Tensile Strength of Varied-Angle Mortise and Tenon Connections in Timber Frames
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 5
Abstract
The tensile strength of varied-angle mortise and tenon connections in timber frames is discussed in this paper. Twelve full-size mortise and tenon connections (four 90°, four 67.5°, and four 45°) were tested under monotonic tensile loading. Initial yield modes observed during testing included peg bending, peg shear, tenon tear out, and mortise splitting. Decreased connection angle corresponded to equal or increased tensile strength but decreased ductility. A theoretical method to calculate the tensile strength of mortise and tenon connections is also developed. The method uses a modified set of yield-limit equations supplemented with local-stress-effect (mortise splitting and row tear out) equations to predict tensile strength. The governing theoretical yield modes agree well with yield modes observed during testing. The theoretical tensile strength is reasonably accurate, averaging 14% higher to 9% lower compared with test results. The findings indicate that mortise and tenon connections are significantly stronger when the tenon is oriented radially with respect to the mortise grain, especially in orthogonal connections. As a consequence, tangential loading of the mortise should be avoided.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA). (1999). “General dowel equations for calculating lateral connection values.” Tech. Rep. No. 12, American Wood Council, Washington, DC.
American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA). (2005). National design specification (NDS) for wood construction 2005 Ed., American Wood Council, Washington, DC.
Aune, P., and Patton-Mallory, M. (1986). “Lateral load-bearing capacity of nailed joints based on the yield theory: Theoretical development.” Research Paper No. 469, Forest Products Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Madison, WI.
Breyer, D. E., Fridley, K. J., Cobeen, K. E., and Pollock, D. G. (2007). Design of wood structures ASD/LRFD, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bulleit, W. M., Sandberg, L. B., Drewek, M. W., and O’Bryant, T. L. (1999). “Behavior and modeling of wood-pegged timber frames.” J. Struct. Eng.JSENDH, 125(1), 3–9.
Bulleit, W. M., Sandberg, L. B., O’Bryant, T. L., Weaver, D. A., and Pattison, W. E. (1996). “Analysis of frames with traditional timber connections.” Proc., Int. Wood Eng. Conf., Vol. 4, Omnipress, Madison, WI, 232–239.
Burnett, D. T., Clouston, P., Damery, D. T., and Fisette, P. (2003). “Structural properties of pegged timber connections as affected by end distance.” For. Prod. J.FPJOAB, 53(2), 50–57.
Church, J. R., and Tew, B. W. (1997). “Characterization of bearing strength factors in pegged timber connections.” J. Struct. Eng.JSENDH, 123(3), 326–332.
Forest Products Laboratory (FPL). (1999). “Wood handbook—Wood as an engineering material.” Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service, Madison, WI.
Kelly, A., ed. (1990). Concise encyclopedia of composite materials, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Miller, J. F., Schmidt, R. J., and Bulleit, W. M. (2010). “New yield model for wood dowel connections.” J. Struct. Eng.JSENDH, 136(10), 1255–1261.
Patton-Mallory, M., Cramer, S. M., Smith, F. W., and Pellicane, P. J. (1997). “Nonlinear material models for analysis of bolted wood connections.” J. Struct. Eng.JSENDH, 123(8), 1063–1070.
Ramskill, T. E. (2002). “Effect of cracking on lag bolt performance.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
Sandberg, L. B., Bulleit, W. M., O’Bryant, T. L., Postlewaite, J. J., and Schaffer, J. J. (1996). “Experimental evaluation of traditional timber connections.” Proc., Int. Wood Eng. Conf., Vol. 4, Omnipress, Madison, WI, 225–231.
Sandberg, L. B., Bulleit, W. M., and Reid, E. H. (2000). “Strength and stiffness of oak pegs in traditional timber-frame joints.” J. Struct. Eng.JSENDH, 126(6), 717–723.
Schmidt, R. J., and Daniels, C. E. (1999). “Design considerations for mortise and tenon connections.” Res. Rep., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
Schmidt, R. J., and MacKay, R. B. (1997). “Timber frame tension joinery.” Res. Rep., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
Schmidt, R. J., and Miller, J. F. (2004). “Capacity of pegged mortise and tenon joinery.” Res. Rep., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
Schmidt, R. J., and Miller, J. F. (2009). “Supplemental data analysis and modeling for TFEC 1-07.” Rep., Timber Frame Engineering Council (TFEC) Technical Activities Committee, Becket, MA.
Schmidt, R. J., and Scholl, G. F. (2000). “Load duration and seasoning effects on mortise and tenon connections.” Res. Rep., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
Shanks, J. D., and Walker, P. (2005). “Experimental performance of mortice and tenon connections in green oak.” Struct. EngineerSRUEAN, 83(17), 40–45.
Timber Frame Engineering Council (TFEC). (2010). Standard for design of timber frame structures and commentary, TFEC Technical Activities Committee, Becket, MA.
Walker, C. R. (2008). “Tensile capacity of blind mortise and tenon connections at various angles.” M.S. project, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT.
Wilkinson, T. L. (1991). “Dowel bearing strength.” Res. Paper FPL-RP-505, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
Woodward, C., and Minor, J. (1988). “Failure theories for Douglas-fir in tension.” J. Struct. Eng.JSENDH, 114(12), 2808–2813.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 12, 2009
Accepted: Jul 8, 2011
Published online: Jul 11, 2011
Published in print: May 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.