Technical Papers
Jun 5, 2017

Quality of Road Maintenance Work Performed by State Force versus Private Contractors in Nevada

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 22, Issue 4

Abstract

In the United States, state departments of transportation (DOTs) use primarily state force (SF) or private contractors to maintain road systems. Private contractors are contracted under method-based contracting (MBC) or performance-based contracting (PBC). Limited research has been conducted to assess the quality of road-maintenance work performed by private contractors. In this study, with the help of a national survey of state DOTs, questionnaire responses from road users, and on-site visits, the quality of three road-maintenance activities—chip seal, striping, and street sweeping—was assessed. The results show that the quality of chip seal performed by the SF was significantly better than that performed by private contractors. On the basis of the survey of road users, for the activity of striping, the work performed by private contractors was significantly higher in quality than work done by the SF. For the activity of street sweeping, the road user and the nationwide DOT surveys showed that SFs significantly outperformed private contractors. The results of this study will help state DOTs identify the respective maintenance activities that should be performed using SFs and private contractors.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research team acknowledges the NDOT for funding this research and providing road-maintenance data. The research was funded under NDOT Agreement P07-12-803. In addition, the authors thank all the state DOTs, road users, NDOT maintenance and asset management personnel, and staff of private contractors who provided responses for this study.

References

Baker, M. (1999). “Asset preservation plan for the District of Columbia national highway system.” Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation and District of Columbia Department of Public Works. 〈http://www.zietlow.com/docs/washdcap.pdf〉 (Nov. 5, 1999).
Berkland, T., and Bell, L. C. (2007). “Performance-based contracting and improving the current contracting process.” Final Rep. Research Project 666, South Carolina Dept. of Transportation, Columbia, SC.
Ellevset, O. (2001). “Output- and performance–based road contracts (OPRC).” Sub-Saharan Africa transport policy program, World Bank, Washington, DC, 〈https://www.ssatp.org/sites/ssatp/files/publications/HTML/Conferences/Bamako05/Final-Report/Annex10-Presentations/02-Olav.pdf〉.
Gharaibeh, N. G., Shelton, D., Ahmed, J., Chowdhyry, A., and Krugler, P. E. (2011). “Development of performance-based evaluation methods and specifications for roadside maintenance.” Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Hartwig, T., Mumssen, Y., and Schliessler, A. (2005). “Output-based aid in Chad: Using performance-based contracts to improve roads.” OB approaches 33160. 〈https://www.gpoba.org/sites/gpoba/files/ChadRoadsOBApproaches_2.pdf〉 (Dec. 16, 2016).
Leard Statistics. (2016). Mann-Whitney U test in SPSS. 〈https://statistics.laerd.com/premium-sample/mwut/mann-whitney-test-in-spss-2.php〉 (Apr. 15, 2016).
Liautaud, G. (2004). “Maintaining roads: Experience with output-based Contracts in Argentina.” Viewpoint, World Bank, Washington, DC, 39–45.
Martin, L. (1993). “How to compare costs between in-house and contracted services.” How-to guide 4, Reason Foundation, Los Angeles.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). (2003). “State DOT outsourcing and private-sector utilization.” A synthesis of highway practices, Synthesis 313, Washington, DC.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). (2011). “Determining highway maintenance Costs.” Rep. 688, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Popescu, L., and Monismith, C. L. (2006). “Performance-based pay factors for asphalt concrete construction: comparison with a currently used experience-based approach.” Rep. UCPRC-RR-2006-16 CALTRANS, Sacramento, CA.
Ribreau, N. (2004). “Synopsis of WSDOT’s review of highway maintenance outsourcing experience.” Transportation Research Record, 1877.
SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation). (2006). “Performance contracting framework fostered by highways for LIFE.” DTFH61-01-C-00180 Task 115, McLean, VA.
Schexnayder, C., and Ohrn, L. G. (1997). “Highway specifications—Quality versus pay.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 437–443.
Segal, G. F., Moore, A. T., and McCarthy, S. (2003). “Contracting for road and highway maintenance.” Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles.
Shrestha, K., and Shrestha, P. P. (2016). “Cost and customer satisfaction of culvert cleaning and sweeping road projects in Nevada.” Construction Research Congress 2016, ASCE, Reston, VA, 467–476.
Stankevich, N., Qureshi, N., and Queiroz, C. (2009). “Performance-based contracting for preservation and improvement of road assets.” Transport Note, TN-27, World Bank, Washington, DC.
World Bank. (2002). Sample bidding document, procurement of performance-based management and maintenance of roads, procurement of performance-based management and maintenance of roads (output-based service contract), Washington, DC.
Yan, Q., Wang, F., Gendy, A. E., and Li, Y. (2013). “Evaluation of the effectiveness of Mississippi’s pavement warranty program.” J. Trans. Research Record, 2366(1), 98–109.
Zietlow, G. (2004). Implementing performance-based road management and maintenance contracts in development countries—An instrument of German technical cooperation.” German Development Cooperation, Eschborn, Germany.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 22Issue 4November 2017

History

Received: Jan 20, 2017
Accepted: Feb 24, 2017
Published online: Jun 5, 2017
Published in print: Nov 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Nov 5, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P.E.
Licensed Engineer, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction, Univ. of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6362-2315. E-mail: [email protected]
Kishor Shrestha, Ph.D., S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Student, Dept. of General Engineering, Montana Tech of the Univ. of Montana, Butte, MT 59701. E-mail: [email protected]
Mylinh Lidder [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Chief, Maintenance and Asset Management Division, Nevada Dept. of Transportation, Carson City, NV 89712. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share