Technical Papers
Feb 1, 2012

Force- and Displacement-Based Seismic Performance Parameters for Reinforced Masonry Structural Walls with Boundary Elements

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 12

Abstract

There is a need to evaluate existing, and introduce new, masonry construction techniques within a performance-based seismic design context to advance their adoption in the next generation of seismic design codes in North America. In this regard, a reinforced masonry (RM) structural wall system that incorporates confining boundary elements in the plastic hinge region presently lacks specific design requirements in the Masonry Standards Joint Committee and Canadian Standards Association S304.1 design codes. In addition, RM structural wall systems are omitted completely from the plan to develop a new performance-based seismic design methodology laid out by FEMA 445. This paper presents experimental results of four specially detailed RM structural walls subjected to fully reversed cycles of displacement-controlled loading as tested by the authors. In addition, the resulting analysis also includes one wall from a previous study for comparison purposes. All walls were detailed with lateral reinforcing ties confining a grouted core and four vertical reinforcement bars located at each of the wall ends. The design and detailing of the walls represented a range of parameters that would be anticipated to vary within low-to-medium-rise RM buildings. Each of the half-scale walls had overall dimensions of 1.8×4.0 m but varied by the level of applied axial load, the presence of interstory floor slabs, and the presence of confining boundary elements above the first-story height. The results of this experimental program indicate that boundary elements delayed the onset of buckling in the vertical reinforcement and reduced the impact of face-shell spalling on overall wall strength degradation. At 20% degradation from ultimate strength, the top drifts ranged from 1.82 to 3.73% and the displacement ductilities ranged from 6.6 to 15.2. This study is the first of a series of studies at McMaster University currently focused on introducing a broad set of experimental evidence aiming at establishing a new category of RM seismic force resisting systems in North American building codes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Financial support has been provided by the McMaster University Centre for Effective Design of Structures (CEDS) funded through the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund (ORDCF) as well as the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. The provision of mason time by the Ontario Masonry Contractors Association (OMCA) and Canada Masonry Design Centre is appreciated. The supply of half-scale blocks by the Canadian Concrete Masonry Producers Association (CCMPA) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2008). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI 318-08, Farmington Hills, MI.
ASTM. (2004). “Standard test method for Young’s modulus, tangent modulus, and chord modulus.” E111-04, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2007). “Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar.” C1437-07, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2009a). “Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement.” A615/A615M-09b, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2009b). “Standard test method for preconstruction and construction evaluation of mortars for plain and reinforced unit masonry.” C780-09, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010a). “Standard specification for grout for masonry.” C476-10, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010b). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C39/C39M-10, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010c). “Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms.” C1314-10, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011). “Standard test methods for sampling and testing concrete masonry units and related units.” C140-11, West Conshohocken, PA.
Berry, M. P., and Eberhard, M. O. (2005). “Practical performance model for bar buckling.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(7), 1060–1070.
Bresler, B., and Gilbert, P. H. (1961). “Tie requirements for reinforced concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J., 58(5), 555–570.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2004a). “Design of concrete structures.” CSA A23.3-04 (R2010), Mississauga, Canada.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2004b). “Design of masonry structures.” CSA S304.1-04 (R2010), Mississauga, Canada.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2004c). “Mortar and grout for unit masonry.” CSA A179-04 (R2010), Mississauga, Canada.
Chang, G. A., and Mander, J. B. (1994). “Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: Part I—Evaluation of seismic capacity.” Technical Rep. NCEER-94-0006, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Chopra, A. K. (2007). “Response to harmonic and periodic excitations.” Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 3rd Ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Dhanasekar, M., and Shrive, N. G. (2002). “Strength and deformation of confined and unconfined grouted masonry.” ACI Struct. J., 99(6), 819–826.
FEMA. (1998). “Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings.” FEMA 306, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2006). “Next generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: Program plan for new and existing buildings.” FEMA 445, Washington, DC.
Hart, G. C., Sajjad, N., Kingsley, G. R., and Noland, J. L. (1989). “Analytical stress-strain curves for grouted concrete masonry.” Masonry Soc. J., 8(1), T21–T34.
Long, L. M. (2006). “Behaviour of half-scale reinforced concrete masonry shear walls.” M.S. thesis, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Canada.
Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988). “Observed stress-strain behaviour of confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1827–1849.
Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC). (2008). “Building code requirements for masonry structures.” TMS 402/ASCE 5/ACI 530, New York.
Massone, L. M., and Wallace, J. W. (2004). “Load-deformation responses of slender reinforced concrete walls.” ACI Struct. J., 101(1), 103–113.
Moyer, M. J., and Kowalsky, M. J. (2003). “Influence of tension strain on buckling of reinforcement in concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J., 100(1), 75–85.
National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). (2010). “National Building Code of Canada 2010.” NBCC-05, Ottawa, Canada.
Pantazopoulou, S. J. (1998). “Detailing for reinforcement stability in RC members.” J. Struct. Eng., 124(6), 623–632.
Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1975). “Stress-strain relationships for concrete and steel.” Reinforced concrete structures, Wiley, New York.
Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). “Principles of member design.” Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, Wiley, New York, 139–142.
Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1993). “Stability of ductile shear walls.” ACI Struct. J., 90(4), 385–392.
Priestley, M. J. N., and Bridgeman, D. O. (1974). “Seismic resistance of brick masonry walls.” New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng. Bull., 7(4), 167–187.
Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M., and Kowalsky, M. J. (2007). Displacement-based seismic design of structures, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori (IUSS), Pavia, Italy.
Priestley, M. J. N., and Elder, D. M. (1982). “Seismic behaviour of slender concrete masonry shear walls.” Research Rep., Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Shedid, M. T., El-Dakhakhni, W. W., and Drysdale, R. G. (2010). “Alternative strategies to enhance the seismic performance of reinforced concrete block shear wall systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 136(6), 676–689.
Shing, P. B., Carter, E. W., and Noland, J. L. (1993). “Influence of confining steel on flexural response of reinforced masonry shear walls.” Masonry Soc. J., 11(2), T21–T34.
Shing, P. B., Schuller, M., and Hoskere, V. S. (1990). “In-plane resistance of reinforced masonry shear walls.” J. Struct. Eng., 116(3), 619–640.
Standing Committee on Earthquake Design (SCED). (2010). “Canadian commission on building and fire codes meeting agenda item summary sheet.” Activities and Work Plan Rep., National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 〈www.nationalcodes.ca/.../23.14.9a%20ED%20Report%20and%20request.pdf〉 (Jan. 2011).
Tomaževič, M. (1999). “Seismic resistance verification of structural walls.Earthquake-resistant design of masonry buildings, Imperial College Press, London, 127–141.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 138Issue 12December 2012
Pages: 1477 - 1491

History

Received: Jun 14, 2011
Accepted: Jan 30, 2012
Published online: Feb 1, 2012
Published in print: Dec 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bennett R. Banting, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada M8X 3A3 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Wael W. El-Dakhakhni, M.ASCE [email protected]
Martini, Mascarin and George Chair in Masonry Design, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada M8X 3A3. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share