Synthesis of Bridge Approach Slab Behavior, Design, and Construction Practice
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 27, Issue 3
Abstract
Elimination of expansion joints between the bridge deck and approach slabs in an integral abutment bridge (IAB) decreases the potential for water and salt damage to a bridge’s superstructure and bearings. However, the lack of expansion joints in an IAB can lead to complex interactions between the superstructure/approach slabs and the substructure, which may have unintended consequences. In particular, cracking and settlement of structural concrete approach slabs have occurred at IABs in Illinois, so the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority (ISTHA) initiated a research project to study approach slabs at IABs. Field investigations indicated that approach slab cracking exhibits significant variability, but two general observations are (1) approach slabs with skews larger than 30° tended to have diagonal cracks that extend out of the obtuse corners and across the acute corners, and (2) longitudinal cracks (in the direction of traffic) were common among approach slabs that have little or no skew. This paper documents a synthesis of prior work and existing approach slab cracking, as well as a transportation agency survey related to design, construction, and performance of approach slabs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The research presented in this paper is part of the project “Investigation of Approach Slab Construction and Evaluation of Modular Approach Slab Designs,” which was funded by the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority (ISTHA). The contents of this article reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of ISTHA. The authors thank the members of the project Technical Review Panel, chaired by Dan Gancarz of ISTHA, for their valuable assistance with this research. The survey responses from state bridge engineers are also gratefully acknowledged.
References
AASHTO. 2002. LRFD bridge design manual. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abu-Farsakh, M., and Q. Chen. 2014. Field demonstration of new bridge approach slab designs and performance. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
Arsoy, S., R. M. Barker, and J. M. Duncan. 1999. The behavior of integral abutment bridges. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Briaud, J. L., R. W. James, and S. B. Hoffman. 1997. NCHRP synthesis 234: Settlement of bridge approaches (the bump at the end of the bridge). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Greimann, L., B. Phares, A. Faris, and J. Bigelow. 2008. Integral bridge abutment-to-approach slab connection. Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.
Hopkins, T. C. 1969. Settlement of highway bridge approaches and embankment foundations. Lexington, KY: Kentucky Transportation Center.
Hopkins, T. C., and R. C. Deen. 1970. The bump at the end of the bridge. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
IDOT (Illinois DOT). 2012. Bridge manual. Bureau of bridges and structures. Springfield, IL: IDOT.
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority. 2016. Request for proposal #16-03, Investigation of approach slab construction and evaluation of modular approach slab designs. Downers Grove, IL: Illinois Tollway.
LaFave, J. M., G. Brambila, U. Kode, G. Liu, and L. A. Fahnestock. 2021. “Field behavior of integral abutment bridges under thermal loading.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (4): 04021013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001677.
LaFave, J. M., J. K. Riddle, M. W. Jarrett, B. A. Wright, J. S. Svatora, H. An, and L. A. Fahnestock. 2016. “Numerical simulations of steel integral abutment bridges under thermal loading.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (10): 04016061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000919.
Laguros, J. G., M. M. Zaman, and I. U. Mahmood. 1990. Evaluation of causes of excessive settlements of pavements behind bridge abutments and their remedies: Phase II. (Executive summary). Oklahoma City: Oklahoma DOT.
Martin, R. D., and T. H. K. Kang. 2013. “Structural design and construction issues of approach slabs.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 18 (1): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000133.
Nassif, H., T. Abu-Amra, and N. Shah. 2002. Finite element modeling of bridge approach and transition slabs. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey DOT.
Nassif, H., N. Suksawang, N. Shah, and T. Abu-Amra. 2007. Field implementation and monitoring of bridge approach slabs. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Puppala, A. J., S. Saride, E. Archeewa, L. R. Hoyos, and S. Nazarian. 2009. Recommendations for design, construction, and maintenance of bridge approach slabs: Synthesis report. Austin, TX: Texas DOT.
Roy, S., and G. Thiagarajan. 2007. “Nonlinear finite-element analysis of reinforced concrete bridge approach slab.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (6): 801–806. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:6(801).
Seo, J., H. Ha, and J. L. Briaud. 2002. Investigation of settlement at bridge approach slab expansion joint: Numerical simulations and model tests. Austin, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
White, H. 2007. Integral abutment bridges: Comparison of current practice between European Countries and the United States of America. Albany, NY: New York State DOT.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 20, 2021
Accepted: Feb 13, 2022
Published online: May 18, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 18, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Siang Zhou, Larry A. Fahnestock, James M. LaFave, Development of Skewed Steel I-Girder Bridge Field Monitoring Strategy through Agency Survey and Numerical Simulation, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000740, 28, 1, (2023).