Use of Value Engineering to Develop Creative Design Solutions for Marine Construction Projects
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 19, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper examines the potential of value engineering (VE) as a problem-solving tool for addressing various challenges in the marine construction industry. Through a review of large numbers of challenging engineering problems in the marine environment, the authors identified various complications caused by dynamic and uncertain marine environments in both the prebid and postbid stages of construction projects. These unexpected challenges required the project team to identify optimal solutions in a comprehensive and efficient manner. In past construction projects, a 10-step approach was designed and used by the authors to identify solutions for unexpected engineering problems. The approach has three limitations: (1) it is an informal and time-consuming process involving possibly redundant communications and coordination; (2) it is not specific and detailed enough to ensure that the optimal solution is in fact considered and selected in a comprehensive and efficient manner; and (3) it does not integrate standard metrics other than the estimated cost that can be used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of a solution in terms of productivity, quality, safety, and environmental impact. This paper first presents the current 10-step process for solving marine construction problems and limitations of this process. The paper then describes the VE seven-step process and highlights how the VE process and the 10-step approach share the same structure. All steps in the VE process can find correspondences in the 10-step process, whereas VE methodology formalizes the value of a solution and quantitative performance metrics to harvest and evaluate ideas from groups of engineers in a more systematic manner. Based on this shared structure, the paper discusses how to augment the 10-step approach with the VE methodology to achieve more comprehensive and efficient problem solving. Using a case study, the authors explain how such augmentation can effectively integrate the knowledge and experience of groups of engineers with diverse backgrounds in marine construction. Finally, the paper suggests future directions for using VE for marine construction projects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Bittner, R. B., and Ellman, R. (2009). Deep marine foundations, A perspective on the design and construction of deep marine foundations, Deep Foundation Institute, New York.
Bittner, R. B., and Patterson, B. (2012). “Float-in cofferdam over 63 large pipe diameter piles.” Deep foundations, Deep Foundation Institute, New York, 40–43.
Bittner, R. B., and Schmitt, R. L. (2011). “Construction engineering process and knowledge requirements for fostering creative design solutions on infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 772–776.
Dell’Isola, A. (1982). “Value engineering in the construction industry.” 〈http://www.getcited.org〉 (Oct. 20, 2012).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2012). “Value engineering.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/〉 (Oct. 7, 2012).
Institute for Defense Analyses. (2012). “DOD value engineering program.” 〈http://rtoc.ida.org/ve/ve.html〉 (Oct. 7, 2012).
SAVE International. (2004). “Value analysis/value engineering: The forgotten lean technique.” 〈http://www.value-eng.org/〉 (Oct. 20, 2012).
SAVE International. (2012). “SAVE: What is value engineering.” 〈http://www.value-eng.org/value_engineering.php〉 (Oct. 7, 2012).
Shen, Q., and Liu, G. (2003). “Critical success factors for value management studies in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 485–491.
Spreng, R., Bittner, R. B., Gernigon, P., and Piquet, A. (2001). “Development and design of casting yard.” The Oresund technical publications - The tunnel, N. J. Gimsing and C. Iversen, eds., Øresundsbro Konsortiet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 113–133.
Upton, H. F. (2011). “The Deepwater Horizon oil spill and the Gulf of Mexico fishing industry.” Congressional research service, CRS Report for Congress, Washington, DC, 21.
U.S. General Services Administration (GSA). (1993). “Value engineering program guide for design and construction.” Washington, DC.
VM Services. (2010). “Reducing manufacturing cost of a product without compromising client specifications.” 〈http://www.vmservices.co.za/case-studies/27-value-engineering-in-manufacturing〉 (Oct. 7, 2012).
Washington State Department of Transportation. (2013). “Floating bridge and landings project area.” SR 520 bridge replacement and HOV program, Seattle.
Yan, L. (2012). “Value engineering application in construction project management.” 2012 Int. Conf. on Industrial Control and Electronics Engineering (ICICEE), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 1265–1268.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 2, 2013
Accepted: Jul 17, 2013
Published online: Jul 19, 2013
Published in print: Feb 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.