Experimental Study of Pressure and Soil Effects on Fluidization and Mobile Bed Zones around Buried Leaking Pipes
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13, Issue 4
Abstract
Leakage in underground water pipes has become critical because of increasing water demand. Many studies have been conducted based on the knowledge of soil–water interaction, but few of them have investigated the internal erosion and possible zones forming around cracks as a result of leakage. This experimental investigation set out to achieve a better understanding of the mentioned problem. An unplasticized PVC pipe with a longitudinal crack was installed in a box with different types of soil, then water was flowed through the pipe. The aim was to determine the geometry of the zones possibly forming around the crack. The observation was made possible by installing the pipe beside a glass wall situated on the front face. Two zones (fluidization and mobile bed) with different directions that were geometrically different with soil types and water head pressures were observed. The effects of soil properties [e.g., median diameter (), Atterberg limits, porosity, and hydraulic conductivity] were also determined, and their relationships with the height, width, and maximum cross-sectional area of the mentioned zones were studied. The results demonstrated that the maximum height and maximum area of the zones were strongly correlated with water pressure.
Practical Applications
The significance of water in all aspects of human life is undeniable. Nowadays, a huge amount of water is wasted due to various reasons such as water loss from damaged parts of water distribution systems. The amount of leaking water can be impacted by factors including the surrounding environment, which is soil for underground pipelines. In addition, research has shown occurrence of fluidization phenomenon in which water and soil mixture around the leakage position flow in a confined area. Every underground infrastructure, including the leaking pipe, situated in the fluidized area can be affected and damaged. Knowing the mechanism of fluidization and factors affecting this area can thus help prevent underground facilities from damage. This experimental investigation examined the effects of pressure on the shape and size of zones around the leakage position. Furthermore, changes in the geometry of the mentioned area were studied by different types of surrounding soil.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository online in accordance with funder data retention policies: (1) https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13591499 [the relationships between leakage zones dimensions (height, width, and cross-sectional area) and soil characteristics (, plasticity index, porosity and hydraulic conductivity) is presented for various pressures]; and (2) https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19565953 (three video clips have been presented to demonstrate the fluidization zone and mobile bed zone).
References
Alhomair, S., Z. Faeli, P. Hosseini, M. Gabr, M. Pour-Ghaz, and C. Parker. 2021. “Assessment of mitigation measures against benzene breakthrough into subsurface concrete pipe.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (1): 4020064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000512.
Alsaydalani, M. O. A., and C. R. I. Clayton. 2014. “Internal fluidization of granular material.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (3): 04013024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001039.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort ( ()). ASTM D698-12e2. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-17e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019a. Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head). ASTM D2434-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019b. Standard test methods for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. ASTM C136M-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Cassa, A. M., and J. E. van Zyl. 2014. “Predicting the leakage exponents of elastically deforming cracks in pipes.” Procedia Eng. 70 (Jan): 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.034.
Cassa, A. M., J. E. van Zyl, and R. F. Laubscher. 2010. “A numerical investigation into the effect of pressure on holes and cracks in water supply pipes.” Urban Water J. 7 (2): 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620903447613.
Cui, X. L., G. L. Tao, and J. Li. 2018. “Experiment and numerical simulation on seepage failure of sand caused by leakage of underground water pipe.” In Vol. 153 of Proc., 2nd Int. Workshop on Renewable Energy and Development (IWRED 2018), 032033. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.
De Paola, F., E. Galdiero, M. Giugni, R. Papa, and G. Urciuoli. 2014. “Experimental investigation on a buried leaking pipe.” Procedia Eng. 89 (Jan): 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.191.
Faeli, Z., S. Alhomair, P. Hosseini, M. Gabr, and M. Pour-Ghaz. 2021. “Factors affecting multiphase benzene breakthrough into drainage concrete pipe in the unsaturated subsurface profile.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (3): 5021004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000554.
Fox, S., R. Collins, and J. Boxall. 2016. “Physical investigation into the significance of ground conditions on dynamic leakage behavior.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. 65 (2): 103–115. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2015.079.
Greyvenstein, B., and J. E. van Zyl. 2007. “An experimental investigation into the pressure-leakage relationship of some failed water pipes.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. 56 (2): 117–124. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2007.065.
He, Y., D. Z. Zhu, T. Zhang, Y. Shao, and T. Yu. 2017. “Experimental observations on the initiation of sand-bed erosion by an upward water jet.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 143 (7): 06017007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001302.
Latifi, M., S. T. Naeeni, and A. Mahdavi. 2018. “Experimental assessment of soil effects on the leakage discharge from polyethylene pipes.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 18 (2): 539–554. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2017.134.
Leva, M. 1959. Fluidization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Majid, Z. A., R. Mohsin, Z. Yaacob, and Z. Hassan. 2010. “Failure analysis of natural gas pipes.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 17 (4): 818–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.10.016.
May, J. 1994. Pressure dependent leakage, world water and environmental engineering. Washington, DC: Water Environment Federation.
Niebuhr, D., R. Nsanzubuhoro, and J. E. van Zyl. 2020. “Field experience with pressure-based leakage characterisation of bulk water pipelines.” Urban Water J. 16 (10): 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2020.1726411.
Noack, C., and B. Ulanicki. 2008. “Modelling of soil diffusibility on leakage characteristics of buried pipes.” In Proc., 8th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symp. 2006, 1–9. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Philippe, P., and M. Badiane. 2013. “Localized fluidization in a granular medium.” J. Phys. Rev. E 87 (4): 042206. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042206.
Pike, S. M., J. E. van Zyl, and C. R. I. Clayton. 2018. “Scouring damage to buried pipes caused by leakage jets: Experimental study.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 9 (4): 4018020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000328.
Thornton, J., and A. Lambert. 2005. “Progress in practical prediction of pressure: Leakage, pressure: Burst frequency and pressure: Consumption relationships.” In Proc., IWA Special Conf., 12–14. London: International Water Association.
van Zyl, J. E., M. O. A. Alsaydalani, C. R. I. Clayton, T. Bird, and A. Dennis. 2013. “Soil fluidisation outside leaks in water distribution pipes—Preliminary observations.” In Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, 546–555. London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
van Zyl, J. E., and A. M. Cassa. 2014. “Modeling elastically deforming leaks in water distribution pipes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 140 (2): 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000813.
van Zyl, J. E., and C. R. I. Clayton. 2007. “The effect of pressure on leakage in water distribution systems.” In Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management. London: Institution of Civil Engineers.
Walski, T., W. Bezts, E. T. Posluszny, M. Weir, and B. E. Whitman. 2006. “Modeling leakage reduction through pressure control.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 98 (4): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2006.tb07642.x.
Zoueshtiagh, F., and A. Merlen. 2007. “Effect of a vertically flowing water jet underneath a granular bed.” J. Phys. Rev. E 75 (5): 056313. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.056313.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13 • Issue 4 • November 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 12, 2021
Accepted: Apr 22, 2022
Published online: Jul 12, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 12, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Milad Latifi, Rezvan Parvaneh, Seyed Taghi (Omid) Naeeni, Investigating the influence of surrounding soil properties on leakage discharge from cracks in polyethylene pipes, Engineering Failure Analysis, 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106676, 141, (106676), (2022).