Abstract

This paper explores the influence of spectrum-matched and amplitude-scaled ground motions on the development of fragility functions for structures. The quantification of the influence of these two types of ensembles on ground motions in predicting demands of structural and nonstructural systems is addressed. Moreover, the paper investigates the sensitivity of number of accelerograms in the ensembles, which produces consistent results in the nonlinear analyses. A multidegree-of-freedom (MDOF) inelastic shear-type building is used in the evaluations. The median and the dispersion of different types of damage measures are evaluated at each story and the effect of different levels of nonlinearity is investigated. Fragility functions are developed for structural and nonstructural components using the maximum likelihood method from the response generated with the selected ground motions. The sufficient number of ground motions necessary in the estimation of the response parameters and on the evaluation of the fragility functions is presented herein.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s 7th Framework Program Marie Curie International Reintegration Actions—FP7/2007-2013 under the Grant Agreement No. UNSPECIFIEDPIRG06-GA-2009-256316 of the project ICRED—Integrated European Disaster Community Resilience. This research was also partially supported by the UNSPECIFIEDMultidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER).

References

Abrahamson, N. (1998). “Non-stationary spectral matching program RSPMATCH.” PG&E internal rep., Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
Abrahamson, N., and Silva, W. (1997). “Empirical response spectra attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 68, 94–126.
Baker, J., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). “Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(9), 1077–1095.
Banon, H., and Veneziano, D. (1982). “Seismic safety of reinforced concrete members and structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10, 179–193.
Barenberg, M. E. (1989). “Inelastic response of spectrum compatible artificial accelerogram.” Earthquake Spectra, 5(4), 633–654.
Bommer, J. J., and Acevedo, A. B. (2004). “The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis.” J. Earthquake Eng., 8(Special Issue 1), 43–91.
Boore, D. (2000). “SMSIM-Fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes: Version 2.0.” Rep. OF-00-509 (revision of OFR 96-80-A), U.S. Geological Survey open-file, Washington, DC, 55.
Bracci, J. M. (1989). “Seismic damage evaluation of reinforced concrete structures.” M.S. thesis, Univ. at Buffalo (SUNY), Buffalo, NY.
Carballo, J. E., and Cornell, A. (2000). Probabilistic seismic design analysis: Spectrum matching and design, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, CA.
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., Bruneau, M., and Rutenberg, A. (2006). “Multidimensional fragility of structures: Formulation and evaluation.” Rep. MCEER-06-0002, Univ. at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 123.
Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G., and Ramasco, R. (1993). “The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: A comparison between different methods.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 22, 855–868.
FEMA. (2005). HAZUS-MH Version 1.1, FEMA’s software program for estimating potential losses from disasters, technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, 〈www.fema.gov/hazus〉.
Gasparini, D. A., and Vanmarcke, E. H. (1976). Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Hancock, J., Bommer, J. J., and Stafford, P. J. (2008). “Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(14), 1585–1607.
Hirata, K., and Somaki, T. (1994). “Fragility estimation of an isolated FBR structure considering the ultimate state of rubber bearings.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 147(2), 183–196.
Kennedy, R., and Ravindra, M. (1984). “Seismic fragility analysis for nuclear power plant risk studies.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 79(1), 47–68.
Krawinkler, H., and Zohrei, M. (1983). “Cumulative damage in steel structures subjected to earthquake ground motion.” Comput. Struct., 16, 531–541.
Naeim, F., Alimorandi, A., and Pezeshk, S. (2004). “Selection and scaling of ground motion time histories for structural design using genetic algorithms.” Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), 413–426.
Naeim, F., and Lew, M. (1995). “On the use of design spectrum compatible time histories.” Earthquake Spectra, 11(1), 111–127.
Naumoski, N., Saatcioglu, M., and Amiri-Hormozaki, K. (2004). “Effects of scaling of earthquake excitations on the dynamic response of reinforced concrete frame buildings.” Proc., 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 2917, WCEE, Vancouver, Canada.
Park, Y. J., and Ang, A. H. S. (1985). “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 111(4), 722–739.
Petersen, M. D., et al. (2008). “Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps.” U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1128, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T. (2000). “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” J. Eng. Mech., 126(12), 1224–1231.
Shome, N., and Cornell, C. A. (1999). “Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures.” Rep. No. RMS-35, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Silva, W., and Lee, K. (1987). “WES RASCALS code for synthesizing earthquake ground motions.” State of the Art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States, Rep. 24, U.S. Army Engineers Waterway Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Sivaselvan, M., and Reinhorn, A. (2000). “Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures.” J. Eng. Mech., 126(6), 633–640.
Smith, P. D. (1981). “Seismic safety margins research program, Phase I final report.” FEMA, Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA.
Somerville, P., Smith, N., Punyamurthula, S., and Sun, S. (1997). “Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project.” Rep. SAC/BD-97/04, SAC joint venture, Sacramento, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 137Issue 3March 2011
Pages: 379 - 390

History

Received: May 31, 2008
Accepted: Sep 30, 2009
Published online: Oct 2, 2009
Published in print: Mar 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

G. P. Cimellaro, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E
Assistant Professor, Dept. Structural and Geotechnical Engineering (DISTR), Politecnico di Torino, room 7 Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy; formerly, Dept. Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, The State Univ. New York, 206 Ketter Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260. E-mail: [email protected]
A. M. Reinhorn, F.ASCE [email protected]
Clifford C. Furnas Eminent Professor, Dept. Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, The State Univ. New York, 135 Ketter Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260. E-mail: [email protected]
A. D’Ambrisi [email protected]
Associate Professor, Department of Constructions, Univ. of Florence, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
M. De Stefano [email protected]
Professor and Chair, Department of Constructions, Univ. of Florence, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share