Technical Papers
Apr 1, 2013

Normal Strain-Adjusted Shear Strength Expression for Fully Grouted Reinforced Masonry Structural Walls

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 3

Abstract

Since the conclusion of the test programs carried out by the Joint U.S.–Japan Technical Coordinating Committee on Masonry Research (TCCMAR) during the 1970s and 1980s, there has been little progress made to enhance the shear strength expressions used for masonry design. The experimentally-derived expressions currently employed by North American design codes are based on the 45° cracked member assumption and truss analogy, where shear strength is expressed as an algebraic summation of resistance offered by masonry, axial load, and shear reinforcement. By contrast, the modified compression field theory (MCFT), which has gained a wide acceptance within the concrete design community, demonstrates that the 45° cracked member assumption can be overly conservative. Yet the MCFT or similar equilibrium-based approaches have often been thought of as incompatible with masonry due to the latter’s complex anisotropic behavior. However, seismic design detailing requirements within North America typically require the highly-susceptible plastic hinge region of structural (shear) walls to contain vertical and horizontal steel reinforcement in fully grouted concrete block units. Under these circumstances, the anisotropic effects are greatly reduced and the development of a simplified approach to estimate the equilibrium conditions at the shear-critical zone of masonry structural walls is possible. Tests on masonry panels conducted at McMaster University in Canada are used with existing literature to define a set of constitutive relationships for cracked masonry subject to stress states that are typical in reinforced masonry structural walls. Subsequently, a methodology is proposed to accurately estimate the angle of inclination of shear cracking and the shear resistance offered by the horizontal reinforcement and the masonry compression strut accounting for aggregate interlock effects. The proposed normal strain-adjusted shear strength expression (NSSSE) was found to predict the shear strength of 57 wall tests reported in literature with a mean ratio of experimental to theoretical strengths of VExperimental/VTheory=1.16 (C.O.V.=11.4%) and a 95% percentile of VExperimental/VTheory=0.98.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Financial support has been provided by the McMaster University Centre for Effective Design of Structures (CEDS) funded through the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund (ORDCF) as well as the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. The continuous support of the McMaster Masonry Research Group (MMRG) by the Ontario Masonry Contractors Association (OMCA), the Canada Masonry Design Centre (CMDC), and the Canadian Concrete Masonry Producers Association (CCMPA) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Anderson, D. L., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). “In-plane shear strength of masonry walls.” Proc., 6th Canadian Masonry Symp., University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 223–234.
Attkinson, R. H., and Hammons, M. I. (1997). “Tension stiffening behavior of reinforced masonry.” J. Struct. Eng., 597–603.
Bentz, E. C., Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P. (2006). “Simplified modified compression field theory for calculating shear strength of reinforced concrete elements.” ACI Struct. J., 103(4), 614–624.
Collins, M P., and Mitchell, D. (1991). Prestressed concrete structures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
CSA. (2004a). “Design of masonry structures.” CSA S304.1-04 (R2010), Mississauga, Canada.
CSA. (2004b). “Design of concrete structures.” CSA A23.3-04 (R2010), Mississauga, Canada.
CSA. (2004c). “Mortar and grout for unit masonry.” CSA A179-04 (R2010), Mississauga, Canada.
CSA. (2009). “Concrete materials and methods of concrete construction/Test methods and standard practices for concrete.” CSA A23.1-09, Mississauga, Canada.
Davis, C. L. (2008). “Evaluation of design provisions for in-plane shear in masonry walls.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA.
Drysdale, R. G., and Khattab, M. M. (1995). “In-plane behavior of grouted concrete masonry under biaxial tension-compression.” ACI Struct. J., 92(6), 1–13.
Drysdale, R. G., and Hamid, A. A. (2005). Masonry structures behaviour and design, Canada Masonry Design Centre, Mississauga, Canada.
El-Dakhakhni, W., Banting, B., and Miller, S. (2013). “Seismic performance parameter quantification of shear-critical reinforced concrete masonry squat walls.” J. Struct. Eng., 139(6), 957–973.
El-Dakhakhni, W. W., Drysdale, R. G., and Khattab, M. M. (2006). “Multilaminate macromodel for concrete masonry: formulation and verification.” J. Struct. Eng., 1984–1996.
Fattal, S. G., and Todd, D. R. (1991). “Ultimate strength of masonry shear walls: Prediction vs. test results.”, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Gaithersburg, MD.
Hamid, A. A., and Drysdale, R. G. (1980). “Concrete masonry under combined shear and compression along the mortar joints.” ACI Struct. J., 77(5), 314–320.
Ibrahim, K. S., and Suter, G. T. (1999). “Ductility of concrete masonry shear walls subjected to cyclic loading.” Proc., 8th North American Masonry Conf., The Masonry Society, Boulder, CO, Paper 3.04-2.
Khattab, M. M. S. (1993). “In-plane behaviour of grouted concrete masonry under biaxial states of stress.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Liu, L., Tang, T., and Zhai, X. (2006). “Failure criteria for grouted concrete block masonry under biaxial compression.” Adv. Struct. Eng., 9(2), 229–239.
Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC). (2011). “Building code requirements for masonry structures.” TMS 402/ASCE 5/ACI 530, New York.
Matsumura, A. (1987). “Shear strength of reinforced hollow unit masonry walls.” Proc., 4th North America Masonry Conf., University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 50-1–50-16.
Matsumura, A. (1988a). “Shear strength of reinforced masonry walls.” Proc., 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Science Council of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, Vol. 7, 121–126.
Matsumura, A. (1988b). “Effectiveness of shear reinforcement in fully grouted hollow clay masonry walls.” 4th Meeting of the U.S.-Japan Joint Technical Coordinating Committee on Masonry Research, Atkinson-Noland and Associates, Boulder, CO, 1–10.
Okamoto, S., Yamazaki, Y., Kaminosono, T., Teshigawara, M., and Hirashi, H. (1987). “Seismic capacity of reinforced masonry walls and beams.” Proc., 18th Joint Meeting of the U.S.-Japan Cooperative Program in Natural Resource Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects: NBSIR 87-3540, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 307–319.
Priestley, N. M. J., Verma, R., and Xiao, Y. (1994). “Seismic shear strength of reinforced concrete columns.” J. Struct. Eng., 2310–2329.
Sarhat, S. R., and Sherwood, T. G. (2011). “Shear design of reinforced masonry beams.” Proc., 11th North American Masonry Conf., The Masonry Society, Boulder, CO, Paper 3.04-2.
Shing, P. B., Noland, J. L., Spaech, H., Klamerus, E., and Schuller, M. (1991). “Response of single-storey reinforced masonry shear walls to in-plane lateral loads.”, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Shing, P. B., Schuller, M., and Hoskere, V. S. (1990). “In-plane resistance of reinforced masonry shear walls.” J. Struct. Eng., 619–640.
Standards Association of New Zealand (SANZ). (2004). “Design of reinforced concrete masonry structures.” New Zealand Standards Association (NZS) 4230:2004, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sveinsson, B. I., McNiven, H. D., and Sucuoglu, H. (1985). “Cyclic loading tests of masonry piers—Volume 4: Additional tests with height to width ratio of 1.”, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Tikalsky, P. J., Atkinson, R. H., and Hammons, M. I. (1995). “Compressive strength of reinforced masonry under lateral tension.” J. Struct. Eng., 283–289.
Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P. (1982). “The response of reinforced concrete to in-plane shear and normal stresses.” Publication No. 82-03, Depart. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P. (1986). “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI Struct. J., 83(2), 219–231.
Voon, K. C., and Ingham, J. M. (2006). “Experimental in-plane shear strength investigation of reinforced concrete masonry walls.” J. Struct. Eng., 400–408.
Voon, K. C., and Ingham, J. M. (2007). “Design expression for the in-plane shear strength of reinforced concrete masonry.” J. Struct. Eng., 706–713.
Walraven, J. C. (1981). “Fundamental analysis of aggregate interlock.” J. Struct. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 107(11), 2245–2270.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 140Issue 3March 2014

History

Received: Apr 15, 2012
Accepted: Mar 25, 2013
Published online: Apr 1, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 13, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bennett R. Banting [email protected]
S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8. E-mail: [email protected]
Wael W. El-Dakhakhni [email protected]
M.ASCE
Martini, Mascarin and George Chair in Masonry Design, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share