Impact of Crew Scheduling on Project Performance
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 18, Issue 1
Abstract
Contractors have responded to the growing pressure from owners to shorten project duration by employing a variety of crew-scheduling techniques. Unfortunately, only a limited knowledge base exists for determining the impact of different crew schedules on project performance in terms of cost, duration, productivity, and safety. Standard crew schedules include those that require crews to work 40 h per week, including five 8-h days, four 10-h days, or a second shift. Overtime schedules are also common, which require crews to work additional hours beyond the standard 40 h per week. These overtime schedules include five 9-h days, six 8-h days, or five 10-h days. In addition to the standard and overtime schedules, several other crew-scheduling techniques have been used successfully by contractors. This paper presents the results of a study on the impact of crew-scheduling techniques on overall project performance. The paper identifies the proper application and conditions for successful use of various crew-scheduling techniques and provides a comprehensive comparison that outlines a variety of crew-scheduling options, along with their impact on labor efficiency, project duration, worker safety, and project cost. Contractors can use the results to aid them in the selection of a scheduling technique to best meet the specific requirements of a project.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Business Roundtable. (1982). Construction labor motivation. New York.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1988). “The effects of scheduled overtime and shift schedule on construction craft productivity.” Res. Rep. SD-43, Austin, TX.
Fly, R. D. (1980). “Why rotating shifts sharply reduce productivity.” Superv. Manage., 25(1), 16–21.
Folkard, S., and Tucker, P. (2003). “Shift work, safety and productivity.” Occup. Med. (Chic. Ill), 53(2), 95–101.
Gould, C. H. (1988). “Rolling fours: Novel work schedule.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 114(4), 577–593.
Hanna, A. S. (2003). “The effectiveness of innovative crew scheduling techniques.” Res. Rep. RR185-11, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Hanna, A. S., and Sullivan, K. T. (2004). Factors affecting labor productivity for electrical contractors, The Electrical Contracting Foundation, Bethesda, MD.
Hanna, A. S., Taylor, C. S., and Sullivan, K. T. (2005). “Impact of extended overtime on construction labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(6), 734–739.
Hung, R. (1992). “Improving productivity and quality through workforce scheduling.” Ind. Manage. (Des Plaines), 34(6), 6–8.
Jun, D. H., and El-Rayes, K. (2010). “Optimizing the utilization of multiple labor shifts in construction projects.” Autom. Construct., 19(2), 109–119.
Larew, R. E. (1998). “Are any construction overtime ‘studies’ reliable?” Cost Eng., 40(9), 24–27.
National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA). (1969). Overtime and productivity in electrical construction. Washington, DC.
National Joint Council for the Engineering Construction Industry (NJCECI). (2010). National agreement for the engineering construction industry 2010–2012, Walmar House, London.
Noyce, D. A., and Hanna, A. S. (1997). “Planned schedule compression concept file for electrical contractors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(2), 189–197.
Penkala, D. (1997). “Improving productivity and profitability around the clock.” Natl. Prod. Rev., 16(3), 29–35.
Schexnayder, C. J., and Mayo, R. E. (2004). Construction management fundamentals, McGraw Hill, Boston.
Shapira, A., and Lyachin, B. (2009). “Identification and analysis of factors affecting safety on construction sites with tower cranes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(1), 24–33.
Thomas, H. R. (1992). “Effects of scheduled overtime on labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(1), 60–76.
Zhao, I., Bogossian, F., and Turner, C. (2010). “Shift work and work related injuries among health care workers: A systematic review.” Aust. J. Adv. Nurs., 27(3), 62–74.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 18 • Issue 1 • February 2013
Pages: 35 - 44
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 19, 2011
Accepted: Nov 10, 2011
Published online: Nov 12, 2011
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.