Assessment of Axial Pullout Force for Buried Medium-Density Polyethylene Pipelines
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12, Issue 2
Abstract
The maximum axial force on a pipeline subjected to axial ground movement is commonly calculated using a design equation developed without proper consideration of soil-pipe interaction. The authors’ recent work revealed that soil-pipe interaction significantly contributes to the axial pullout load, particularly for flexible pipes. In this study, a three-dimensional finite element (FE) analysis is used to explore the pullout mechanism of a buried medium density polyethylene (MDPE) pipe to develop a rational method of calculating the pullout forces for the pipe. The FE model is developed through validation with experimental data available in the literature for MDPE pipes. The study reveals that axial elongation and diameter reduction occur during axial pullout of the MDPE pipe. The normal stress on the pipe surface from the ground is affected by the axial elongation and the diameter reduction, which also depends on the relative stiffness of the pipe to the surrounding soil and the shear strength parameters of the soil. A simplified method to calculate the normal force for MDPE pipe under various ground conditions is developed using FE analysis for rationally assessing the ground resistance to the pipeline.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. These include Abaqus input files and Excel data files.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the in-kind and/or financial support for this research provided by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada through its Collaborative Research and Development Grants, InnovateNL of Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, FortisBC Energy Inc and WSP Inc.
References
ALA (American Lifeline Alliance). 2001. “Guideline for the design of buried steel pipe.” Accessed February 14, 2019. https://www.americanlifelinesalliance.com/Products_new3.htm.
Anderson, C. 2004. “Soil–pipeline interaction of polyethylene natural gas pipelines in sand.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
ASCE. 1984. “Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems.” In Committee on gas and liquid fuel lifelines. New York: ASCE.
Bilgin, Ö., and H. E. Stewart. 2009. “Design guidelines for polyethylene pipe interface shear resistance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (6): 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000030.
Bolton, M. D. 1986. “The strength and dilatancy of sands.” Géotechnique 36 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.1.65.
Brachman, R. W. I. 1999. “Structural performance of leachete collection pipes.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Western Ontario.
CEPA (Canadian Energy Pipelines Association). 2017. 2017 performance data. Calgary, AB, Canada: CEPA.
Daiyan, N., S. Kenny, R. Phillips, and R. Popescu. 2011. “Investigating pipeline–soil interaction under axial–lateral relative movements in sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (11): 1683–1695. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-061.
Dassault Systems. 2014. ABAQUS/CAE user’s guide. Providence, RI: Dassault Systems.
Dhar, A. S., and I. D. Moore. 2001. “Liner buckling in profiled polyethylene pipes.” Geosynth. Int. 8 (4): 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.8.0197.
Guo, P. J., and D. F. E. Stolle. 2005. “Lateral pipe–soil interaction in sand with reference to scale effect.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (3): 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(338).
Hardin, B. O., and W. L. Black. 1966. “Sand stiffness under various triaxial stresses.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 92 (2): 27–42.
Hoeg, K. 1968. “Stress against underground cylinder.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 94 (4): 833–858.
Janbu, N. 1963. “Soil compressibility as determined by oedometer and triaxial tests.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., European Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (ECSMFE), 19–25. Essen, Germany: German Society for Earthworks and Foundations.
Konder, R. B. 1963. “Hyperbolic stress–strain response: Cohesive soils.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div 89 (SM1): 115–143.
Meidani, M., M. A. Meguid, and L. E. Chouinard. 2017. “Evaluation of soil–pipe interaction under relative axial ground movement.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 8 (4): 04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000269.
Meidani, M., M. A. Meguid, and L. E. Chouinard. 2018. “A finite-discrete element approach for modelling polyethylene pipes subjected to axial ground movement.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 14 (7): 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1483812.
Moore, I. D. 2012. “Buried pipes and culvert.” Chap. 18 in Geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering handbook, edited by R. K. Rowe. New York: Springer.
Muntakim, A. H., and A. S. Dhar. 2017. “Pipeline behaviour subjected to large ground movement.” In Proc., GeoOttawa 2017, the 70th Canadian Geotechnical Conf. Vancouver, Canada: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Muntakim, A. H., and A. S. Dhar. 2018. “Investigating axial pullout behavior of buried polyethylene pipelines.” Newsl. Int. Assoc. Comput. Methods Adv. Geomech. 23: 10–21.
Paulin, M. J., R. Phillips, J. I. Clark, A. Trigg, and I. Konuk. 1998. “A full-scale investigation into pipeline-soil interaction.” In Proc. Int. Pipeline Conf., 779–788. New York: ASME.
Sheil, B. B., C. M. Martin, B. W. Byrne, M. Plant, M. Plant, K. Williams, and D. Coyne. 2018. “Full-scale laboratory testing of a buried pipeline in sand subjected to cyclic axial displacement.” Géotechnique 68 (8): 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.275.
Webb, M. 2015. “Development of constrained soil modulus values for buried pipe design.” In Proc., ASCE Pipelines 2015 Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479360.155.
Weerasekara, L. 2007. “Response of buried natural gas pipelines subjected to ground movement (T).” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Univ. of British Columbia.
Weerasekara, L., and D. Wijewickreme. 2008. “Mobilization of soil loads on buried, polyethylene natural gas pipelines subject to relative axial displacements.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (9): 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-043.
Wijewickreme, D., H. Karimian, and D. Honegger. 2009. “Response of buried steel pipelines subjected to relative axial soil movement.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (7): 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-019.
Yimsiri, S., K. Soga, K. Yoshizaki, G. R. Dasari, and T. D. O’Rourke. 2004. “Lateral and upward soil-pipeline interactions in sand for deep embedment conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(830).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12 • Issue 2 • May 2021
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 5, 2020
Accepted: Sep 29, 2020
Published online: Dec 26, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 26, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.