between local building code and the stricter Florida residential building code allowed for a quantitative assessment of strengthened construction practices for structures subjected to tornadic wind loads. Results indicate that stricter building codes may be beneficial in areas with a high annual tornado risk, such as Tornado Alley.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of Colorado State University and the George T. Abell Professorship funds.

References

Amini, M. O. (2012). “Determination of rational tornado design wind speed for residential woodframe structures.” Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 1–92.
Amini, M. O., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2014). “Quantitative insight into rational tornado design wind speeds for residential wood-frame structures using fragility approach.” J. Struct. Eng., 1–15.
APA—The Engineered Wood Association. (2011). “Approximate engineering dead load weights of wood structural panels.”, Tacoma, WA.
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” Reston, VA.
Banik, S. S., Hong, H. P., and Kopp, G. A. (2007). “Tornado hazard assessment for southern Ontario.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 34(7), 830–842.
Chowdhury, A. G., Canino, I., Mirmiran, A., Suksawang, N., and Baheru, T. (2012). “Wind-loading effects on roof-to-wall connections of timber residential buildings.” J. Eng. Mech., 1–44.
Conner, H. W., Gromala, D. S., and Burgess, D. W. (1987). “Roof connections in houses: Key to wind resistance.” J. Struct. Eng., 2459–2474.
Datin, P. L., Prevatt, D. O., and Pang, W. (2011). “Wind-uplift capacity of residential wood roof-sheathing panels retrofitted with insulating foam adhesive.” J. Archit. Eng., 144–154.
Ellingwood, B. R., Rosowsky, D. V., Li, Y., and Kim, J. H. (2004). “Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards.” J. Struct. Eng., 1921–1930.
Ellingwood, B. R., and Tekie, P. B. (1999). “Wind load statistics for probability-based structural design.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(4), 1921–1930.
FRC (Florida Residential Building Code). (2010). International code council, Country Club Hills, IL.
Gardner, A., et al. (2000). “The tornadoes of Oklahoma City of May 3, 1999.” Wind Science and Engineering Research Center, 1–38.
Gurley, K. R., and Masters, F. J. (2011). “Post-2004 hurricane field survey of residential building performance.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 177–183.
Haan, F. L., Jr., Balaramudu, V. K., and Sarkar, P. P. (2010). “Tornado-induced wind loads on a low-rise building.” J. Struct. Eng., 106–116.
IRC. (2009). “International residential code for one- and two-family dwellings.” International Code Council, Country Club Hills, IL.
IRC. (2012). “International residential code for one- and two-family dwellings.” International Code Council, Country Club Hills, IL.
Jordan, J. (2007). “Tornado damage assessment for structural engineers.” Forensic Eng., 1–17.
Keith, E. L., and Rose, J. D. (1994). “Hurricane Andrew—Structural performance of buildings in south Florida.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 178–191.
Kopp, G. A., and Morrison, M. J. (2011). “Discussion of ‘Tornado-Induced wind loads on a low rise building’ by F. L. Hann Jr., Vasanth Kumar Balaramudu, and P. P. Sarkar.” J. Struct. Eng., 1620–1622.
Lee, K. H., and Rosowsky, D. V. (2005). “Fragility assessment for roof sheathing failure in high wind regions.” Eng. Struct., 27(6), 857–868.
Luco, N., Ellingwood, B. R., Hamburger, R. O., Hooper, J. D., Kimball, J. K., and Kircher, C. A. (2007). “Risk-targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States.” Structural Engineers Association of California 2007 Convention Proc., Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA.
Marshall, T. P. (2002). “Tornado damage survey at Moore, Oklahoma.” Weather Forecasting, 17(3), 582–598.
Morrison, M. J., and Kopp, G. A. (2011). “Performance of toe-nail connections under realistic wind loading.” Eng. Struct., 33(1), 69–76.
ORC (Oregon Residential Specialty Code). (2011). International code council, Country Club Hills, IL.
Pan, K., Montpellier, P., and Zadeh, M. (2002). “Engineering observations of May 3, 1999 Oklahoma tornado damage.” Weather Forecasting, 17(3), 599–610.
Prevatt, D. O., et al. (2011a). “Damage study and future direction for structural design following the Tuscaloosa tornado of 2011.” National Science Foundation, 1–56.
Prevatt, D. O., et al. (2012). “Making the case for improved structural design: Tornado outbreaks of 2011.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng., 254–270.
Prevatt, D. O., Coulbourne, W., Graettinger, A. J., Pei, S., Gupta, R., and Grau, D. (2011b). “The Joplin tornado of 2011—Damage survey and case for tornado resilient codes.” ASCE, 1–55.
Ramsdell, J. V., Brown, L. A., and Harvey, R. B. (2005). “Tornado climatology of the contiguous United States.”, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rev. 1, Lisle, IL.
Reed, T. D., Rosowsky, D. V., and Schiff, S. D. (1997). “Uplift capacity of light-frame rafter to top plate connections.” J. Archit. Eng., 156–163.
Reinhold, T. A., and Ellingwood, B. (1982). “Tornado damage risk assessment.”, RD—Center for Building Technology, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
Rosowsky, D. V., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2002). “Performance-based engineering of wood frame housing: Fragility analysis methodology.” J. Struct. Eng., 32–38.
Roueche, D. B., and Prevatt, D. O. (2013). “Residential damage patterns following the 2011 Tuscaloosa, AL, and Joplin, MO tornadoes.” J. Disaster Res., 8(6), 1061–1067.
Schaefer, J. T., Kelly, D. L., and Abbey, R. F. (1986). “A minimum assumption tornado-hazard probability model.” J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 25(12), 1934–1945.
Shanmugam, B., Nielson, B. G., and Prevatt, D. O. (2008). “Probabilistic descriptions of in situ roof to top plate connections in light frame wood structures.” ASCE—Structures Congress, Reston, VA.
Standohar-Alfano, C. D., and van de Lindt, J. W. (2014). “An empirically-based probabilistic tornado hazard analysis of the U.S. using 1973–2011 data.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 04014013.
Storm Prediction Center. (2011). “Severe weather database files.”
Twisdale, L. A., and Dunn, W. L. (1981). “Tornado missile simulation and design methodology.”, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
van de Lindt, J. W., et al. (2013). “Dual-objective-based tornado design philosophy.” J. Struct. Eng., 251–263.
van de Lindt, J. W., Amini, M. O., Standohar-Alfano, C., and Dao, T. (2012). “Systematic study of the failure of a light-frame wood roof in a tornado.” Buildings, 2(4), 519–533.
Wind Science and Engineering Research Center. (2006). “A recommendation for an enhanced Fujita scale.” 111 〈http://www.depts.ttu.edu/weweb/efscale.pdf〉 (Sep. 1, 2011).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142Issue 1January 2016

History

Received: Jul 11, 2014
Accepted: May 8, 2015
Published online: Jul 7, 2015
Discussion open until: Dec 7, 2015
Published in print: Jan 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christine D. Standohar-Alfano, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Student, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372.
John W. van de Lindt, F.ASCE [email protected]
George T. Abell Distinguished Professor in Infrastructure, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1372 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share