Challenges and Constructability Solutions for New Flare Gas Recovery Modifications in Oil and Gas Refineries: Case Studies for Five Different Flare Stacks
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 23, Issue 1
Abstract
Changes and modifications to existing equipment and structures are often required to meet the process industry’s environmental regulations. Creative constructability solutions help minimize shutdown periods that affect production and reduce revenue. It is essential to find engineering constructability solutions for such modifications during shutdown periods while keeping the facilities within regulatory compliance. The case studies presented in this paper include modifications to five different flares in an oil refinery by adding a new flare gas recovery (FGR) to reduce emissions. The case studies examine the challenges to and solutions for projects that involved an oil refinery with FGR modifications for five different flares. These modifications required the bottom portion of existing derricked flare stacks to be removed and replaced with new stack tie-in sections designed to reduce emissions. The objective was to determine a way to accommodate the new FGR tie-in installations without having to perform a total removal of the flare stacks. Among the challenges included checking the capacity of the existing structures to support the dead load of the flare stack as well as temporary wind loads, maneuvering new steel through existing structures and piping leading to irregular geometries, and using temporary steel plate mat foundations in lieu of concrete foundations due to geotechnical concerns and limited excavation clearances. The solutions include reinforcing the existing derrick structures, using hydraulic jacks to control deflection, adding new additional support structures down to grade, and adding a new temporary foundation, or a combination of these solutions. The solutions presented saved the refinery significant time and money in additional downtime in case flare removal would be required. To develop the solutions, three-dimensional laser scanning and structural modeling was used, and a unique deflection-controlled hydraulic jacking process was developed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AISC. (2005). Steel construction manual, 13th Ed., Chicago.
ASCE. (2005). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-05, Reston, VA.
ASCE. (2011). Wind loads for petrochemical and other industrial facilities, Reston, VA.
ASCE. (2015). “Design loads on structures during construction.” ASCE 37-14, Reston, VA.
ICC (International Code Council). (2006). International building code, Washington, DC.
PIP (Process Industry Practices). (2004). “Structural design criteria.” PIP STC01015, Austin, TX.
Sherwood, D. R., and Whistance, D. J. (1991). The piping guide: For the design and drafting of industrial piping systems, Construction Trades Press, Clinton, NC.
STAAD.Pro V8i [Computer software]. Bentley Systems, Exton, PA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 23 • Issue 1 • February 2018
Copyright
© 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 24, 2017
Accepted: Jul 6, 2017
Published online: Dec 14, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 14, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.