Technical Notes
Oct 13, 2020

Novel Approach for Dynamic Safety Analysis of Natural Gas Leakage in Utility Tunnel

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper proposes a systemic framework for dynamic safety risk analysis for natural gas pipeline leakage in a utility tunnel, which merges the bow-tie model (BT), Bayesian network (BN), and fuzzy set theory (FST) combined with monitoring data. Firstly, the hazard factors that cause natural gas leakage in a utility tunnel are identified to establish a BT model for simulating the causal relationship under specific accident scenes. Subsequently, the BT model is mapped to the BN model via a logic relationship for probabilistic reasoning, in which the prior probability of basic event is obtained through multiexpert scoring and FST. Then, the critical events can be obtained by using sensitivity analysis. Finally, combined with the monitoring data, the prior probabilities are updated to obtain the dynamic analysis result. A case study relating to safety risk analysis of overhead natural gas pipelines in a utility tunnel in the city of Liupanshui, China, is used to verify the feasibility of the approach as well as its application potential. The proposed method not only reduces the subjectivity of expert estimations, but also provides dynamic guidance for the risk analysis of utility tunnel gas pipelines.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51574201), Research and Innovation Team of Provincial Universities in Sichuan (No. 18TD0014), and Excellent Youth Foundation of Sichuan Scientific Committee (No. 2019JDJQ0037).

References

Abbasbandy, S., and T. Hajjari. 2010. “Weighted trapezoidal approximation-preserving cores of a fuzzy number.” Comput. Math. Appl. 59 (9): 3066–3077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.02.026.
Abdelgawad, M., and A. R. Fayek. 2011. “Fuzzy reliability analyzer: Quantitative assessment of risk events in the construction industry using fuzzy fault-tree analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (4): 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000285.
Alzbutas, R., T. Iešmantas, M. Povilaitis, and J. Vitkutė. 2014. “Risk and uncertainty analysis of gas pipeline failure and gas combustion consequence.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 28 (6): 1431–1446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0845-4.
Animah, I., and M. Shafiee. 2019. “Application of risk analysis in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector: An overview.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 63 (Jan): 103980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103980.
Broere, W. 2016. “Urban underground space: Solving the problems of today’s cities.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 55 (May): 245–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012.
Canto-Perello, J., and J. Curiel-Esparza. 2013. “Assessing governance issues of urban utility tunnels.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 33 (Jan): 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.08.007.
Chen, S. H. 1985. “Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17 (2): 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90050-8.
Clemen, R. T., and R. L. Winkler. 1999. “Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis.” Risk Anal. 19 (2): 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006917509560.
Duan, X., Q. Dong, and W. Ye. 2019. “Experimental study on seismic performance of prefabricated utility tunnel.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019 (Oct): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8968260.
EGIG (European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group). 2018. Gas pipeline incidents. Paris: EGIG.
Fang, W. P., J. S. Wu, Y. P. Bai, L. B. Zhang, and G. Reniers. 2019. “Quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline in an underground utility tunnel.” Process Saf. Prog. 38 (4): 1547–5913. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12051.
Fenton, N. 2012. Risk assessment and decision analysis with Bayesian networks. Abington, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Hatefi, S. M., M. E. Basiri, and J. Tamošaitienė. 2019. “An evidential model for environmental risk assessment in projects using Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence.” Sustainability 11 (22): 6329. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226329.
He, L. P., G. L. Ma, Q. J. Hu, Q. J. Cai, Y. Bai, S. Tang, and J. Tan. 2019. “A novel method for risk assessment of cable fires in utility tunnel.” Math. Prob. Eng. 2019 (Oct): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2563012.
Ishikawa, A., and A. T. Mieno. 1993. “The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 55 (3): 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-C.
Ji, T., X. Qian, M. Yuan, D. Wang, J. He, W. Xu, and Q. You. 2017. “Case study of a natural gas explosion in Beijing, China.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 49 (Sep): 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.07.013.
Jin, C. G., Y. Lin, and Z. S. Ji. 2003. “Application of event tree analysis based on fuzzy sets in risk analysis.” J. Dalian Univ. Technol. 43 (1): 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v20n01_07.
Kabir, G., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2016. “A fuzzy Bayesian belief network for safety assessment of oil and gas pipelines.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (8): 874–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1053093.
Khakzad, N., and F. Khan. 2012. “Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 104 (Aug): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003.
Khakzad, N., F. Khan, and P. Amyotte. 2013. “Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: A Bayesian approach.” Saf. Sci. 57 (Aug): 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.022.
Leu, S. S., C. M. Chang, A. Namazian, S. H. Yakhchali, V. Yousefi, G. Baryannis, S. Dani, G. Antoniou, Y. H. Huang, and T. R. Yang. 2013. “Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 54 (May): 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.019.
Li, S., X. Liu, J. Wang, G. Fang, W. Chen, and S. Deng. 2019a. “Reduced scale experimental study and CFD analysis on the resistance characteristic of utility tunnel’s ventilation system.” Energy Procedia 158 (Feb): 2756–2761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.034.
Li, S., X. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Zheng, and S. Deng. 2019b. “Experimental reduced-scale study on the resistance characteristics of the ventilation system of a utility tunnel under different pipeline layouts.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 90 (Aug): 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.04.021.
Li, W., M. He, Y. Sun, and Q. Cao. 2019c. “A novel layered fuzzy Petri nets modelling and reasoning method for process equipment failure risk assessment.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 62 (Nov): 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103953.
Li, X. H., G. M. Chen, and H. W. Zhu. 2016. “Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 103 (Sep): 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.06.006.
Liang, K., X. Hao, W. An, Y. Tang, and Y. Cong. 2019. “Study on cable fire spread and smoke temperature distribution in T-shaped utility tunnel.” Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 14 (Sep): 100433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100433.
Lin, C. T., and J. J. Wang. 1997. “Hybrid fault tree analysis using fuzzy sets.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 58 (3): 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00072-0.
Liu, H., and Y. Tsai. 2012. “A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry.” Saf. Sci. 50 (4): 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.021.
Liu, H. N., G. Q. Zhu, R. L. Pan, M. M. Yu, and Z. H. Liang. 2019. “Experimental investigation of fire temperature distribution and ceiling temperature prediction in closed utility tunnel.” Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 14 (Sep): 100433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100493.
Lu, L., W. Liang, H. Zhang, Z. Lu, and J. Shan. 2015. “A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a bow-tie model.” J. Nat. Sci. Eng. 25 (Jul): 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.04.029.
Ma, H., and J. Ma. 2018. “Comparative study on transverse seismic design method of utility tunnel.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Mechanical, Electronic and Information Technology. Shanghai, China: International Conference on Mechanical, Electronic and Information Technology.
Muniz, M. V. P., G. B. A. Lima, R. G. G. Caiado, and O. L. G. Quelhas. 2018. “Bow tie to improve risk management of natural gas pipelines.” Process Saf. Prog. 37 (2): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11901.
Neapolitan, R. E. 2009. Probabilistic methods for bioinformatics: With an introduction to Bayesian networks. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Onisawa, T. 1988. “An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error possibility.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 27 (2): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(88)90140-6.
Onisawa, T. 1990. “An application of fuzzy concepts to modelling of reliability analysis.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 37 (3): 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(90)90026-3.
Sadiq, R., and S. Tesfamariam. 2009. “Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP).” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 23 (1): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0197-z.
Shahriar, A., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2012. “Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 (3): 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.007.
Shan, X., K. Liu, and P. L. Sun. 2017. “Risk analysis on leakage failure of natural gas pipelines by fuzzy Bayesian network with a bow-tie model.” Sci. Program. 2017 (Feb): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3639524.
Sklet, S. 2006. “Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 19 (5): 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.004.
Skogdalen, J. E., and J. E. Vinnem. 2012. “Combining precursor incidents investigations and QRA in oil and gas industry.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2012 (Feb): 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.12.009.
Suresh, P. V., A. K. Babar, and V. V. Raj. 1996. “Uncertainty in fault tree analysis: A fuzzy approach.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 83 (2): 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00386-X.
Wang, C. Q., J. S. Chai, and W. W. Niu. 2013. “Research on the consequence assessment system of natural gas pipeline leakage accidents.” In Progress in environmental protection and processing of resource, 744–748. Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech.
Wang, D., X. Qian, M. Yuan, T. Ji, W. Xu, and S. Liu. 2017a. “Numerical simulation analysis of explosion process and destructive effect by gas explosion accident in buildings.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 49 (Sep): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.07.002.
Wang, P. F., G. Q. Zhu, R. L. Pan, T. W. Chu, Z. Wang, and H. N. Liu. 2019. “Effects of curved sidewall on maximum temperature and longitudinal temperature distribution induced by linear fire source in utility tunnel.” Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 17 (Feb): 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100555.
Wang, S. L., D. W. Chen, and R. Wang. 2011. “Design of vibro-replacement stone column for foundation of multipurpose utility tunnels in Dalian.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering, 2070–2074. New York: IEEE.
Wang, W. H., K. L. Shen, B. B. Wang, C. F. Dong, F. Khan, and Q. S. Wang. 2017b. “Failure probability analysis of the urban buried gas pipelines using Bayesian networks.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 111 (Oct): 678–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.040.
Xu, Q. W., and K. L. Xu. 2018. “Mine safety assessment using gray relational analysis and bow tie model.” PLoS One 13 (3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193576.
Yan, F., K. Xu, X. Yao, and Y. Li. 2016. “Fuzzy Bayesian network-bow-tie analysis of gas leakage during biomass gasification.” PLoS One 11 (7): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160045.
Yang, Y. S., F. Khan, P. Thodi, and R. Abbassi. 2017. “Corrosion induced failure analysis of subsea pipelines.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 159 (16): 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.014.
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control 8 (3): 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Zarei, E., A. Azadeh, and N. Khakzad. 2017. “Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network.” J. Hazard. Mater. 321 (Jan): 830–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074.
Zhang, L., L. Ding, X. Wu, and M. J. Skibniewski. 2017. “An improved Dempster–Shafer approach to construction safety risk perception.” Knowledge Based Syst. 132 (Sep): 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.06.014.
Zhang, L. M., M. J. Skibniewski, X. G. Wu, Y. Q. Chen, and Q. L. Deng. 2014. “A probabilistic approach for safety risk analysis in metro construction.” Saf. Sci. 63 (Mar): 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.016.
Zhou, X. H., H. T. Pan, and Y. F. Shen. 2017. China’s underground comprehensive utility tunnel project of PPP mode risk identification. Banff, AB: International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12Issue 1February 2021

History

Received: Oct 30, 2019
Accepted: Jun 8, 2020
Published online: Oct 13, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 13, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, PR China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu 610500, PR China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share