Technical Papers
Aug 14, 2014

Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Engineering Demands

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 7

Abstract

Two geotechnical centrifuge tests were designed to elicit the influence of soil–foundation–structure interaction (SFSI) and structure–soil–structure interaction (SSSI) effects on the seismic demands of an inelastic frame structure founded on individual spread footings. Four experimental cases were considered: (1) SFSI of an individual inelastic frame structure (baseline case); (2) in-plane SSSI between the frame structure and a large elastic wall structure designed to respond predominately in a rocking mode; (3) anti-plane SSSI between the frame and wall structures; and (4) combined in-plane and anti-plane SSSI between the frame structure and two wall structures. Results from Cases 1, 2, and 4 are analyzed considering 13 demand parameters. The peak seismic demands from the baseline case are compared to the peak demands from the SSSI cases to elicit the impacts of building adjacency. The number of earthquake motions that resulted in increases or decreases in the seismic demands in the frame structure are tracked for the SSSI cases. For these tests, SSSI consistently results in increased peak foundation moment and foundation base shear demands, regardless of the geometric layout of the structures. These increases propagate throughout the superstructure, resulting in increases in moment, shear and curvature ductility demands in the structural components. SSSI effects are observed to be most significant for low–to–moderate intensity earthquake motions, suggesting that particular consideration should be given to the likelihood of SSSI for highly probable earthquakes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. CMMI-0830331. Opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. Experiments were conducted at the Center for Geotechnical Modeling at UCD, which is supported by the NEES program under Award No. CMMI-0402490. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the UCD staff. We would also like to acknowledge the assistance of the principal investigators and other researchers involved with this research grant who are not listed in the authorship: C. Bolisetti, Z. Chen, G. Fiegel, A. Whittaker, K. Jones, S. Gille, J. Lund, P. Bassal, J. Tran, and R. Reitherman. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the contributions of our professional practice committee: M. Lew, M. Moore, F. Naeim, F. Ostadan, P. Somerville, and M. Willford.

References

Bolisetti, C., and Whittaker, A. (2011). “Seismic structure–soil–structure interaction in nuclear power plant structures.” Transactions, SMiRT 21, Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY.
Campbell, D., Cheney, J., and Kutter, B. (1991). “Boundary effects in dynamic centrifuge model tests.” Centrifuge 91, H.-Y. Ko and F. G. McLean, ed., A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 441–448.
Çelebi, M. (1993a). “Seismic responses of two adjacent buildings: Data and analyses.” J. Struct. Eng., 2461–2476.
Çelebi, M. (1993b). “Seismic responses of two adjacent buildings: Interaction.” J. Struct. Eng., 2477–2492.
Chang, B., Raychowdhury, P., Hutchinson, T., Thomas, J., Gajan, S., and Kutter, B. (2007). “Evaluation of the seismic performance of combined frame-wall-foundation structural systems through centrifuge testing.” 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (ICEGE), Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Deng, L., and Kutter, B. (2012). “Characterization of rocking shallow foundations using centrifuge model tests.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(5), 1043–1060.
FEMA. (2000). “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2005). “Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedure.”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
Garnier, J., et al. (2007). “Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modeling.” Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech., 3, 1–23.
Gazetas, G. (1991). “Foundations vibrations.” Chapter 14, Foundation Engineering Handbook, 2nd Ed., H.-Y. Fang, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
Ghergu, M., and Ionescu, I. (2009). “Structure–soil–structure coupling in seismic excitation and “city effect”.” Int. J. Eng. Sci., 47(3), 342–354.
Kitada, Y., Hirotani, T., and Iguchi, M. (1999). “Models test on dynamic structure–structure interaction of nuclear power plant buildings.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 192(2–3), 205–216.
Kutter, B. (1995). “Recent advances in centrifuge modeling of seismic shaking.” 3rd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, S. Prakash, ed., Vol. III, Univ. of Missouri, Rolla, MO.
Lee, T., and Wesley, D. (1973). “Soil-structure interaction of nuclear reactor structures considering through-soil coupling between adjacent structures.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 24(3), 374–387.
Liu, W., Hutchinson, T., Kutter, B., Hakhamaneshi, M., Aschheim, M., and Kunnath, S. (2013). “Demonstration of compatible yielding between soil-foundation and superstructure components.” J. Struct. Eng., 1408–1420.
Lou, M., Wang, H., Chen, X., and Zhai, Y. (2011). “Structure–soil–structure interaction: Literature review.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 31(12), 1724–1731.
Luco, J., and Contesse, L. (1973). “Dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 63(4), 1289–1303.
Mason, H., et al. (2011). “Seismic performance assessment in dense urban environments: Centrifuge data report for HBM04.”, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Mason, H., Bray, J., Kutter, B., Wilson, D., and Choy, B. (2010). “Earthquake motion selection and calibration for use in a geotechnical centrifuge.” 7th Int. Conf. on Physical Modeling in Geotechnics, S. Springman, J. Laue, and L. Seward, eds., CRC Press, Leiden, Netherlands, 361–366.
Mason, H., Trombetta, N., Chen, Z., Bray, J., Hutchinson, T., and Kutter, B. (2013). “Seismic soil–foundation–structure interaction observed in geotechnical centrifuge experiments.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 48, 162–174.
Mizuno, H. (1980). “Effects of structure–soil–structure interaction during various excitations.” 7th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
Mulliken, J., and Karabalis, D. (1998). “Discrete model for dynamic through-the-soil coupling of 3-D foundations and structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(7), 687–710.
Mylonakis, G., Syngros, C., Gazetas, G., and Tazoh, T. (2006). “The role of soil in the collapse of 18 piers of hansin expressway in the kobe earthquake.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(5), 547–575.
Nakagawa, S., et al. (1998). “Forced vibration tests and simulation analyses of a nuclear reactor building.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 179(2), 145–156.
Padrón, L., Aznárez, J., and Maeso, O. (2009). “Dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction between nearby piled buildings under seismic excitation by bem-fem model.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 29(6), 1084–1096.
Schofield, A. (1980). “Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations.” Geotechnique, 30(3), 227–268.
Trifunac, M. (1972). “Interaction of a shear wall with the soil for incident plane sh waves.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 62(1), 63–83.
Trombetta, N., et al. (2011). “Seismic performance assessment in dense urban environments: Centrifuge data report for NWT01.”, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Trombetta, N. (2013). “Seismic soil–foundation–structure interaction in urban environments.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, San Diego.
Trombetta, N., Mason, H., Chen, Z., Hutchinson, T., Bray, J., and Kutter, B. (2013a). “Nonlinear dynamic foundation and frame structure response observed in geotechnical centrifuge experiments.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 50, 117–133.
Trombetta, N., Mason, H., Hutchinson, T., Zupan, J., Bray, J., and Kutter, B. (2013b). “Nonlinear soil–foundation–structure and structure–soil–structure interaction: Centrifuge observations.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 140(5), 04013057-1–04013057-11.
Wong, H., and Trifunac, M. (1975). “Two-dimensional, antiplane, building-soil-building interaction for two or more buildings and for incident plane sh waves.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 65(6), 1863–1885.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141Issue 7July 2015

History

Received: Jul 17, 2013
Accepted: May 30, 2014
Published online: Aug 14, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 14, 2015
Published in print: Jul 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nicholas W. Trombetta, M.ASCE
Structural Designer, KL&A, Inc., Structural Engineers and Builders, Golden, CO 80401.
H. Benjamin Mason, A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering; Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331.
Tara C. Hutchinson, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0085 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Joshua D. Zupan, M.ASCE
Engineer, HDR, Inc., Oakland, CA 94607-4007; formerly, Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710.
Jonathan D. Bray, F.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710.
Bruce L. Kutter, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share