Approximations of Lateral Displacements of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Symmetric Haunched Beams in the Elastic Range of Response Using Commercial Software
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 18, Issue 2
Abstract
Commercial software for structural analysis and design has significantly evolved in recent years. Nowadays, they are more user-friendly, in addition to providing engineers with more modeling options to solve complex problems and geometries. Tapered elements in general and haunched beams in particular were traditionally difficult to model in the past; therefore, most commercial software did not include them in their element libraries. Recently, leading commercial software worldwide for structural analysis such as ETABS or STAAD-Pro allow engineers to model haunched beams in the elastic range of response. However, the technical information provided within the software’s manual does not always describe the details of the numerical modeling; i.e., whether it is based on rigorous traditional methods or is just an approximation based upon the calculus of variations. In this paper the approximations obtained with commercial software for a set of RC frames with symmetric haunched beams under lateral loading in the elastic range of response are reported when compared with those obtained with a traditional beam theory in which shear deformations are included. It is shown that the modeling used in commercial software is in general reasonable; however, it leads to an underestimation of the lateral displacements. Depending on the software and the modeling option used, lateral displacements vary from 62 to almost 100% of those calculated using traditional beam theory.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Balkaya, C. (2001). “Behavior and modeling of nonprismatic members having T-sections.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(8), 940–946.
Bentley Systems, Inc. (BSI). (2008). STAAD.Pro 2007 technical reference manual, BSI, Exton, PA.
Brown, C. J. (1984). “Approximate stiffness matrix for tapered beams.” J. Struct. Eng., 110(12), 3050–3055.
Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSI). (2005). CSI analysis reference manual for SAP2000, ETABS, and SAFE, CSI, Berkeley, CA.
Eisenberger, M. (1985). “Explicit stiffness matrices for non-prismatic members.” Comput. Struct., 20(4), 715–720.
El-Mezaini, N., Balkaya, C., and Citipitioglu, E. (1991). “Analysis of frames with nonprismatic members.” J. Struct. Eng., 117(6), 1573–1592.
Failla, G., and Impollonia, N. (2011). “General finite element description for non-uniform and discontinuous beam elements.” Arch. Appl. Mech., 82(1), 43–67.
Just, D. J. (1977). “Plane frameworks of tapering box and I-section.” J. Struct. Div., 103(1), 71–86.
Luo, Y.-S., Xu, X., and Wu, F. (2007). “Accurate stiffness matrix for nonprismatic members.” J. Struct. Eng., 133(8), 1168–1175.
Martínez-Becerril, L. A. (2011). “Evaluación de las aproximaciones obtenidas con software comercial para marcos con vigas de sección variable.” Proyectos Terminales I y II, Dept. de Materiales, Univ. Autónoma Metropolitana Azcapotzalco, Mexico City (in Spanish).
Medwadowski, S. J. (1984). “Nonprismatic shear beams.” J. Struct. Eng., 110(5), 1067–1082.
Portland Cement Association (PCA). (1958). Handbook of frame constants: Beam factors and moment coefficients for members of variable section, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.
Prakash, V., Powell, G. H., and Filippou, F. C. (1992), “DRAIN-2DX: Base program user guide.” Rep. No. UCB/SEMM-92/29, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Rajasekaran, S. (1994). “Equations for tapered thin-walled beams of generic open section.” J. Eng. Mech., 120(8), 1607–1629.
Schreyer, H. L. (1978). “Elementary theory for linearly tapered beams.” J. Eng. Mech., 104(3), 515–527.
Shooshtari, A., and Khajavi, R. (2010). “An efficient procedure to find shape functions and stiffness matrices of nonprismatic Euler–Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam elements.” Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 29(5), 826–836.
Tena-Colunga, A. (1994). “Concerns regarding the seismic design of reinforced concrete haunched beams.” ACI Struct. J., 90(3), 287–293.
Tena-Colunga, A. (1996). “Stiffness formulation for nonprismatic beam elements.” J. Struct. Eng., 122(12), 1484–1489.
Tena-Colunga, A. (2003). “Discussion of ‘Behavior and modeling of nonprismatic members having T-sections’ by Can Balkaya.” J. Struct. Eng., 129(3), 414–419.
Tena-Colunga, A. (2007). Análisis de estructuras con métodos matriciales, 1st Ed., Limusa, Mexico City (in Spanish).
Tena-Colunga, A., and Zaldo-García, A. (1994). “Ductilidad de marcos con trabes acarteladas y columnas de sección variable.” Rep. FJBS/CIS-94/04, Centro de Investigación Sísmica, AC, Fundación Javier Barros Sierra (in Spanish).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 18 • Issue 2 • May 2013
Pages: 92 - 100
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 1, 2011
Accepted: Jul 24, 2012
Published online: Jul 28, 2012
Published in print: May 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.