Technical Papers
Aug 19, 2013

Life-Cycle Assessment for Construction of Sustainable Infrastructure

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 19, Issue 1

Abstract

The architecture-engineering-construction (AEC) industry faces increasing demands on its projects while budgets appear to be shrinking. Building owners and operators seem to want their buildings to do more for less cost. Although this may seem counterintuitive, it aligns nicely with a sustainable-architecture approach of less is more. Moreover, in a shift from exclusively considering first costs for a project, the AEC industry seems to be moving in the direction of life-cycle cost considerations, furthering the opportunity for a more sustainable built environment. Often sustainable is synonymous with achieving certification [e.g., Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and Infrastructure Voluntary Evaluation Sustainability Tool (INVEST) certification]. Whereas the authors acknowledge that certification can improve particular aspects of sustainability, it is necessary to take a broader approach and consider economic, environmental, and social dimensions of sustainability. In this paper, the authors explore each of these dimensions and present examples of how the AEC industry can measure, balance, and monetize them.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. This work was also supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Building Technology, State, and Community Programs, of the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

References

Benoît, C., et al. (2010). “The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: Just in time!” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 15(2), 156–163.
Chester, M., et al. (2012) “Smart growth along the proposed Phoenix light rail expansion lines can reduce future urban energy consumption and environmental impacts.” Rep. SSEBE-CESEM-2012-CPR-013, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ.
Chester, M., and Horvath, A. (2009). “Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains.” Environ. Res. Lett., 4(2), 024008.
Chester, M., and Ryerson, M. (2013). “Environmental assessment of air and high-speed rail corridors.” Synthesis ACRP 11–03/Topic S02-08, Airport Cooperative Research Program, Washington, DC.
City of Long Beach. (2009). “Green building construction.” Long Beach municipal code, 〈http://ag.ca.gov/globalwarming/pdf/long_beach.pdf〉 (Apr. 8, 2013).
City of New York. (2011). “Benchmarking of energy and water use.” Section 103-06, Subchapter C of Chapter 100 of Title 1, 〈http://www.nyc.gov/html/dob/downloads/rules/1_RCNY_103-06_050111.pdf〉 (Apr. 6, 2013).
Cotton, B. W. (2011). “In pursuit of sustainable highways.” Public Roads, 75(3). 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/11novdec/03.cfm〉 (Apr. 1, 2013).
EPA. (2011). “ENERGY STAR portfolio manager overview.” 〈http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=evaluate_performance.bus_portfoliomanager〉 (Sep. 25, 2011).
EPA. (2013). “EPA’s greenhouse gas emission reductions.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/ghg/〉 (Apr. 8, 2013).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2013). “Highway statistics series.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics.cfm〉 (Apr. 1, 2013).
Fraser, A., and Chester, M. (2013). “Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and costs of the deployment of the Los Angeles Roadway Network.” Rep. SSEBE-CESEM-2013-WPS-001, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ.
International Living Future Institute (ILFI). (2010). “Living building challenge.” 〈https://ilbi.org/lbc〉 (Dec. 10, 2012).
International Standards Organization (ISO). (2006). “Environmental management: Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines.” ISO14040:2006, Geneva.
Kimball, M., Chester, M., Gino, C., and Reyna, J. (2012). “Transit-oriented development infill in Phoenix can reduce future transportation and land use life-cycle environmental impacts.” Rep. SSEBE-CESEM-2012-RPR-002, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ.
National Research Council (NRC). (1999). Our common journey: A transition toward sustainability, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Pehnt, M. (2006). “Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies.” Renew. Energy, 31(1), 55–71.
Stadel, A., Gursel, P., and Masanet, E. (2012). “Life-cycle evaluation of concrete building construction as a strategy for sustainable cities.” 〈http://energy.lbl.gov/staff/masanet/LBNL_B-PATH.pdf〉 (Mar. 4, 2013).
Stantec. (2011). “Stage 2 energy progress report.” Washington, DC.
Stokes, J., and Horvath, A. (2009). “Energy and air emission effects of water supply.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(8), 2680–2687.
Swarr, T. E., et al. (2008). Environmental life cycle costing: A code of practice, Society of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology (SETAC), Pensacola, FL.
Thornton, B. (2011). “VRF life cycle cost analysis.” 〈http://rtf.nwcouncil.org/subcommittees/vchp/VRFLifeCycleCost1-23-2013.pdf〉 (Apr. 1, 2013).
Todd, J. A., and Curran, M. A. (1999). “Streamlined life-cycle assessment: A final report from the SETAC North America Streamlined LCA Workgroup.” Society of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology (SETAC), Pensacola, FL.
Turner, C., and Frankel, M. (2008). “Energy rerformance of LEED for new construction buildings.” 〈http://www.newbuildings.org/sites/default/files/Energy_Performance_of_LEED-NC_Buildings-Final_3-4-08b.pdf〉 (Apr. 1, 2013).
U.S. DOE. (2010). Buildings energy data book, Washington, DC.
U.S. DOT. (2010). “INVEST.” 〈http://www.sustainablehighways.org/〉 (Oct. 14, 2012).
U.S. Energy Information Administration (U.S. EIA). (2003). “Commercial buildings energy consumption survey (CBECS).” Washington, DC. 〈http://www.eia.gov/emeu/cbecs/〉 (Jul. 5, 2011).
U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). (2004). LEED green building rating system for existing buildings: Upgrades, operations and maintenance (LEED-EB), Washington, DC.
U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). (2009). LEED green building rating system for new construction, Washington, DC.
Wachs, M. (1993). “Learning from Los Angeles: Transport, urban form, and air quality.” Transportation, 20(4), 329–354.
Wiek, A., and Binder, C. (2005). “Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 25(6), 589–608.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future, Oxford University Press, New York.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 19Issue 1February 2014
Pages: 89 - 94

History

Received: Apr 8, 2013
Accepted: Aug 14, 2013
Published online: Aug 19, 2013
Published in print: Feb 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kristen Parrish, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287-0204 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mikhail Chester, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287-0204. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share