Technical Papers
Aug 31, 2022

An Integrated Reliability Method with a Newly Developed Interaction Rule for Steel Pipelines with Multiple Corrosion Defects

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13, Issue 4

Abstract

Although essential contributions have been made to the reliability analysis of corroded pipelines, the interacting effect between adjacent corrosion defects is rarely considered, let alone the effects of the corrosion depth and steel grade on the interacting effect. This paper proposes a new reliability method to fill the gap. First, the finite-element method and regression analysis were applied to investigate how the corrosion depth and steel grade impact the interacting effect and develop new interaction rules. Second, the new interaction rule, burst pressure model, Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), sensitivity analysis, feature scaling, and artificial neural network (ANN) were integrated to predict reliability. The proposed method combines several approaches to achieve a more accurate and efficient reliability estimation of pipelines with multiple corrosion defects than conventional assessment methods. An example is given to demonstrate the method. Results show that the limit spacing distance grows as the corrosion depth increases. The growth of the limit spacing distance of the X80 pipeline is more significant than that of the X65 pipeline. Existing interaction rules introduce conservatism to the prediction of the limit spacing distance. Two new interaction rules were developed and can realize better prediction accuracy by considering the corrosion depth and steel grade. Besides, the interacting effect significantly affects the maintenance time. The maintenance time lag between the X65 pipeline ignoring and considering the interacting effect is about 7.5 years. Different interaction rules result in different reliability descending paths. Because the new interaction rule was developed for this case, it could provide a more accurate reliability analysis. The trained ANN shows excellent prediction accuracy and high computing efficiency. The mean squared error in the reliability predicted by the ANN is 2.4×106. The elapsed time of the ANN prediction is about 50 times shorter than that of the MCS.

Practical Applications

In engineering practice, corrosion defects usually occur in patches, and the interacting effect between adjacent defects impairs the structural reliability of corroded pipelines. The corrosion depth and steel grade are found to significantly affect the interacting effect and limit spacing distance. The new interaction rules can be applied to achieve a more accurate limit spacing distance estimation by considering the effects of the corrosion depth and steel grade. The interacting effect plays a vital role in the reliability analysis of corroded pipelines. The integrated reliability method proposed in this paper considers the interacting effect and interaction rule. In practical application, once the pipeline and defect information, such as wall thickness and corrosion depth, is gathered, the proposed method can be used to realize a more accurate and effective reliability analysis of pipelines with multiple corrosion defects. Thus, the proposed reliability method and results of this paper are beneficial for the integrity management of corroded pipelines.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. FEM models and related codes are not available.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC RGPIN-2018-05703) and Future Energy Systems under Canada First Research Excellence Fund (FES-T14-P02).

References

Abdelmoety, A. K., Q. Zheng, Y. Li, M. Kainat, N. Yoosef-Ghodsi, and S. Adeeb. 2021. “Probability of failure associated with design and safety factors for intact and corroded pipes under internal pressure.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (3): 04021010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000544.
Askari, M., M. Aliofkhazraei, and S. Afroukhteh. 2019. “A comprehensive review on internal corrosion and cracking of oil and gas pipelines.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 71 (81): 102971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2019.102971.
ASME. 2012. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines. ASME B31G. New York: ASME.
Bao, J., and W. Zhou. 2021. “Influence of depth thresholds and interaction rules on the burst capacity evaluation of naturally corroded pipelines.” J. Pipeline Sci. Eng. 1 (1): 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.01.001.
Benjamin, A. C., D. J. Cunha, and J. Cunha. 2007. “New method for the prediction of the failure pressure of interacting corrosion defects.” In Proc., 10th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf. Richardson, TX: Onepetro.
Benjamin, A. C., E. Q. de Andrade, B. P. Jacob, L. C. Pereira, and P. R. S. Machado. 2006. “Failure behavior of colonies of corrosion defects composed of symmetrically arranged defects.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 2006 Int.Pipeline Conf.: Integrity Management; Poster Session; Student Paper Competition, 417–432. New York: ASME.
Bhardwaj, U., A. Teixeira, and C. G. Soares. 2020a. “Uncertainty in reliability of thick high strength pipelines with corrosion defects subjected to internal pressure.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 188 (12): 104170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104170.
Bhardwaj, U., A. Teixeira, and C. G. Soares. 2020b. “Uncertainty quantification of burst pressure models of corroded pipelines.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 188 (Dec): 104208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104208.
Caleyo, F., J. González, and J. Hallen. 2002. “A study on the reliability assessment methodology for pipelines with active corrosion defects.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 79 (1): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(01)00124-7.
Chen, Y., H. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Li, and J. Zhou. 2015. “Failure assessment of x80 pipeline with interacting corrosion defects.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 47 (Jan): 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.09.013.
Coulson, K. E. W., and R. G. Worthingham. 1990. “Standard damage-assessment approach is overly conservative.” Oil Gas J. 88 (15): 7084745.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2015. Oil and gas pipeline systems. CSA Z662-15. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2019. Corroded pipeline. DNV-RP-F101. Oslo, Norway: DNV.
Han, C., H. Zhang, and J. Zhang. 2016. “Failure pressure analysis of the pipe with inner corrosion defects by fem.” Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 11 (Jun): 5046–5062. https://doi.org/10.20964/2016.06.6.
Jones, N., S. E. Birch, R. S. Birch, L. Zhu, and M. Brown. 1992. “An experimental study on the lateral impact of fully clamped mild steel pipes.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part E: J. Process Mech. Eng. 206 (2): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1992_206_207_02.
Kiefner, J. F., and P. H. Vieth. 1990. “PC program speeds new criterion for evaluating corroded pipe.” Oil Gas J. 88 (34): 91–93.
Leis, B., and D. Stephens. 1997. “An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe—Part I: Current status.” In Proc., 7th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf. Richardson, TX: Onepetro.
Li, X., Y. Bai, C. Su, and M. Li. 2016. “Effect of interaction between corrosion defects on failure pressure of thin wall steel pipeline.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 138 (Jan): 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.01.002.
Lu, H., Z.-D. Xu, T. Iseley, and J. C. Matthews. 2021. “Novel data-driven framework for predicting residual strength of corroded pipelines.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (4): 04021045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000587.
Netto, T., U. Ferraz, and S. Estefen. 2005. “The effect of corrosion defects on the burst pressure of pipelines.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 61 (8): 1185–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.02.010.
Palencia, O. G., A. P. Teixeira, and C. Guedes Soares. 2018. “Safety of pipelines subjected to deterioration processes modeled through dynamic Bayesian networks.” J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 141 (1): 011602. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040573.
Peng, S., Z. Zhang, E. Liu, W. Liu, and W. Qiao. 2021. “A new hybrid algorithm model for prediction of internal corrosion rate of multiphase pipeline.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 85 (23): 103716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103716.
Seghier, M. E. A. B., B. Keshtegar, J. A. Correia, G. Lesiuk, and A. M. De Jesus. 2019. “Reliability analysis based on hybrid algorithm of m5 model tree and monte carlo simulation for corroded pipelines: Case of study x60 steel grade pipes.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 97 (Feb): 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.061.
Shuai, Y., J. Shuai, and K. Xu. 2017. “Probabilistic analysis of corroded pipelines based on a new failure pressure model.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 81 (22): 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.050.
Stephens, D. R., and B. N. Leis. 2000. “Development of an alternative criterion for residual strength of corrosion defects in moderate-to high-toughness pipe.” In Vol. 40252 of Proc., Int. Pipeline Conf. New York: ASME.
Sun, J., and Y. F. Cheng. 2018. “Assessment by finite element modeling of the interaction of multiple corrosion defects and the effect on failure pressure of corroded pipelines.” Eng. Struct. 165 (42): 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.040.
Sun, J., Y. F. Cheng, J. Woo, M. Kainat, and S. Hassanien. 2021. “Assessment of interaction between a dent and an adjacent corrosion feature on pipelines and the effect on pipeline failure pressure by finite-element modeling.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (3): 04021029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000570.
Suo, B., and H. Guo. 2018. “Sensitivity analysis for epistemic uncertain system based on sobol’ method.” J. Donghua Univ. 4 (16): 69–72.
Tee, K. F., and K. Pesinis. 2017. “Reliability prediction for corroding natural gas pipelines.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 65 (Feb): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.02.009.
Xu, W.-Z., C. B. Li, J. Choung, and J.-M. Lee. 2017. “Corroded pipeline failure analysis using artificial neural network scheme.” Adv. Eng. Software 112 (Aug): 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.006.
Zakikhani, K., F. Nasiri, and T. Zayed. 2020. “A review of failure prediction models for oil and gas pipelines.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (1): 03119001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000407.
Zhang, H., and Z. Tian. 2020. “Reliability assessment of corroded pipeline considering multiple defects interaction based on an artificial neural network method.” In 2020 Asia-Pacific Int. Symp. on Advanced Reliability and Maintenance Modeling (APARM), 1–6. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/APARM49247.2020.9209428.
Zhang, H., J. Zhang, R. Lin, and Y. Li. 2020. “Numerical study on mechanism responses of submarine pipeline impacted by bar-shaped falling object.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 11 (4): 04020051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000505.
Zhang, J., Z. Liang, and J. Han. 2014. “Failure analysis and finite element simulation of above ground oil–gas pipeline impacted by rockfall.” J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 14 (4): 530–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9847-x.
Zhang, S., and W. Zhou. 2021. “Development of a burst capacity model for corroded pipelines considering corrosion defect width and a revised folias factor equation.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 88 (12): 103812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103812.
Zhang, Z., L. Guo, and Y. F. Cheng. 2021. “Interaction between internal and external defects on pipelines and its effect on failure pressure.” Thin-Walled Struct. 159 (Aug): 107230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107230.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13Issue 4November 2022

History

Received: Dec 4, 2021
Accepted: Jun 15, 2022
Published online: Aug 31, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 31, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2G8. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2G8 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1546-2924. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Numerical Analysis of Failure Mechanisms in High-Strength Pipelines Subject to the Interplay of Internal Corrosion and Spanning, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1569, 15, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share