Technical Papers
Aug 10, 2012

Risk-Based Approach for Optimum Maintenance of Bridges under Traffic and Earthquake Loads

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 3

Abstract

Structures deteriorate as a result of material aging, aggressive environmental conditions, and increasing loads. During their lifetime, structures are also possibly exposed to some extreme events. The associated consequences of failure caused by progressive deterioration or extreme events can be devastating. Therefore, risk assessment and risk mitigation are necessary to keep structural performance within tolerable levels. This paper proposes an approach for assessing the time-dependent risks caused by traffic and earthquake loads and establishing the optimal preventive and essential maintenance strategies of bridges. The efficiency of the proposed approach is demonstrated using a highway bridge. Socioeconomic and environmental losses are investigated in a consequence-based framework. The vulnerability analysis under traffic loads is performed using time-dependent deterioration and traffic load models. The time-dependent failure probability for given earthquake loads is computed by comparing displacement ductility capacity and demand obtained via nonlinear dynamic analysis. The risks from 196 earthquake scenarios associated with four magnitudes and 49 earthquake strike locations are compared, and the highest one is selected as representative of the seismic risk. Based on the available maintenance options and the associated costs, the optimal lifetime essential/preventive maintenance strategies for total risk mitigation are developed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Support from (1) the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CMS-0639428), (2) the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (Cooperative Agreement Award No. DTFH61-07-H-00040), and (3) the U.S. Office of Naval Research (Contract No. N00014-08-1-0188) is gratefully acknowledged. The opinions and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations.

References

AASHTO. (1992). Standard specifications for highway bridges, 14th Ed., Washington, DC.
Akiyama, M., Frangopol, D. M., and Matsuzaki, H. (2011). “Life-cycle reliability of RC bridge piers under seismic and airborne chloride hazards.” Earthqu. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(15), 1671–1687.
Albrecht, P., and Naeemi, A. H. (1984). “Performance of weathering steel in bridges.” NCHRP Rep. 272, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Almusallam, A. A., Khan, F. M., Dulaijan, S. U., and Al-Amoudi, O. S. B. (2003). “Effectiveness of surface coatings in improving concrete durability.” Cement Concr. Compos., 25(4–5), 473–481.
Balendra, T., Tan, K., and Kong, S. (1999). “Vulnerability of reinforced concrete frames in low seismic region when designed according to BS 8110.” Earthqu. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(11), 1361–1381.
Bocchini, P., and Frangopol, D.M. (2012). “Bridge network performance, maintenance, and optimization under uncertainty: accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infra. Eng., 8(4), 341–356.
Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). (1997). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Part 1: Provisions, FEMA, Washington, DC, 290, 302.
Colorado State Patrol. (2011). Colorado driver handbook, Denver, CO.
Decò A., and Frangopol, D. M. (2011). “Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards.” J. Risk Res., 14(9), 1057–1089.
Decò, A., and Frangopol, D.M. (2013). “Life-cycle risk assessment of spatially distributed aging bridges under seismic and traffic hazards.” Earthqu. Spectra, 29(1), 1–27.
Ellingwood, B. R. (2001). “Acceptable risk bases for design of structures.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 3(2), 170–179.
Ellingwood, B. R. (2005). “Risk-informed condition assessment of civil infrastructure: State of practice and research issues.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 1(1), 7–18.
Estes, A. C. (1997). “A system reliability approach to the lifetime optimization of inspection and repair of highway bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Estes, A. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (1998). “RELSYS: A computer program for structural system reliability.” Struct. Eng. Mech., 6(8), 901–999.
Fault Activity Map of California. (2010). Geologic data map no. 6: California geological survey, Department of Conservation, Sacramento, CA.
Florida Department of Transportation. (2011). “Bridge costs.” Transportation Costs Rep, Tallahassee, FL.
Frangopol, D. M. (2011). “Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 7(6), 389–413.
Frangopol, D. M., Lin, K.-Y., and Estes, A. C. (1997). “Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(10), 286–297.
Ghosh, J. and Padgett, J. E. (2010). “Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves.” J. Struct. Eng., 136(12), 1497–1511.
Handfelt, L. D., Wong, I., and Kavanagh, N. (2011). “Seismic hazard evaluation for design of San Vicente dam raise.” 21st Century Dam Design–Advances and Adaptations, 31st Annual USSD Conf., U.S. Society on Dams, Denver.
Hessami, A. G. (1999). “Risk management: A systems paradigm.” Syst. Eng., 2(3), 156–167.
Kececioglu, D. (1995). Maintainability, availability, & operational readiness engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Kong, J. S., and Frangopol, D. M. (2003). “Life-cycle reliability-based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 129(6), 818–828.
Liu, M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2005). “Multi-objective maintenance planning optimization for deteriorating bridges considering condition, safety, and life-cycle cost.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(5), 833–842.
MathWorks 7.9 [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Matsumoto, M., Shiraishi, N., Rungthongbaisuree, S., and Kikuta, T. (1989). “Corrosion of steel bridges: Its long-term prediction and effect on the safety.” Struct. Eng. Earthquake Eng., 6(2), 229–237.
Minitab 16.0 [Computer software]. State College, PA, Minitab, Inc.
Naito, H., Akiyama, M., and Suzuki, M. (2011). “Ductility evaluation of concrete-encased steel bridge piers subjected to lateral cyclic loading.” J. Bridge Eng., 16(1), 72–81.
Okasha, N. M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2010). “Novel approach for multi-criteria optimization of life-cycle preventive and essential maintenance of deteriorating structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 136(8), 1009–1022.
OpenSees 2.2.2 [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Pederson, P. T. (2002). “Collision risk for fixed offshore structures close to high-density shipping lanes.” Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: J. Struct. Eng. Mar. Environ., 216(1), 29–44.
Priestley, N. M. J., Seible, F., and Calvi, M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges, Wiley, New York.
Rackwitz, R. (2002). “Optimization and risk acceptability based on the life quality index.” Struct. Saf., 24(2–4), 297–331.
Seo, J.-W., and Linzell, D. G. (2010). “Probabilistic vulnerability scenarios for horizontally curved, steel, I-Girder bridges under earthquake loads.” Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board, 3(2202), 206–211.
Stein, S. M., Young, G. K., Trent, R. E., and Pearson, D. R. (1999). “Prioritizing scour vulnerable bridges using risk.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 5(3), 95–101.
USGS. (2009a). Earthquake hazards program, Department of the Interior, USGS, Reston, VA.
USGS. (2009b). Earthquake probability mapping, Department of the Interior, USGS, Reston, VA.
Wen, Y. K., and Song, S. H. (2003). “Structural reliability/redundancy under earthquakes.” J. Struct. Eng., 129(1), 56–67.
Wilson, J. and Holmes, K. (2007). “Seismic vulnerability and mitigation during construction of cable-stayed bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 12(3), 364–372.
Yang, S. I., Frangopol, D. M., and Neves, L. C. (2006). “Optimum maintenance strategy for deteriorating structures based on lifetime functions.” Eng. Struct., 28(2), 196–206.
Yamamoto, Y. (2011). “Stochastic model for earthquake ground motion using wavelet packets.“ Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Zhu, B., and Frangopol, D. M. (2012). “Reliability, redundancy and risk as performance indicators of structural systems during their life-cycle.” Eng. Struct., 41, 34–49.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 139Issue 3March 2013
Pages: 422 - 434

History

Received: Sep 5, 2011
Accepted: Jun 5, 2012
Published online: Aug 10, 2012
Published in print: Mar 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Benjin Zhu, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems Engineering Research Center, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA 18015-4729. E-mail: [email protected]
Dan M. Frangopol, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and the Fazlur R. Khan Endowed Chair of Structural Engineering and Architecture, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems Engineering Research Center, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA 18015-4729 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share