Technical Papers
Jan 16, 2013

Probabilistic Nonlinear Response Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper employs a methodology for probabilistic response analysis based on the first-order second moment (FOSM) method in conjunction with response sensitivity computation through the direct differentiation method (DDM), to study the variability of the structural response of steel-concrete composite (SCC) beams. This methodology is applied to compute the first-order and second-order statistical moments of the response of two actual structural systems for which experimental data are available. The results of the DDM-based FOSM method are compared with the experimental measurements and with the results of the computationally more expensive Monte Carlo-Simulation (MCS) method. Different modeling hypotheses for the material parameter uncertainty are considered. The DDM-based FOSM method agrees very well with the MCS results for low-to-moderate levels of response nonlinearity under low-to-moderate material parameter uncertainty and up to high level of response nonlinearity under low material parameter uncertainty. The DDM-based FOSM method is shown to correctly describe the effects of random spatial variability of material parameters.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Partial supports of this research by (1) the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMS-0010112; (2) the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center’s Transportation Systems Research Program under Award No. 00006493; and (3) the Louisiana Board of Regents through the Pilot Funding for New Research (Pfund) Program of the National Science Foundation Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) under Award No. NSF(2008)-PFUND-86, are gratefully acknowledged. The writers wish to thank Professor Peter Ansourian of The University of Sydney, for providing unpublished data from his experimental tests on simply supported beams. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring agencies.

References

Amadio, C. (2008). “Probabilistic analysis of a partially-restrained steel-concrete composite frame.” Steel Compos. Struct., 8(1), 35–52.
An, L., and Cederwall, K. (1996). “Push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 36(1), 15–29.
Ang, A. H.-S., and Tang, W.-H. (1975). “Probability concepts in engineering planning and design.” Basic principles of professional computing series, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York.
Ansourian, P. (1981). “Experiments on continuous composite beams.” Proc- Inst. Civ. Eng. Part 2, 71(12), 25–51.
Ansourian, P. (1982). “Plastic rotation of composite beams.” J. Struct. Div., 108(3), 643–659.
Ayoub, A., and Filippou, F. (2000). “Mixed formulation of nonlinear steel-concrete composite beam element.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(3), 371–381.
Balan, T. A., Spacone, E., and Kwon, M. (2001). “A 3D hypoplastic model for cyclic analysis of concrete structures.” Eng. Struct., 23(4), 333–342.
Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2006). “Finite element structural response sensitivity and reliability analyses using smooth versus non-smooth material constitutive models.” Int. J. Reliab. Saf., 1(1–2), 3–39.
Barbato, M., Gu, Q., and Conte, J. P. (2010). “Probabilistic pushover analysis of structural and soil-structure systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 136(11), 1330–1341.
Barbato, M., Zona, A., and Conte, J. P. (2007). “Finite element response sensitivity analysis using three-field mixed formulation: General theory and application to frame structures.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 69(1), 114–161.
Bazant, Z. P., and Liu, K. L. (1985). “Random creep and shrinkage in structures: Sampling.” J. Struct. Eng., 111(5), 1113–1134.
Bruneau, M., Uang, C.-M., and Whittaker, A. S. (1998). Ductile design of steel structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bursi, O. S., and Gramola, G. (1999). “Behaviour of headed stud shear connectors under low-cycle high amplitude displacements.” Mater. Struct., 32(4), 290–297.
Cas, B., Bratina, S., Saje, M., and Planinc, I. (2004). “Non-linear analysis of composite steel-concrete beams with incomplete interaction.” Steel Compos. Struct., 4(6), 489–507.
Civjan, S. A., and Singh, P. (2003). “Behavior of shear studs subjected to fully reversed cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Eng., 129(11), 1466–1474.
Conte, J. P., Barbato, M., and Spacone, E. (2004). “Finite element response sensitivity analysis using force-based frame models.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 59(13), 1781–1820.
Conte, J. P., Vijalapura, P. K., and Meghella, M. (2003). “Consistent finite-element response sensitivity analysis.” J. Eng. Mech., 129(12), 1380–1393.
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2002). “Non-linear analysis of composite beams by a displacement approach.” Comput. Struct., 80(27–30), 2217–2228.
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2004a). “Comparison and validation of displacement and mixed elements for the nonlinear analysis of continuous composite beams.” Comput. Struct., 82(23–26), 2117–2130.
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2004b). “Slip locking in finite elements for composite beams with deformable shear connection.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 40(13–14), 1907–1930.
Dall’Asta, A., and Zona, A. (2004c). “Three-field mixed formulation for the non-linear analysis of composite beams with deformable shear connection.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 40(4), 425–448.
Der Kiureghian, A., and Ke, B. J. (1988). “The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 3(2), 83–91.
Ditlevsen, O., and Madsen, H. O. (1996). Structural reliability methods, Wiley, New York.
Filippou, F. C., and Constantinides, M. (2004). “FEDEASLab getting started guide and simulation examples.”, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Franchin, P. (2004). “Reliability of uncertain inelastic structures under earthquake excitation.” J. Eng. Mech., 130(2), 180–191.
Galambos, T. V. (2000). “Recent research and design developments in steel and composite steel-concrete structures in USA.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 55(1–3), 289–303.
Gattesco, N., and Giuriani, E. (1996). “Experimental study on stud shear connectors subjected to cyclic loading.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 38(1), 1–21.
Gattesco, N., Giuriani, E., and Gubana, A. (1997). “Low-cycle fatigue test on stud shear connectors.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(2), 145–150.
Ghanem, R., and Spanos, P. D. (1991). Stochastic finite elements: A spectral approach, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Grigoriu, M. (2000). “Stochastic mechanics.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 37(1–2), 197–214.
Haukaas, T., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2005). “Parameter sensitivity and importance measures in nonlinear finite element reliability analysis.” J. Eng. Mech., 131(10), 1013–1026.
Katafygiotis, L. S., and Beck, J. L. (1995). “A very efficient moment calculation method for uncertain linear dynamic systems.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 10(2), 117–128.
Kleiber, M., Antunez, H., Hien, T. D., and Kowalczyk, P. (1997). Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics: Theory and finite element computation, Wiley, New York.
Lam, D., and El-Lobody, E. (2005). “Behavior of headed stud shear connectors in composite beam.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(1), 96–107.
Lawrence, M. A. (1987). “Basis random variables in finite element analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 24(10), 1849–1863.
Lee, T.-H., and Mosalam, K. M. (2005). “Seismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear-wall building using FOSM method.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(14), 1719–1736.
Liu, J. S. (2001). Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Madsen, H. O., and Bazant, Z. P. (1983). “Uncertainty analysis of creep and shrinkage effects in concrete structures.” ACI J., 80(2), 116–127.
MathWorks, Inc. (1997). Matlab—High performance numeric computation and visualization software, user’s guide, The MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Mazzolani, F. M. (2003). “Steel and composite structures in European seismic areas: Research, codification, design, and applications.” Earthquake Spectra, 19(2), 415–452.
Melchers, R. E. (1999). Structural reliability analysis and predictions, 2nd Ed., Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Menegotto, M., and Pinto, P. E. (1973). “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and nonelastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending.” Proc., IABSE Symp. on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, Int. Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, 112–123.
Mirza, S. A., and MacGregor, J. G. (1979). “Variability of mechanical properties of reinforcing bars.” J. Struct. Div., 105(5), 921–937.
Mirza, S. A., MacGregor, J. G., and Hatzinikolas, M. (1979). “Statistical descriptions of strength of concrete.” J. Struct. Div., 105(6), 1021–1037.
Newmark, N. M., Siess, C. P., and Viest, I. M. (1951). “Tests and analysis of composite beams with incomplete interaction.” Proc. Soc. Exp. Stress Anal., 9(1), 75–92.
Noh, H. C. (2004). “A formulation for stochastic finite element analysis of plate structures with uncertain Poisson’s ratio.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 193(45–47), 4857–4873.
Oehlers, D. J., and Bradford, M. A. (1999). Elementary behaviour of composite steel and concrete structural members, Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
Oehlers, D. J., and Johnson, R. P. (1987). “The strength of stud shear connections in composite beams.” Struct. Eng., 65(2), 44–48.
Ollgaard, J. G., Slutter, R. G., and Fisher, J. W. (1971). “Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal weight concrete.” AISC Eng. J., 2Q, 55–64.
Salari, M. R., and Spacone, E. (2001). “Analysis of steel-concrete composite frames with bond-slip.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(11), 1243–1250.
Schueller, G. I. (2001). “Computational stochastic mechanics–recent advances.” Comput. Struct., 79(22–25), 2225–2234.
Simões da Silva, L., Rebelo, C., Nethercot, D., Marques, L., Simoes, R., and Vila Real, P. M. M. (2009). “Statistical evaluation of the lateral-torsional buckling resistance of steel I-beams, Part 2: Variability of steel properties.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(4), 832–849.
Soize, C. (1995). “Stochastic linearization method with random parameters for SDOF nonlinear dynamical systems: Prediction and identification procedures.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 10(3), 143–152.
Spacone, E., and El-Tawil, S. (2004). “Nonlinear analysis of steel-concrete composite structures: State-of-the-art.” J. Struct. Eng., 130(2), 159–168.
Stefanou, G. (2009). “The stochastic finite element method: Past, present and future.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 198(9–12), 1031–1051.
To, C. W. S. (2001). “On computational stochastic structural dynamics applying finite elements.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 8(1), 3–40.
Ubejd Mujagi¢, J. R., and Easterling, W. S. (2009). “Reliability assessment of composite beams.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(12), 2111–2128.
Vidal, C. A., Lee, H.-S., and Haber, R. B. (1991). “The consistent tangent operator for design sensitivity analysis of history-dependent response.” Comput. Syst. Eng., 2(5–6), 509–523.
Viest, I. M., Colaco, J. P., Furlong, R. W., Griffs, L. G., Leon, R. T., and Wyllie, L. A. (1997). Composite construction design for buildings, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wong, F. S. (1985). “First-order, second-moment methods.” Comput. Struct., 20(4), 779–791.
Xue, W., Ding, M., Wang, H., and Luo, Z. (2008). “Static behavior and theoretical model of stud shear connectors.” J. Bridge Eng., 13(6), 623–634.
Zhang, Y., and Der Kiureghian, A. (1993). “Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 108(1–2), 23–36.
Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2005). “Finite element response sensitivity analysis of steel-concrete composite beams with deformable shear connection.” J. Eng. Mech., 131(11), 1126–1139.
Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2006). “Finite element response sensitivity analysis of continuous steel-concrete composite girders.” Steel Compos. Struct., 6(3), 183–202.
Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2008). “Nonlinear seismic response analysis of steel-concrete composite frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(6), 986–997.
Zona, A., Barbato, M., Dall’Asta, A., and Dezi, L. (2010). “Probabilistic analysis for design assessment of continuous steel-concrete composite girders.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(7), 897–905.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 140Issue 1January 2014

History

Received: Jan 18, 2012
Accepted: Jan 14, 2013
Published online: Jan 16, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Feb 23, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michele Barbato [email protected]
A.M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ. at Baton Rouge, 3418H Patrick F. Taylor Hall, Nicholson Extension, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803. E-mail: [email protected]
Alessandro Zona [email protected]
A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, School of Architecture and Design, Univ. of Camerino, Viale della Rimembranza, 63100 Ascoli Piceno, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Joel P. Conte [email protected]
M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0085 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share